James Comey ‘Rigged’ Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation

[jimnyc]

How the hell do you start wrapping things up and writing before you even interview the prime person involved? This just never ends with Hillary, and the help she received.

--

James Comey ‘Rigged’ Hillary Clinton FBI Investigation

President Donald Trump reacted to reports that former FBI Director James Comey already started drafting a statement clearing Hillary Clinton two months before she was interviewed by the FBI.

“Wow, looks like James Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton long before the investigation was over…and so much more,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “A rigged system!”

In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray, Republican senators revealed transcripts of an Office of Special Council interview with Comey’s Chief of Staff and other FBI officials.

“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second — that’s no way to run an investigation,” the letter from Senator Chuck Grassley and Senator Lindsey Graham read. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders also commented on the story in Thursday’s press briefing.

“If it is as accurate as they say it is, that would certainly give cause and reason that Jim Comey was not the right person to lead the FBI,” she said.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/01/donald-trump-james-comey-rigged-hillary-clinton-fbi-investigation/

[pete311]

amazing how you love unverified claims by anonymous sources when they work in your favor.

[Kathianne]

amazing how you love unverified claims by anonymous sources when they work in your favor.

Grassley is not an unnamed source, which is where the story comes from.

[jimnyc]

amazing how you love unverified claims by anonymous sources when they work in your favor.

Grassley isn't unnamed, nor are MEMO's. Glad you READ the article though, as per usual. :)

Here, buddy, I'll make it easier, since I know for a FACT you didn't read the linked to PDF doc...

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-08-30%20CEG%20+%20LG%20to%20FBI%20(Comey%20Statement) .pdf

[pete311]

Grassley isn't unnamed, nor are MEMO's. Glad you READ the article though, as per usual. :)

Here, buddy, I'll make it easier, since I know for a FACT you didn't read the linked to PDF doc...

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-08-30%20CEG%20+%20LG%20to%20FBI%20(Comey%20Statement) .pdf

Jim respectfully fuck off ;). Not who made the report. I'm not that much of a dolt. Who revealed the information? It says "OSC attorneys questioned two witnesses, presumably Mr. Rybicki and Ms. Anderson". So, we don't know which or even if the information came from those two.

[jimnyc]

Jim respectfully fuck off ;). Not who made the report. I'm not that much of a dolt. Who revealed the information? It says "OSC attorneys questioned two witnesses, presumably Mr. Rybicki and Ms. Anderson". So, we don't know which or even if the information came from those two.

Yeah, just unknown folks from Breitbart news sneaking into the mix and confusing congress and Comey, and magically having him starting to close his case prematurely.

But I see as things are pointed out, and liberals have a lack of facts to back up their odd stances of standing along side such things, their arguments start to lean towards "fuck off" and such.

It's all lies, Pete, don't believe the hype!

[pete311]

Yeah, just unknown folks from Breitbart news sneaking into the mix and confusing congress and Comey, and magically having him starting to close his case prematurely.

But I see as things are pointed out, and liberals have a lack of facts to back up their odd stances of standing along side such things, their arguments start to lean towards "fuck off" and such.

It's all lies, Pete, don't believe the hype!

The double standard holds. Mueller must be getting close.

[jimnyc]

The double standard holds. Mueller must be getting close.

Getting close with what, Pete? Russia? :lol: Even Feinstein and other top Dems will tell you there's nothing there. Again, maybe Manafort? Not sure. But I wouldn't get your little heart set on Trump. Then again, yeah, go ahead and post for us how guilty you think he is - and all the supporting proof. :coffee:

As for Hillary - Um yeah. As if there would be no reason to believe that Lynch may have helped her, or Comey, or Brazile, or CNN or others that helped her cheat during the primaries. And then we're truly insane nutters, to see that, and all the proof we've already seen with her emails and server - to think maybe she had more help in exonerating her. The thought!! Never!! :laugh:

[Kathianne]

