PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Slaps Sanctions On Putin Cronies For Russia’s ‘Malign Activity’



Gunny
04-06-2018, 05:33 PM
April 6, 2018
By Lesley Wroughton and Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The United States imposed major sanctions on Friday against 24 Russians, striking at allies of President Vladimir Putin in one of Washington’s most aggressive moves to punish Moscow for its alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election and other “malign activity.”
The action, taken under pressure from the U.S. Congress, freezes the U.S. assets of oligarchs such as aluminum tycoon Oleg Deripaska, a close associate of Putin, and lawmaker Suleiman Kerimov, whose family controls Russia’s largest gold producer, Polyus.
The sanctions largely respond to what U.S. intelligence agencies have said was Russian interference in the presidential election, although the Treasury Department painted them as a response to a series of adversarial actions by Moscow.
U.S. President Donald Trump has been under fire for not taking strong action against Russia after a series of diplomatic disputes reminiscent of the Cold War era. The sanctions could complicate his hopes for good relations with Putin.
Relations already had worsened recently as the United States expelled Russian diplomats over a poisoning case in Britain and imposed sanctions on Russians for alleged links to cyber attacks (http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/#).
The latest move is aimed at seven Russian oligarchs and 12 companies they own or control, plus 17 senior Russian government officials. They freeze the U.S. assets of the people and companies named and forbid Americans in general from doing business with them.
Trump has faced criticism – including from fellow Republicans – for doing too little to punish Russia for the election meddling. The U.S. Treasury Department said the sanctions were in response to Russia’s “malign activity,” including its actions in Ukraine, its support of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria’s civil war and subverting Western democracies.
U.S. intelligence agencies last year accused Russia of using hacking, false information and propaganda to disrupt the 2016 elections and try to ensure Trump defeated Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. Russia denies interfering in the election.
Preparations for a meeting between Trump and Putin will not be affected by the sanctions, the White House said.
“As the president has said, he wants to have a good relationship with Russia but that’s going to depend on some of the actions by the Russians,” White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters.
Russia said it would respond firmly to the sanctions.
“Of course we will not leave this current and any new anti-Russian attack without a harsh answer,” Russia’s foreign ministry said in a statement. “But first of all we would like to recommend that Washington discard illusions that we can be spoken to in the language of sanctions.”
OLIGARCHS AND ELITES
The sanctions could hurt the Russian economy, especially the aluminum, financial and energy sectors, and are a clear message to Putin and his inner circle of U.S. displeasure.
Others on the sanctions list include Viktor Vekselberg, key owner of Renova holding group who Forbes magazine ranks as Russia’s 9th richest businessman. He is famous for bringing back a collection of Faberge eggs to Russia.
Also targeted is Kirill Shamalov, a minority shareholder with petrochemical company Sibur. Shamalov married Putin’s youngest daughter Katerina in 2013 but unconfirmed media reports say they have since split.
The CEO of Russia’s gas (http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/#) exporter Gazprom, Alexei Miller, said he was proud to be targeted by sanctions.
“Not being included in the first list I even had some doubts – maybe something is wrong (with me)? But I am finally included. This means that we are doing everything right,” Miller said through his spokesman, referring to an earlier U.S. list of Russian oligarchs.
Gazprom has relationships with major foreign companies, especially in Europe. Gazprom itself is not under sanctions, but the inclusion of Miller on the blacklist could create complicated legal dilemmas for partner companies. Although they are under European Union jurisdiction, they will not want to fall foul of any U.S. legislation
Deripaska’s blacklisting will also reverberate around the world because his empire has a global footprint and counts major multinationals as partners, including German automaker Volkswagen <VOWG_p.DE>.
Deripaska called the decision to target him “very unfortunate but not unexpected.”
“Certainly the grounds for putting my name on the list of SDNs as provided by U.S. officials are groundless, ridiculous and absurd,” he said, in a statement sent to Reuters by a spokesperson for his industrial group Basic Element. SDN stands for “Specially Designated National.”
A Cyprus-based company tied to Deripaska sued Paul Manafort and Rick Gates, two former aides to Trump’s presidential campaign, in a New York state court in January, accusing them of misappropriating more than $18.9 million earmarked for deals (http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/#) in Ukraine in 2008.
Shares in some Russian companies targeted by the sanctions plummeted. EN+ Group, which manages Deripaska’s aluminum and hydropower assets, ended down 20.9 percent on the London stock exchange (http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/#).
Rusal, a Russian aluminum giant fell 10 percent on the Moscow Exchange.
Douglas Jacobson, an attorney with Jacobson Burton Kelley firm in Washington, said most international Western banks would shy away from helping the companies targeted on Friday to raise capital. “These companies now are radioactive,” he said.
The Treasury Department has told investors they have until May 7 to divest any stocks (http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/#), bonds or other holdings of the Russian companies En+, GAZ,and Rusal. For the 12 companies named on Friday, Treasury said any contracts and activities must be terminated in 60 days.
RUSSIA AND TRUMP
Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, urged Trump to set out a clear strategy.
“Nearly 15 months into this administration, the American people and our allies are still questioning whether the president is willing to fully defend our democracy and our national security,” said Menendez, co-author of the law under which Friday’s sanctions were imposed.
U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller is investigating whether Trump’s election campaign colluded with Russia, something that Trump denies.
Trump angered many members of Congress by failing for months to implement sanctions on Russia that lawmakers passed nearly unanimously last year. But Daniel Fried, the U.S. government’s former coordinator of sanctions policy under President Barack Obama, said the sanctions list “is a solid piece of work.”
Putin’s government has been blamed for the poisoning of a former Russian double agent living in Britain last month and the United States and several European states announced plans to expel more than 100 Russian diplomats in response.
(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton and Patricia Zengerle; Additional reporting by Doina Chiacu, Tim Ahmann and Susan Heavey in Washington, Nathan Lane, Michael Erman and Karen Freifeld in New York and Andrew Osborn, Katya Golubkova, Gleb Stolyarov and Oksana Kobzeva, Denis Pinchuk, Christian Lowe and Gabrielle Tetrault-Farber in Moscow; Writing by Alistair Bell and Mary Milliken; Editing by Yara Bayoumy, Bill Trott and Tom Brown)
http://www.oann.com/u-s-issues-fresh-russian-sanctions-treasury-department/

