PDA

View Full Version : ‘Throw All That Crap Out’: John Bolton To Declare War On White House Leakers



jimnyc
03-27-2018, 03:24 PM
I believe I've heard this claim about getting to the leakers before, but at least this one has more experience. IMO, the problem is still former employees all over the place, and I still don't trust our intel agencies in the slightest bit. I sure hope this purge starts quickly, and is a large number.

--

‘Throw All That Crap Out’: John Bolton To Declare War On White House Leakers Amid Talk Of Obama Holdover Bloodbath

Attention leakers and Obama holdovers (or both!) currently working to undermine President Trump’s foreign policy: your days in the White House are reportedly numbered.

Daily Caller reports:

Sources told Foreign Policy that Bolton’s planned purge will start with Obama administration holdovers and eventually broaden to include leakers and those disloyal to the president. […]

Another official issued a warning to former Obama officials — “Everyone who was there during Obama years should start packing their shit.”

But the purge reportedly won’t stop with former Obama appointees. A source told Foreign Policy that Bolton intends to “remove almost all the political [appointees] McMaster brought in.”

Another Daily Caller report adds:

These officials tell TheDC Bolton has been charged by President Donald Trump to stop national security leaks from inside the administration and to change the current relationship between the NSC and the president. […]

“Bolton understands that the NSC’s job is to implement the president’s policy, not to influence policy,” a former Trump NSC official told TheDC.

The official added that outgoing NSA H.R. McMaster would tell staffers before any decision was formulated that “our solutions would start with our values,” but added that “Bolton will throw all that crap out” by focusing on a threat and all available solutions.

Rest - http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/throw-all-that-crap-out-john-bolton-to-declare-war-on-white-house-leakers-amid-talk-of-obama-holdover-purge/

LongTermGuy
03-27-2018, 09:07 PM
Oh...ya...Perfect!:salute:



http://financialconsultant.blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/trump-security-pick-john-bolton-likely-to-turn-up-heat-on-iran-and-drive-up-oil-prices-1050x600.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=10&v=F-nuV36fvgQ

gabosaurus
03-27-2018, 11:13 PM
I wonder if Trump really wants to know where all the leaks are coming from. He might not like the results.
Trump is known to make indiscriminate phone calls to people late at night and early in the morning. Some of the recipients are known to have leaked this information. Rogers Ailes is one of those.
Kellyanne Conway is a suspected leaker. So was Hope Hicks.
Then there is Jared Kushner. A known liberal, Kusher has never been a fan of Trump. Eric Trump is also a suspect.
And then there is Melania. A lot of very personal information has been leaked about The Donald. I have to wonder if she has ulterior motives for remaining silent through all the turmoil. :cool:

LongTermGuy
03-28-2018, 01:12 AM
I wonder if Trump really wants to know where all the leaks are coming from. He might not like the results.
Trump is known to make indiscriminate phone calls to people late at night and early in the morning. Some of the recipients are known to have leaked this information. Rogers Ailes is one of those.
Kellyanne Conway is a suspected leaker. So was Hope Hicks.
Then there is Jared Kushner. A known liberal, Kusher has never been a fan of Trump. Eric Trump is also a suspect.
And then there is Melania. A lot of very personal information has been leaked about The Donald. I have to wonder if she has ulterior motives for remaining silent through all the turmoil. :cool:


https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AngelicPersonalCleanerwrasse-size_restricted.gif

Gunny
03-28-2018, 05:58 AM
I wonder if Trump really wants to know where all the leaks are coming from. He might not like the results.
Trump is known to make indiscriminate phone calls to people late at night and early in the morning. Some of the recipients are known to have leaked this information. Rogers Ailes is one of those.
Kellyanne Conway is a suspected leaker. So was Hope Hicks.
Then there is Jared Kushner. A known liberal, Kusher has never been a fan of Trump. Eric Trump is also a suspect.
And then there is Melania. A lot of very personal information has been leaked about The Donald. I have to wonder if she has ulterior motives for remaining silent through all the turmoil. :cool:Thanks for the "Dear Gabby" gossip report. :rolleyes:

High_Plains_Drifter
03-28-2018, 08:10 AM
Bolton has always reminded me of the old Disney character that made Pinocchio.

Kathianne
03-28-2018, 08:11 AM
Bolton has always reminded me of the old Disney character that made Pinocchio.

Geppetto.

jimnyc
03-28-2018, 08:25 AM
Why I continually waste my time, I don't know, but I'll humor this as I enjoy my coffee this morn.


I wonder if Trump really wants to know where all the leaks are coming from. He might not like the results.

I'm sure he wants to know, and I'm VERY sure that it's leftist nutters and the deep state folks that can't get their agendas completed.


Trump is known to make indiscriminate phone calls to people late at night and early in the morning. Some of the recipients are known to have leaked this information. Rogers Ailes is one of those.

