PDA

View Full Version : Here’s What Beto Could Unleash on Trump



jimnyc
02-22-2019, 03:15 PM
Here’s What Beto Could Unleash on Trump

He almost beat Ted Cruz. Could he take down Donald Trump? Inside the radical campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke.

AUSTIN, Texas—With rain hammering outside, Zack Malitz stood in a warehouse space lit by strands of bistro lights and began to reveal the campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke in exacting detail. Malitz, who was the field director of O’Rourke’s Senate campaign, is a tall 30-year-old with thick glasses and a haircut that over the course of an election season can drift inexorably toward mopheadedness. He laid out the exact numbers of potential voters the campaign believed it should try to reach, how many of those voters had a cellphone contact available, and—with a bit of arithmetic—a critical sum that would drive the campaign's final push: the exact figure of volunteer phone-bank shifts he believed would be necessary to win the state.

This kind of granular campaign information is normally considered top secret, the kind of thing strategists guard behind passwords and fire underlings upon suspicion of leaking. If Malitz’s talk had resided in an encrypted PowerPoint presentation on a private server, it would have amounted to a creditable haul for a shift at the WikiLeaks home office. And if O’Rourke mounts a challenge to Donald Trump in 2020, that presentation may offer the purest encapsulation of how he might do it.

Yet Malitz was sharing it publicly, to hundreds of people who had seen an online call for supporters and decided to show up that day. It was September 15, less than two months before the Senate election, and nearly 2,000 people had registered for the stop on the campaign’s Plan to Win tour. More than 800 had ultimately traveled, through a rainstorm to a part of East Austin not known for available public parking, to attend.

“The plan to win is actually pretty simple,” Malitz said at the outset, his voice echoing from a handheld microphone. “Build a voter contact machine that enables thousands of volunteers in every single one of Texas’ 254 counties to have conversations with more voters across the state than any campaign in Texas history.”

For Democrats, that history was dismal. Malitz reminded his audience that the most recent presidential candidate to carry the state was Jimmy Carter, in 1976, and that no Democrat has won statewide office since 1994—the party’s longest losing streak in any state in the country. No Democrat running for Senate has come within even 10 percentage points of defeating an incumbent Republican in four decades. To construct a different fate in a midterm election, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to conjure 1 million votes from outside the current pool of active voters—in essence, create an entirely new electorate within the state’s borders.

This goal was so audacious that Malitz first had to convince his audience it was even demographically possible. He explained that the campaign’s data analysts had identified 5.5 million Texas voters who would be likely to support O’Rourke, but were not yet likely to vote in the 2018 election. The plan, he told his audience, was to go after every last one of them: at doorsteps, by text message and over phone calls launched by something Malitz called the Beto Dialer. All told, this would mean tens of millions of attempts to reach some of Texas’ most politically elusive citizens.

What was most radical was not the grandiosity of the rhetoric—lines about engaging everyone, especially nonvoters, are boilerplate in many Democratic speeches—but that a Texas Democrat could even have such a goal within his grasp. To meet it, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to pour fuel onto its already explosive growth, quickly adding thousands more unpaid callers, texters and block walkers to its ranks. The crowded rows before Malitz attested to the fact that O’Rourke could summon this level of volunteer manpower, but managing it all was a separate challenge. Building an organization of this scale might typically require months, even a year, of hiring and training field workers, then gradually seasoning them for new responsibilities. O’Rourke’s campaign had weeks.

Rest - https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/22/beto-orourke-campaign-strategy-2020-225193

High_Plains_Drifter
02-22-2019, 04:21 PM
It is SOOOOOO early to be speculating on this stuff... you really can't predict anything. Things change quickly in a presidential campaign, right up until the last MONTH before an election. It's TWO YEARS AWAY.

The Sage of Main Street
02-22-2019, 05:36 PM
Here’s What Beto Could Unleash on Trump

He almost beat Ted Cruz. Could he take down Donald Trump? Inside the radical campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke.

AUSTIN, Texas—With rain hammering outside, Zack Malitz stood in a warehouse space lit by strands of bistro lights and began to reveal the campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke in exacting detail. Malitz, who was the field director of O’Rourke’s Senate campaign, is a tall 30-year-old with thick glasses and a haircut that over the course of an election season can drift inexorably toward mopheadedness. He laid out the exact numbers of potential voters the campaign believed it should try to reach, how many of those voters had a cellphone contact available, and—with a bit of arithmetic—a critical sum that would drive the campaign's final push: the exact figure of volunteer phone-bank shifts he believed would be necessary to win the state.

