PDA

View Full Version : Liberal Millennials, Not Surprisingly, Fail At Sex Too



jimnyc
11-19-2018, 02:09 PM
Not sure how true, nor do I care to read too far into it, I just found it hilarious when I read the headline!

And I hate to see this, but when I see the women screaming for abortion rights, against gun rights, a ton of Hillary supporters... well, not a pretty sight all the time.

---

Liberal Millennials, Not Surprisingly, Fail At Sex Too

According to the Atlantic, where I go for all my erotic 411, millennials lost the sexual revolution and they didn’t even fight in it. Why Are Young People Having So Little Sex?, it asks in its latest cover story. Sheesh, just look at them.

I guess what they desperately need is some advice from a retired Army guy in his 50s, because this retired Army guy in his 50s has demonstrated that he gets it done while those goofs half his age are swiping left toward eterna-celibacy.

Now, the fact that millennials are failing to reproduce would superficially seem like a good thing, but it is probably a bad thing for society when the younger generation is more interested in Instagram and Fortnite and endless adolescence than in doing the hard work of making babies and, you know, perpetuating the species.

Probably.

Wait, is this a political column? Is this topic political? Oh yeah. There’s a huge political component. Dems are always talking about demographics, but we Normals can take the initiative by doing what comes naturally while the future liberal elites are still trying to figure out each other’s pronouns. The Democrat Party is giving up on reproduction – it doesn’t help that they seem to be suspicious that anyone who actually carries a baby to term is sufficiently liberal. That’s why they want to import caravans of foreigners, to replace their dwindling voter base.

But why is it dwindling? Aren’t liberals supposed to be sexy and liberated? Well, it’s been a while since I dated one, but no. They are whiny, not sexy. They are the Ben Sasse of sexiness.

There are a lot of other causes for the millennial sex drought besides that last, terrifying image. Romance used to be fun and now it is fraught. Look at the sexual fascism sweeping the schools and workplaces where millennials dwell in which normal male/female interaction is labeled “sexual harassment” by the aspiring erotic Carrie Nations of the Progressive Junior Anti-Sex League who compete to turn even the most innocent flirtation into a hate crime.

Get this, from the Atlantic piece: “According to a November 2017 Economist/YouGov poll, 17 percent of Americans ages 18 to 29 now believe that a man inviting a woman out for a drink ‘always’ or ‘usually’ constitutes sexual harassment.” Well, that’s 17% of the population that self-selects out as too stupid to ever be loved.

There is also the issue of political selection. It turns out leftists’ big question in sizing up a potential mate is, “Does this person like the bad orange man?” A “no” to that question screens out the potent/fertile folks. Conservatives’ big question is, “Is this person an idiot?” Sadly, that kind of high bar is going to do a lot of disqualifying too.

And then there is the curse of screens. Technology is the root of all evil and most loneliness. Look, if you are staring at your iPhone all the time and texting people who are literally sitting at the restaurant table with you (Well, congratulations for at least leaving your mom’s basement – that’s something) then you are never going to graduate to the more advanced modes of interpersonal interaction.

Technology also means pornography, the seedy foundation of the internet. Onanism runs rampant among the young, apparently because it’s a lot more convenient than actually having human relationships. It’s not exactly conducive to reproduction.

Now, we all have friends who met their significant others on the dating sites, but the statistics are daunting. Unless you are a god or goddess, or whatever a gender-unspecified deity is called, then your chances of a match are ridiculously slim. Guys have to send out 100 whatever-you-call-thems – messages or swipes or whatever – to get one response. In contrast, women get bombarded with selfies, and not the nice kind.

It seems that, along the way, no one taught a lot of younger men that the way to a woman’s heart is not through a photo of your little friend. What the hell are people thinking?

Rest - https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2018/11/19/liberal-millennials-not-surprisingly-fail-at-sex-too-n2536135

Gunny
11-19-2018, 08:05 PM
Liberal Millennials, Not Surprisingly, Fail At Sex Too

One can only hope.

Black Diamond
11-19-2018, 08:07 PM
One can only hope.

Help me with an equation. The more gay millennials there are, the less they reproduce??

Abbey Marie
11-19-2018, 08:35 PM
Since time began, women have been attracted to strength, protection, and the general quality that we used to quaintly refer to as “manliness”.