Gunny
04-06-2018, 05:36 PM
April 6, 2018
MOSCOW (Reuters) – Moscow said on Friday it would respond firmly to new U.S. sanctions imposed against Russian businessmen, companies and government officials for what Washington called “malign activity” including alleged meddling in the 2016 U.S. election.
The sanctions freeze the U.S. assets of “oligarchs” such as aluminum tycoon Oleg Deripaska, a close associate of President Vladimir Putin, and lawmaker Suleiman Kerimov, whose family controls Russia’s largest gold producer, Polyus.
“Of course we will not leave this current and any new anti-Russian attack without a harsh answer,” Russia’s foreign ministry said in a statement. “But first of all we would like to recommend that Washington discard illusions that we can be spoken (http://www.oann.com/russia-says-it-will-respond-firmly-to-new-u-s-sanctions/#) to in the language of sanctions.”
The ministry said no pressure could make Russia change course and that the sanctions would only unite Russian society.
“Having not waited for the desired effect of previous sanctions, Washington politicians have reached such absurdity that they are trying to hit our companies that have long maintained business ties with the United States, on which thousands of jobs (http://www.oann.com/russia-says-it-will-respond-firmly-to-new-u-s-sanctions/#) depend there,” the statement said.
Russia’s relations with the United States have further soured recently as Washington expelled Russian diplomats over the poisoning of former Russian double agent Sergei Skripal in Britain and imposed sanctions on Russians for alleged links to cyber attacks (http://www.oann.com/russia-says-it-will-respond-firmly-to-new-u-s-sanctions/#).
(Reporting by Gabrielle Tétrault-Farber; Editing by Catherine Evans)
http://www.oann.com/russia-says-it-will-respond-firmly-to-new-u-s-sanctions/

Russia's response :rolleyes:. They will respond "firmly". By doing WHAT? Poison Hillary Clinton? We'll feel bad :laugh:

Gunny
04-06-2018, 05:47 PM
If Trump does meet with Putin he better not accept any "gifts".:halo9:

mundame
04-07-2018, 08:12 AM
I'm so impressed with the strong action led by Britain (I assume) to throw out so MANY Russkie diplomats and spies all over the world, especially Europe. I didn't think they'd manage a strong reply to Russia's really dangerous and illegal and hostile biological weapon use in Western capitals. Well, London, anyway. But they did, and my opinion of Prime Minister May has gone up.

These latest sanctions are sort of an afterthought --- I'm reading that there really isn't anything else the West can do short of war to reply to these aggressions.