Getting close with what, Pete? Russia? :lol: Even Feinstein and other top Dems will tell you there's nothing there. Again, maybe Manafort? Not sure. But I wouldn't get your little heart set on Trump. Then again, yeah, go ahead and post for us how guilty you think he is - and all the supporting proof. :coffee:

As for Hillary - Um yeah. As if there would be no reason to believe that Lynch may have helped her, or Comey, or Brazile, or CNN or others that helped her cheat during the primaries. And then we're truly insane nutters, to see that, and all the proof we've already seen with her emails and server - to think maybe she had more help in exonerating her. The thought!! Never!! :laugh:

My personal dislike of Trump being beside the point, I agree with you Jim. I don't think Trump is necessarily 'clean' but not necessarily guilty of what Pete and others hope.

[jimnyc]

More of the same...

--

Comey Began Drafting EmailGate 'Exoneration Statement' Before Interviewing 17 Key Witnesses, Including Clinton

Former FBI Director James Comey began drafting a statement announcing his decision not to refer then Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for prosecution in the investigation into her private email use long before interviewing key witnesses, including Clinton herself, according to new transcripts released by the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday afternoon. His mind was made up months before the FBI's "immunity agreements" with top Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, as well.

Via Fox News:


“Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation,” Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham wrote in a letter this week to the FBI. “The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”
Grassley and Graham said they learned about Comey’s draft "exoneration statement" after reviewing transcripts of interviews with top Comey aides.

“According to the unredacted portions of the transcripts, it appears that in April or early May of 2016, Mr. Comey had already decided he would issue a statement exonerating Secretary Clinton,” the senators said.

They added, “That was long before FBI agents finished their work. Mr. Comey even circulated an early draft statement to select members of senior FBI leadership. The outcome of an investigation should not be prejudged while FBI agents are still hard at work trying to gather the facts.”

Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2016, was investigated by the FBI for using a private email address and server to handle classified information while serving as secretary of state.

The letter continues: "It is unclear whether the FBI agents actually investigating the case were aware that Mr. Comey had already decided on the investigation’s outcome while their work was ongoing. However, it appears that the answer to that question may be underneath some of the extensive redactions that the Department made to the transcripts."

In his now-famous press conference on July 5, 2016, Comey laid out all of Clinton’s email infractions, calling her “extremely careless” but stopping short of recommending criminal charges -- citing a lack of intent on her part.

The language Comey used at the time to exonerate Clinton was stunningly similar to then-president Obama's phrasing on Fox News a few months before. "Hillary Clinton was an outstanding secretary of state. She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy," Obama told Fox News anchor Chris Wallace on April 10, 2016.

Rest here - https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/08/31/comey-began-drafting-emailgate-exoneration-statement-interviewing-17-key-witnesses-including-clinton/

[pete311]

My personal dislike of Trump being beside the point, I agree with you Jim. I don't think Trump is necessarily 'clean' but not necessarily guilty of what Pete and others hope.

The nice thing about all this is that none of our opinions matter because we know jack squat what Mueller and his team know or are doing. That more or less applies to even the senate intel committees who don't have near the resources are mueller.

[pete311]

Friend of Comey just tweeted this

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10827&stc=1

[Black Diamond]

Friend of Comey just tweeted this

http://www.debatepolicy.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=10827&stc=1
Go figure. I thought a friend of comeys would say what a lying fuckstick Comey is. Thanks for this interesting tidbit.

[jimnyc]

Friend of Comey just tweeted this

That makes little sense. If only made up by anonymous sources and may not have been true, anyway. :)

[Black Diamond]

That makes little sense. If only made up by anonymous sources and may not have been true, anyway. :)
I think Bush tweeted it.

[Black Diamond]

The double standard holds. Mueller must be getting close.
To finding Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.

[aboutime]

So tell us petey. When was the last time you talked with Muller, or Comey to verify what you are insisting by putting that TWEET up for us to read?

Even I can post an image that was created by someone else.



<img src="http://icansayit.com/attachment.jpg">