This kind of granular campaign information is normally considered top secret, the kind of thing strategists guard behind passwords and fire underlings upon suspicion of leaking. If Malitz’s talk had resided in an encrypted PowerPoint presentation on a private server, it would have amounted to a creditable haul for a shift at the WikiLeaks home office. And if O’Rourke mounts a challenge to Donald Trump in 2020, that presentation may offer the purest encapsulation of how he might do it.

Yet Malitz was sharing it publicly, to hundreds of people who had seen an online call for supporters and decided to show up that day. It was September 15, less than two months before the Senate election, and nearly 2,000 people had registered for the stop on the campaign’s Plan to Win tour. More than 800 had ultimately traveled, through a rainstorm to a part of East Austin not known for available public parking, to attend.

“The plan to win is actually pretty simple,” Malitz said at the outset, his voice echoing from a handheld microphone. “Build a voter contact machine that enables thousands of volunteers in every single one of Texas’ 254 counties to have conversations with more voters across the state than any campaign in Texas history.”

For Democrats, that history was dismal. Malitz reminded his audience that the most recent presidential candidate to carry the state was Jimmy Carter, in 1976, and that no Democrat has won statewide office since 1994—the party’s longest losing streak in any state in the country. No Democrat running for Senate has come within even 10 percentage points of defeating an incumbent Republican in four decades. To construct a different fate in a midterm election, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to conjure 1 million votes from outside the current pool of active voters—in essence, create an entirely new electorate within the state’s borders.

This goal was so audacious that Malitz first had to convince his audience it was even demographically possible. He explained that the campaign’s data analysts had identified 5.5 million Texas voters who would be likely to support O’Rourke, but were not yet likely to vote in the 2018 election. The plan, he told his audience, was to go after every last one of them: at doorsteps, by text message and over phone calls launched by something Malitz called the Beto Dialer. All told, this would mean tens of millions of attempts to reach some of Texas’ most politically elusive citizens.

What was most radical was not the grandiosity of the rhetoric—lines about engaging everyone, especially nonvoters, are boilerplate in many Democratic speeches—but that a Texas Democrat could even have such a goal within his grasp. To meet it, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to pour fuel onto its already explosive growth, quickly adding thousands more unpaid callers, texters and block walkers to its ranks. The crowded rows before Malitz attested to the fact that O’Rourke could summon this level of volunteer manpower, but managing it all was a separate challenge. Building an organization of this scale might typically require months, even a year, of hiring and training field workers, then gradually seasoning them for new responsibilities. O’Rourke’s campaign had weeks.

Rest - https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/22/beto-orourke-campaign-strategy-2020-225193





The Bingo Gringo is copying strategy that is already obsolete. Using it in 2004, goofy snob Howard Dean overcame odds to become a viable candidate for awhile, but effective political science has gone far beyond that into Twittering and viral you-tubing of campaign rallies. Maybe it will be the embees' chance next, but the significance of the Whirled Wad of Wub has flopped at the launching pad. Too many duopoly dupes and zero true independents in this blogosphere.

Gunny
02-22-2019, 06:35 PM
Here’s What Beto Could Unleash on Trump

He almost beat Ted Cruz. Could he take down Donald Trump? Inside the radical campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke.

AUSTIN, Texas—With rain hammering outside, Zack Malitz stood in a warehouse space lit by strands of bistro lights and began to reveal the campaign strategy of Beto O’Rourke in exacting detail. Malitz, who was the field director of O’Rourke’s Senate campaign, is a tall 30-year-old with thick glasses and a haircut that over the course of an election season can drift inexorably toward mopheadedness. He laid out the exact numbers of potential voters the campaign believed it should try to reach, how many of those voters had a cellphone contact available, and—with a bit of arithmetic—a critical sum that would drive the campaign's final push: the exact figure of volunteer phone-bank shifts he believed would be necessary to win the state.

This kind of granular campaign information is normally considered top secret, the kind of thing strategists guard behind passwords and fire underlings upon suspicion of leaking. If Malitz’s talk had resided in an encrypted PowerPoint presentation on a private server, it would have amounted to a creditable haul for a shift at the WikiLeaks home office. And if O’Rourke mounts a challenge to Donald Trump in 2020, that presentation may offer the purest encapsulation of how he might do it.

Yet Malitz was sharing it publicly, to hundreds of people who had seen an online call for supporters and decided to show up that day. It was September 15, less than two months before the Senate election, and nearly 2,000 people had registered for the stop on the campaign’s Plan to Win tour. More than 800 had ultimately traveled, through a rainstorm to a part of East Austin not known for available public parking, to attend.

“The plan to win is actually pretty simple,” Malitz said at the outset, his voice echoing from a handheld microphone. “Build a voter contact machine that enables thousands of volunteers in every single one of Texas’ 254 counties to have conversations with more voters across the state than any campaign in Texas history.”