This is probably just a failure of imagination, however.

I think we need to rearm and get the military in gear, soonest. North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan --- if war isn't coming, I've wasted a lot of time reading history.

Probably from a direction that isn't any of these. Assassination of a prominent politician started both WWI and the Spanish Civil War. Sinking ships is good for starting wars --- the Spanish-American war and Vietnam, Tonkin Gulf, both worked. Not foolproof, though: North Korea sunk a SK ship, didn't work; and the Lusitania sunk by a German sub didn't work (the Lusitania was English, but Winston Churchill hoped the 125 drowned Americans would bring us into the war, but it didn't); and of course bin Laden hit the USS Cole after blowing up two of our embassies, but nobody cared. The big secret about America is that we don't care about anything that happens outside our borders; bin Laden eventually figured that out.

LongTermGuy
04-07-2018, 08:23 AM
I'm so impressed with the strong action led by Britain (I assume) to throw out so MANY Russkie diplomats and spies all over the world, especially Europe. I didn't think they'd manage a strong reply to Russia's really dangerous and illegal and hostile biological weapon use in Western capitals. Well, London, anyway. But they did, and my opinion of Prime Minister May has gone up.

These latest sanctions are sort of an afterthought --- I'm reading that there really isn't anything else the West can do short of war to reply to these aggressions.

This is probably just a failure of imagination, however.

I think we need to rearm and get the military in gear, soonest. North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan --- if war isn't coming, I've wasted a lot of time reading history.

Probably from a direction that isn't any of these. Assassination of a prominent politician started both WWI and the Spanish Civil War. Sinking ships is good for starting wars --- the Spanish-American war and Vietnam, Tonkin Gulf, both worked. Not foolproof, though: North Korea sunk a SK ship, didn't work; and the Lusitania sunk by a German sub didn't work (the Lusitania was English, but Winston Churchill hoped the 125 drowned Americans would bring us into the war, but it didn't); and of course bin Laden hit the USS Cole after blowing up two of our embassies, but nobody cared. The big secret about America is that we don't care about anything that happens outside our borders; bin Laden eventually figured that out.



Great post mundame. :) ^^^

This part below has "mostly" changed now.

~ "The big secret about America is that we don't care about anything that happens outside our borders; bin Laden eventually figured that out."~


Now....Trump is involved with all these.....


https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/170412120201-mobapp-putin-trump-jinping-north-korea-super-tease.jpg
​http://cdn.images.dailystar.co.uk/dynamic/1/photos/155000/936x622/819155.jpg

Gunny
04-07-2018, 03:13 PM
I'm so impressed with the strong action led by Britain (I assume) to throw out so MANY Russkie diplomats and spies all over the world, especially Europe. I didn't think they'd manage a strong reply to Russia's really dangerous and illegal and hostile biological weapon use in Western capitals. Well, London, anyway. But they did, and my opinion of Prime Minister May has gone up.

These latest sanctions are sort of an afterthought --- I'm reading that there really isn't anything else the West can do short of war to reply to these aggressions.

This is probably just a failure of imagination, however.

I think we need to rearm and get the military in gear, soonest. North Korea, Iran, Russia, China, Pakistan --- if war isn't coming, I've wasted a lot of time reading history.

Probably from a direction that isn't any of these. Assassination of a prominent politician started both WWI and the Spanish Civil War. Sinking ships is good for starting wars --- the Spanish-American war and Vietnam, Tonkin Gulf, both worked. Not foolproof, though: North Korea sunk a SK ship, didn't work; and the Lusitania sunk by a German sub didn't work (the Lusitania was English, but Winston Churchill hoped the 125 drowned Americans would bring us into the war, but it didn't); and of course bin Laden hit the USS Cole after blowing up two of our embassies, but nobody cared. The big secret about America is that we don't care about anything that happens outside our borders; bin Laden eventually figured that out.If you have followed along Drummond's posts, Europe seems to take Russia seriously after it invaded Crimea. We really have it on the back burner, so to speak. Not to mention the poisoning happened in Europe (the UK). Russia is a much bigger threat to them than it is us. It's just some place "over there" to us.

I've actually been surprised at Trump's reluctance to confront Putin on the poisoning and on Syria. He's never at a loss for words about anything else. He had little choice but support NATO. US non-support, unlike Turkey's, would pull the plug on it, pretty much. He seems WAY more fixated in waging a financial war. Not surprising given his background.

Neither Russia nor the Middle East are going away, however.