Care to show proof of these indiscriminate calls? What, you read an article on a lefty site and now it's gospel. Proof would be nice, you know, a link, those things you rarely supply. And I'm sure you knew this already, but he's not calling Ailes, not since at least early last year. :rolleyes:


Kellyanne Conway is a suspected leaker. So was Hope Hicks.

Suspected by whom? Lefties that don't care for them? WHO else is suspecting them? Trump? Others in the administration? Mueller?


Then there is Jared Kushner. A known liberal, Kusher has never been a fan of Trump. Eric Trump is also a suspect.

Again, WHO suspects them? WHO are you claiming that somehow claims that his son in law, and son, are the source of damaging leaks? This is gossip crap, which you instantly believe because it would be negative on this administration, and even personally. But you offer NOTHING in the lines of proof, absolutely nothing. No links, no story from memory, just nothing.


And then there is Melania. A lot of very personal information has been leaked about The Donald. I have to wonder if she has ulterior motives for remaining silent through all the turmoil. :cool:

Melania knows the gig and obviously doesn't fall for the MSM and democrat lowlife tricks and agendas. It's simply not working, and your claim or thoughts of ulterior motives, well again come with nothing more than your liberal thoughts and zero for proof.

Well, Mrs. Gossip, please return and try again when you have proof or something substantial to add or debate/discuss. Your post is filled with little schoolgirl giggly invented crap.

gabosaurus
03-28-2018, 10:29 AM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.

High_Plains_Drifter
03-28-2018, 10:40 AM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.
I'm going to start calling you Baghdad Gab.

Black Diamond
03-28-2018, 10:42 AM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.
Serious shit like whether trump fucked a porn star.

jimnyc
03-28-2018, 10:57 AM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.

And yet, even when offered to specifically point out which facts are wrong, and even offered $$ based on posts from Breitbart I have posted - you always disappear.

A news agency or website can surely be one sided and lean heavily in that direction - and yet still post articles that contain the truth and facts. That's why you hate them, and then disappear. As you read their stuff and don't like it, but know you can't dispute the facts, you so go and kick the neighbors dog and come back a month later.

Once again, wrong. I mean, without posting links, and nothing but emotional biased opinions, you'll simply never be right. You whine and moan, but completely ignore facts, even when tested. You don't even stand behind your own words.

Gunny
03-28-2018, 12:11 PM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.Yeah. You mean like Russian collusion? There's a conspiracy theory Republicans are -- oh wait --- :slap:

Leftwingnuts LOVE gossip. You'd much rather make up some crap than tell the truth. Reminds me of when my granddaughter was 4 :rolleyes:

Elessar
03-28-2018, 12:49 PM
Republicans are enamored with gossip and conspiracy theories. That is what sites like breitbart and pjmedia are based on -- gossip, hearsay and conspiracy theories. If you dig on the other side of the fence, you see where all the serious shit is going down. If you stay behind the wall, you see and hear nothing.

Oh really? All Republicans? Like you lumping them all together, a blanket statement without any basis in fact?
How childish! That is like saying ALL Democrats are Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, or Tranny. Bet you would like to
wear that tag, wouldn't you?

It is pretty well known the the largest amount of conspiracy theory publishers are liberal...that is part of their daily
bread and butter. What was once written? "A liberal cannot let a good conspiracy theory go to waste." 9/11 cospiracy
theorists certainly were not conservative - collectively - as were liberals. That is just one glaring example.

Gossip? All Republicans? Again a collective blanket statement. I've seen more rumor and ill-directed gossip come from liberal sources
than from conservative. Gossip is the jelly for the bread and butter of conspiracy that liberals love so much.

gabosaurus
03-28-2018, 07:35 PM
And yet, even when offered to specifically point out which facts are wrong, and even offered $$ based on posts from Breitbart I have posted - you always disappear.

A news agency or website can surely be one sided and lean heavily in that direction - and yet still post articles that contain the truth and facts. That's why you hate them, and then disappear. As you read their stuff and don't like it, but know you can't dispute the facts, you so go and kick the neighbors dog and come back a month later.

Once again, wrong. I mean, without posting links, and nothing but emotional biased opinions, you'll simply never be right. You whine and moan, but completely ignore facts, even when tested. You don't even stand behind your own words.

A -- DP thrives on emotionally biased opinion. Like "I've seen more rumor and ill-directed gossip come from liberal sources
than from conservative. Gossip is the jelly for the bread and butter of conspiracy that liberals love so much." Both statements being completely wrong.

B -- I can post links by the dozens and you will find a reason not to accept any of them. Because any site that doesn't unequivocally endorse the Trump or conservative line is considered the "biased liberal media," which is never trusted.

C -- I "disappear and come back later" because I have other things to do. I am not retired like so many folks here. I don't have the luxury of sitting at home surfing the net all day.

D -- You also whine and moan, but completely ignore facts, even when tested. Because the guys on DP are never wrong. Even when they are wrong, they aren't wrong. Because no one can ever prove it to their satisfaction.

E -- Look at the threads or replies that I have posted that run contrary to the prevailing DP opinion. I rarely get a straight response. /the usual recourse is:
**Avoid the topic or change the subject.
**Point out that Obama or Clinton has done something much worse
**Attack liberals for being stupid, even if it has nothing to do with the subject
**Accuse me of trolling. Because any disagreement has to be trolling.

aboutime
03-28-2018, 07:46 PM
A -- DP thrives on emotionally biased opinion. Like "I've seen more rumor and ill-directed gossip come from liberal sources
than from conservative. Gossip is the jelly for the bread and butter of conspiracy that liberals love so much." Both statements being completely wrong.

B -- I can post links by the dozens and you will find a reason not to accept any of them. Because any site that doesn't unequivocally endorse the Trump or conservative line is considered the "biased liberal media," which is never trusted.

C -- I "disappear and come back later" because I have other things to do. I am not retired like so many folks here. I don't have the luxury of sitting at home surfing the net all day.

D -- You also whine and moan, but completely ignore facts, even when tested. Because the guys on DP are never wrong. Even when they are wrong, they aren't wrong. Because no one can ever prove it to their satisfaction.

E -- Look at the threads or replies that I have posted that run contrary to the prevailing DP opinion. I rarely get a straight response. /the usual recourse is:
**Avoid the topic or change the subject.
**Point out that Obama or Clinton has done something much worse
**Attack liberals for being stupid, even if it has nothing to do with the subject
**Accuse me of trolling. Because any disagreement has to be trolling.



Whining as you did above only proves how the rest of us are completely Right about you.
You can make points labeled with letters all day long, but that cannot change how wrong you are in nearly everything you post. It's not because you are a DIE-HARD liberal, but rather, because you have been so diluted with liberal lies...you have no concept of ACTUAL, HONEST TRUTH.

By the way. You really ARE a Troll.

LongTermGuy
03-28-2018, 07:57 PM
Whining as you did above only proves how the rest of us are completely Right about you.
You can make points labeled with letters all day long, but that cannot change how wrong you are in nearly everything you post. It's not because you are a DIE-HARD liberal, but rather, because you have been so diluted with liberal lies...you have no concept of ACTUAL, HONEST TRUTH.

By the way. You really ARE a Troll.


"Good post....you have more energy than I do in answering the young...indoctrinated Liberals naiveness..The liberal female life form logic is seriously Flawed "

http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/51/63/1542754416-SpockFascinating.jpg

Gunny
03-28-2018, 09:15 PM
A -- DP thrives on emotionally biased opinion. Like "I've seen more rumor and ill-directed gossip come from liberal sources
than from conservative. Gossip is the jelly for the bread and butter of conspiracy that liberals love so much." Both statements being completely wrong.

B -- I can post links by the dozens and you will find a reason not to accept any of them. Because any site that doesn't unequivocally endorse the Trump or conservative line is considered the "biased liberal media," which is never trusted.

C -- I "disappear and come back later" because I have other things to do. I am not retired like so many folks here. I don't have the luxury of sitting at home surfing the net all day.

D -- You also whine and moan, but completely ignore facts, even when tested. Because the guys on DP are never wrong. Even when they are wrong, they aren't wrong. Because no one can ever prove it to their satisfaction.

E -- Look at the threads or replies that I have posted that run contrary to the prevailing DP opinion. I rarely get a straight response. /the usual recourse is:
**Avoid the topic or change the subject.
**Point out that Obama or Clinton has done something much worse
**Attack liberals for being stupid, even if it has nothing to do with the subject
**Accuse me of trolling. Because any disagreement has to be trolling.Righteous indignation doesn't suit you. Nor does it apply. How many times have I given you a straight-up, non-partisan response to get NOTHING in return? More than I can remember.

But bitching about being called a troll when I've watched you year after year after year PURPOSEFULLY pick the people you know are going to yell and throw what you KNOW is bullshit at them just to get them to do it. That's pretty-much trolling and you know I'm right.

Where's that fiddle player emo thingy .... :boohoo:

Feel better? ;)

aboutime
03-28-2018, 09:20 PM
"Good post....you have more energy than I do in answering the young...indoctrinated Liberals naiveness..The liberal female life form logic is seriously Flawed "

http://cdn.quotesgram.com/small/51/63/1542754416-SpockFascinating.jpg


I can't consider gabby as being a genuine female since I respect REAL WOMEN who actually have the ability to see through Lies, Fabrications, and Hypocrisy as humans who are capable of THINKING for themselves. I was brought up to respect WOMEN, LADIES. GIRLS, but I draw the line on phony, wannabe Liberally trained, mindless TROLLS who pretend to be honest, and accept only THEIR version of Truth.