For Democrats, that history was dismal. Malitz reminded his audience that the most recent presidential candidate to carry the state was Jimmy Carter, in 1976, and that no Democrat has won statewide office since 1994—the party’s longest losing streak in any state in the country. No Democrat running for Senate has come within even 10 percentage points of defeating an incumbent Republican in four decades. To construct a different fate in a midterm election, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to conjure 1 million votes from outside the current pool of active voters—in essence, create an entirely new electorate within the state’s borders.

This goal was so audacious that Malitz first had to convince his audience it was even demographically possible. He explained that the campaign’s data analysts had identified 5.5 million Texas voters who would be likely to support O’Rourke, but were not yet likely to vote in the 2018 election. The plan, he told his audience, was to go after every last one of them: at doorsteps, by text message and over phone calls launched by something Malitz called the Beto Dialer. All told, this would mean tens of millions of attempts to reach some of Texas’ most politically elusive citizens.

What was most radical was not the grandiosity of the rhetoric—lines about engaging everyone, especially nonvoters, are boilerplate in many Democratic speeches—but that a Texas Democrat could even have such a goal within his grasp. To meet it, O’Rourke’s campaign would need to pour fuel onto its already explosive growth, quickly adding thousands more unpaid callers, texters and block walkers to its ranks. The crowded rows before Malitz attested to the fact that O’Rourke could summon this level of volunteer manpower, but managing it all was a separate challenge. Building an organization of this scale might typically require months, even a year, of hiring and training field workers, then gradually seasoning them for new responsibilities. O’Rourke’s campaign had weeks.

Rest - https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/22/beto-orourke-campaign-strategy-2020-225193He IS popular here with the Dimbulbs. Especially Hispandex dimbulbs.

He is dangerous. He is definitely one of the just straight-up, lie to your face and not flinch at the fact everyone knows he's lying Dems. He lost and you'd think he won the way he's been carrying on since losing.

aboutime
02-22-2019, 07:33 PM
Anyone remember all of the FAKE NEWS predictions about Hillary Bound to Win. No doubt, Take that to the BANK???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CQEIvzjyDQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zerWCVpXTr8

Abbey Marie
02-22-2019, 07:58 PM
He strikes me as another Kennedy/Clinton type in the sense that he’s in it for the ladies.

Gunny
02-22-2019, 08:17 PM
He strikes me as another Kennedy/Clinton type in the sense that he’s in it for the ladies.Possibly. Off the top of my head I know he is pro-gay/whatever, and wants to ban AR-15s outright. He is definitely in line with this newer wave of newer progressives.

I say he's dangerous because of exactly what you stated. He has that appeal in the Cult of Personality sweepstakes the Dems prefer to "qualified". The local Mexican-Americans love him. Damned bumper stickers were everywhere. Oh and don't forget the yard signs :rolleyes:

Elessar
02-22-2019, 09:50 PM
QUOTE=Gunny;927131 He IS popular here with the Dimbulbs. Especially Hispandex dimbulbs.

He is dangerous. He is definitely one of the just straight-up, lie to your face and no

Sounds like Hillary, may she rot in her afterlife.

(Pardon the errors....PC is acting up...new one on the way)

Gunny
02-23-2019, 12:11 PM
Sounds like Hillary, may she rot in her afterlife.

(Pardon the errors....PC is acting up...new one on the way)Yeah, I don't know what you did. That's my best fix without breaking out the slide-rule :laugh:

If I could have voted twice against him for the Senate, I would have. I have no real moral issue with cheating cheaters.

Russ
02-23-2019, 02:29 PM
It was mostly close because of a lot of out-of-state Dem money pouring into Beta O'Rourke's campaign chest just because they thought there was a chance to unseat Cruz. There is no substance to O'Rourke, just a big smile with no head behind it.

Keep in mind this is the guy who is on record saying we should remove the border walls that are already in place. What an idiot.

Gunny
02-23-2019, 03:01 PM
It was mostly close because of a lot of out-of-state Dem money pouring into Beta O'Rourke's campaign chest just because they thought there was a chance to unseat Cruz. There is no substance to O'Rourke, just a big smile with no head behind it.

Keep in mind this is the guy who is on record saying we should remove the border walls that are already in place. What an idiot.The propaganda wing made it appear close, but they don't understand Texas politics. The cities in this state are the blue areas. The state is large enough for the real people that occupy most of it to offset them.

It was not as close as presented. Not only did O'Rourke not win here, but he lost to Cruz who has less than enthusiastic popularity. I thought if anyone was going to upset Cruz it would be Cruz.

High_Plains_Drifter
02-24-2019, 05:23 AM
Tucker Carlson said bernie "combs his hair with a balloon"... :laugh: