PDA

View Full Version : Now a special counsel for Comey?



jimnyc
07-28-2017, 12:49 PM
I have to wonder, 100% for sure, what all was going on behind the scenes? Hillary cheating and the MSM helping her. Various folks supposedly meeting with Russians. LACK of appropriate investigations. Unmasking.

We don't know AT ALL for sure at this point WTF went on. NO ONE can say for sure, too early. But seems as if this was an elections for the ages.

---

House Judiciary Committee Calls for Second Special Counsel on Possible Comey Misconduct

Members of the House Judiciary Committee sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions calling for a second special counsel to be appointed to address the possible misconduct of former FBI Director James Comey. The letter also asked for an investigation into other matters not covered by the scope of the current special counsel's investigation into Russia's attempts to influence last year's presidential election.

https://i.imgur.com/IdPrgk4.png

The press release from the House Judiciary Committee states:

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Judiciary Committee Republicans today sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein calling for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate unaddressed matters, some connected to the 2016 election and others, including many actions taken by Obama Administration officials like Attorney General Loretta Lynch, FBI Director James Comey, and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The letter follows yesterday’s House Judiciary Committee approval of H. Res. 446, as amended, to request documents pertaining to the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary Clinton.

In their letter, the Judiciary Committee members express concern that the directive given to Special Counsel Robert Mueller is narrow in scope and many concerns arising out of the 2016 presidential election and its aftermath are not being investigated. The members call for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate grave concerns such as former Attorney General Lynch’s directive to former FBI Director Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the investigation into former Secretary Clinton; the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions related to the Clinton email investigation, including the immunity deals given to potential co-conspirators; selected leaks of classified information that unmasked U.S. persons incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community; and the FBI’s reliance on “Fusion GPS” in its investigation of the Trump campaign, among many others issues.

Rest here - https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/07/27/breaking-house-judiciary-committee-calls-for-2nd-special-counsel-on-comey-misconduct/

Kathianne
08-03-2017, 07:44 AM
and with Lynch/Bill Clinton?

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-justice-department-blacks-talking-points-lynch-clinton-tarmac-meeting/?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=press%20release


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced that the Justice Department refuses to disclose the talking points developed by the Obama Justice Department to help it respond to press inquiries about the controversial June 27, 2016, tarmac meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

The Justice Department heavily redacted the documents under Exemption b (5), which allows agencies to withhold draft or deliberative process material. The blacked-out material centers around talking points drafted and used by Justice to respond to press inquiries about the Lynch-Clinton meeting.


The agency produced 417 pages (http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/tag/doj-lynch-clinton-meeting/) of documents in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-doj-records-relating-tarmac-meeting-attorney-general-loretta-lynch-former-president-bill-clinton-june-2016/) (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-clinton-lynch-meeting-complaint-00421/) (No. 1:17-cv-00421) seeking:


All records and/or transcripts of a meeting held between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in June 2016.
All records of communication sent to or from officials in the Office of the Attorney General regarding the meeting held between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in June 2016.
All records of communication sent to or from officials in the Office of the Deputy Attorney General regarding the meeting held between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton in June 2016.
All references to the meeting held between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton contained in day planners, calendars and schedules in the Office of the Attorney General.

One email exchange shows that Former Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik was brought in to assist with public relations issues (http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-clinton-lynch-meeting-production-2-00421-pg-9/) on June 28, 2016, the day after the tarmac meeting. (Kadzik is a longtime friend of John Podesta and a Hillary Clinton donor, who was criticized (http://freebeacon.com/politics/doj-official-involved-huma-abedin-email-probe-donated-hillary/) as being conflicted when he was assigned as the Justice Department attorney to oversee the probe of Hillary Clinton’s and her aide Huma Abedin’s emails found on Anthony Wiener’s computer.)


Director of the Justice Department Public Affairs Office Melanie Newman sent an email to Richard P. Quinn, former National Security Assistant Special Agent, and Michael P. Kortan, who is currently the assistant director for Public Affairs for the FBI, advising them she wanted to “flag a story (http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-clinton-lynch-meeting-production-2-00421-pg-99/)” about “a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” And she provides the AG’s talking points.


Lynch met privately (http://www.abc15.com/news/region-phoenix-metro/central-phoenix/loretta-lynch-bill-clinton-meet-privately-in-phoenix) with former President Bill Clinton on board a parked plane in Phoenix. The meeting occurred during the then-ongoing investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email server, and only a few days before she was interviewed by the FBI. Lynch later admitted that the meeting with Bill Clinton “cast a cloud (https://www.nytimes.com/live/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-testifies-before-congress/goodlatte-lays-into-clinton/)” over the Justice Department/FBI investigation. A week after the tarmac meeting, FBI Director James Comey called Hillary Clinton’s actions “extremely careless” but did not recommend charges and Attorney General Lynch ended the criminal investigation.


“It is jaw-dropping that the Trump administration is blacking out key information about how the Obama Justice Department tried to spin Loretta Lynch’s scandalous meeting with Bill Clinton,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “President Trump should order the full and immediate release of these materials.”

Kathianne
08-10-2017, 07:35 AM
This certainly sounds dodgy:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/attorney-for-loretta-lynch-at-justice-department-now-at-committee-investigating-lynch/article/2631026


Attorney for Loretta Lynch at Justice Department now at committee investigating Lynchby Todd Shepherd (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/author/todd-shepherd) | Aug 9, 2017, 12:26 PM (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/attorney-for-loretta-lynch-at-justice-department-now-at-committee-investigating-lynch/article/2631026#)

...

High_Plains_Drifter
08-10-2017, 08:55 AM
This certainly sounds dodgy:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/attorney-for-loretta-lynch-at-justice-department-now-at-committee-investigating-lynch/article/2631026

Absolutely... and there's no S.C. been appointed yet to investigate known Clinton, Lynch and Comey crimes. I think the DOJ, as is the FBI, is full of obama hold overs and democrats, and I'm also quite disappointed with Sessions. He could fix this if he wanted, but he's MIA.