Not man-buns and guys afraid of their own shadow. Girls ain’t itching to give it up for that.

Don’t believe little ol’ me? Just ask @SassyLady (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?u=83).

:coffee:

tailfins
11-19-2018, 08:41 PM
There may be hope. Some older members of Generation Z are looking at their Millennial parents and deciding that they don't want to be like that.

Abbey Marie
11-19-2018, 08:44 PM
Maybe a dumb question, but what precisely constitutes a millennial? Must they be born after 2000? (I’m asking because tailfins mentioned their children being old enough to have an opinion on their parents).

SassyLady
11-19-2018, 08:49 PM
Since time began, women have been attracted to strength, protection, and the general quality that we used to quaintly refer to as “manliness”.

Not man-buns and guys afraid of their own shadow. Girls ain’t itching to give it up for that.

Don’t believe little ol’ me? Just ask @SassyLady (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?u=83).

:coffee:

True!

Black Diamond
11-19-2018, 08:53 PM
Maybe a dumb question, but what precisely constitutes a millennial? Must they be born after 2000? (I’m asking because tailfins mentioned their children being old enough to have an opinion on their parents).

I have heard it said someone born 1985 or later. I disagree with that cutoff. Even if I say 1992 or later, though, I don't mean every single person born from 1992 until now.
Similarly The boomers were 1946 until 1962 I believe. Quite a range.

Black Diamond
11-19-2018, 08:54 PM
Since time began, women have been attracted to strength, protection, and the general quality that we used to quaintly refer to as “manliness”.

Not man-buns and guys afraid of their own shadow. Girls ain’t itching to give it up for that.

Don’t believe little ol’ me? Just ask @SassyLady (http://www.debatepolicy.com/member.php?u=83).

:coffee:

I like what you say but things seem to be changing.

Abbey Marie
11-19-2018, 09:46 PM
I have heard it said someone born 1985 or later. I disagree with that cutoff. Even if I say 1992 or later, though, I don't mean every single person born from 1992 until now.
Similarly The boomers were 1946 until 1962 I believe. Quite a range.

Yeah, Russ thought 1985. I had assumed it referred to people born in the millennium.

Abbey Marie
11-19-2018, 09:50 PM
Yeah, Russ thought 1985. I had assumed it referred to people born in the millennium.


Just read: Born between 1981-1996. Our daughter is a millennial...

Black Diamond
11-19-2018, 09:56 PM
Just read: Born between 1981-1996. Our daughter is a millennial...

I think the issues we have are more with people born in the later end of that range. And again when people say "damn millennials" or *damn boomers" they don't mean everyone under each label. Also, there's the squeaky wheel thing to consider.

Noir
11-20-2018, 01:59 AM
So according to the source the info is coming from -

“the percentage of high-school students who’d had intercourse dropped from 54 to 40 percent.”

So what’s the desire here - get more high schoolers to have sex?

Tyr-Ziu Saxnot
11-20-2018, 08:12 AM
So according to the source the info is coming from -

“the percentage of high-school students who’d had intercourse dropped from 54 to 40 percent.”

So what’s the desire here - get more high schoolers to have sex?

Desire could be to get more males to act like real men-- not panty-wasted, dumbfounded limp noodles.
Since males are by Nature and human biology the pursuers in such cases , how about they actually learn to pursue instead of playing video games,
indulging in other frivolous childhood activities all the way into their damn mid- thirties!
With that said, liberals have also helped ruin the girls too. They are being taught to enjoy each others private parts instead of what Nature and God intended.
We baby-boomers had no damn problem getting into the act of survival of the species. And that is because we were taught to be real men, --not pansy-ass punks. -Tyr

Noir
11-20-2018, 09:05 AM
Desire could be to get more males to act like real men-- not panty-wasted, dumbfounded limp noodles.
Since males are by Nature and human biology the pursuers in such cases , how about they actually learn to pursue instead of playing video games,
indulging in other frivolous childhood activities all the way into their damn mid- thirties!
With that said, liberals have also helped ruin the girls too. They are being taught to enjoy each others private parts instead of what Nature and God intended.
We baby-boomers had no damn problem getting into the act of survival of the species. And that is because we were taught to be real men, --not pansy-ass punks. -Tyr

Again, as per my quote from the source *this relates to high schoolers* Do you think a problem in today’s society is that not enough high schoolers are having sex?

jimnyc
11-20-2018, 03:00 PM
Today's "millennials" should be aged, from birthdates, no later than 1994-1996 or so, making them 22-24 year range.

Not sure where 'just high schoolers' came out of this story. Perhaps some? More so would be college. But hell, I don't even see 'high school' written in the article.

This is why it sucks when folks rip apart entire articles to find a particular sentence, and one I don't even see in this article. But even if, and I'd like to see the whole thing in context.

Either way, no one is saying what you're saying. Other than "men" turning less manly in man buns and being all about the queers and genders.

jimnyc
11-20-2018, 03:02 PM
Desire could be to get more males to act like real men-- not panty-wasted, dumbfounded limp noodles.

Maybe not in those exact words, but that is about how I see today's men on the left and what they stand for. They may need one of those manly women to be with them or help them one day. :laugh:

Noir
11-20-2018, 03:40 PM
Not sure where 'just high schoolers' came out of this story. Perhaps some? More so would be college. But hell, I don't even see 'high school' written in the article.


It’s not in the article you posted - it’s in the source article that that article is referencing. It’s not “just high schoolers” but a significant part of the article is talking about teens, high schoolers, and teen pregnancy. I guess for some reason the person writing the article didn’t feel they had to mention that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Black Diamond
11-20-2018, 03:55 PM
It’s not in the article you posted - it’s in the source article that that article is referencing. It’s not “just high schoolers” but a significant part of the article is talking about teens, high schoolers, and teen pregnancy. I guess for some reason the person writing the article didn’t feel they had to mention that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

As Abbey pointed out, high schoolers are not included in the millennial generation.

jimnyc
11-20-2018, 03:56 PM
It’s not in the article you posted - it’s in the source article that that article is referencing. It’s not “just high schoolers” but a significant part of the article is talking about teens, high schoolers, and teen pregnancy. I guess for some reason the person writing the article didn’t feel they had to mention that ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


Yes, the CDC referenced speaks of sexual trends and HIV testing.

They even stated that it was a relief for parents, that they were getting sexually active at a later age. - pointing out that in the space of one generation - it went from the majority having sex, to the minority having sex.

How that's somehow trying to get more high schoolers to have sex is beyond me.

Noir
11-20-2018, 04:09 PM
Yes, the CDC referenced speaks of sexual trends and HIV testing.

They even stated that it was a relief for parents, that they were getting sexually active at a later age. - pointing out that in the space of one generation - it went from the majority having sex, to the minority having sex.

How that's somehow trying to get more high schoolers to have sex is beyond me.

Because if you read this thread it being presented as a negative, which implies the opposite is positive.

Noir
11-20-2018, 04:10 PM
As Abbey pointed out, high schoolers are not included in the millennial generation.

Then the writer of the article in the OP chose the wrong title for their piece.

jimnyc
11-20-2018, 04:16 PM
Because if you read this thread it being presented as a negative, which implies the opposite is positive.

Read it however you like. Liberals have a habit if reading and seeing different things, and picking out one sentence or so, and rewriting articles.

But liberals failing at sex, at any age and in any numbers, is funny as hell, and not surprising given the many attitudes and stances and outright feminism.

tailfins
11-20-2018, 08:40 PM
So according to the source the info is coming from -

“the percentage of high-school students who’d had intercourse dropped from 54 to 40 percent.”

So what’s the desire here - get more high schoolers to have sex?

Nowadays, Yes! Back in the day, high schoolers didn't have sex because of virtue. Nowadays, it's because they are snowflakes. I bought a door lock for my youngest son, who is still in high school. I told him "good job" when he scored a girlfriend and convinced her to take advantage of the accommodations. One way for this generation to weed out frigid, snowflake chicks to jettison the ones that don't put out on the first date. They deserve bonus points for being prepared with an IUD.

If you're interested in being factually correct, high schoolers are Generation Z, not Millennials. As I already pointed out, some older Millenials have kids in high school and a few in college.

Gunny
11-20-2018, 09:56 PM
Someone wake me when Noir makes a relevant point :sleep: