View Full Version : More that Hillary should have been investigated/charged on
jimnyc
03-13-2019, 07:08 AM
Who was in charge? Who was unearthing crap? Who was financing many of these things? There's just SO much wrong with all of this, an investigation is almost mandatory, IMO. We should know much more about why she was almost charged, and why it was denied.
---
Leaked Lisa Page Testimony Reveals FBI Was Considering Charging Crooked Hillary under Espionage Act Until DOJ Told Them “No”
On Friday Republican Doug Collins (R-GA) released the Bruce Ohr testimony transcript online.
Rep Collins said his patience with the DOJ had grown thin so he released the testimony.
Collins plans on releasing more testimony.
The Ohr testimony disclosed the Bruce Ohr gave his wife’s opposition research on Trump to the FBI in a flash drive.
On Tuesday Rep. Doug Collins released the Lisa Page testimony online. (https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf)
The testimony released today revealed the FBI was considering charging HIllary Clinton under the Espionage Act until the Department of Justice told them “no.”
https://i.imgur.com/2pbwDeK.png
The Examiner reported: (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lisa-page-said-fbi-discussed-charging-hillary-clinton-with-gross-negligence-in-2016-and-doj-told-them-no)
Former FBI lawyer Lisa Page testified last year that officials in the bureau, including then-FBI Director James Comey, discussed Espionage Act charges against Hillary Clinton, citing “gross negligence,” but the Justice Department shut them down.
Newly released transcripts from Page’s private testimony in front of a joint task force of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees in July 2018 sheds new light on the internal discussions about an investigation into Clinton’s emails. This goes back to the FBI’s “Midyear Exam” investigation, which looked into whether Clinton committed crimes when she sent and received classified information on her unauthorized private email server while serving as secretary of state.
Comey cleared Clinton of all charges in a press conference on July 5, 2016.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/leaked-lisa-page-testimony-reveals-fbi-was-considering-charging-crooked-hillary-under-espionage-act-until-doj-told-them-no/
Gunny
03-13-2019, 07:18 AM
I want to see her investigated with just half the time, effort and money they've sunk into investigating Russian collusion. I WON'T hold my breath :rolleyes:
jimnyc
03-13-2019, 07:26 AM
I want to see her investigated with just half the time, effort and money they've sunk into investigating Russian collusion. I WON'T hold my breath :rolleyes:
Yup, and I don't get it. I can fully understand the left resisting at all costs - but where is the right in starting these investigations?
Elessar
03-13-2019, 07:27 AM
It appears there is more than a handful of people that need to be investigated and
indicted for obstruction of justice and conspiring to obstruct justice.
It needs to be a 'from the top down' investigation to include Bill Clinton and perhaps
Obama himself if information leans that way.
jimnyc
03-13-2019, 07:58 AM
Another angle. Maybe this WILL be enough to prompt others?
Lisa Page: Obama DOJ Ordered FBI Not to Prosecute Hillary Clinton
Former FBI legal counsel Lisa Page testified to Congress that the Justice Department ordered the FBI not to charge former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with “gross negligence” by mishandling classified information.
Transcripts of Page’s closed-door testimony in July 2018 were released Tuesday by Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) on Tuesday, which included the following exchange with Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX):
RATCLIFFE: So let me if I can, I know I’m testing your memory. But when you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to …
PAGE: That is correct.
RATFLIFFE: …bring a case based on that.
Ratcliffe highlighted the exchange on Twitter.
https://i.imgur.com/5DaXFwD.png
Page confirmed that the Department of Justice led by Attorney General Loretta Lynch had “multiple conversations” about charging Clinton with gross negligence but noted that it would be a rare decision.
“[T]hey did not feel they could sustain a charge,” she said, referring to the Department of Justice.
President Donald Trump reacted to the reports on Wednesday.
“The just revealed FBI Agent Lisa Page transcripts make the Obama Justice Department look exactly like it was, a broken and corrupt machine,” he wrote. “Hopefully, justice will finally be served. Much more to come!”
https://i.imgur.com/PWxUPB2.png
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/03/13/lisa-page-obama-doj-ordered-fbi-not-to-prosecute-hillary-clinton/
Gunny
03-13-2019, 08:05 AM
Yup, and I don't get it. I can fully understand the left resisting at all costs - but where is the right in starting these investigations?I don't get it either. As I have stated previously (called ranting :laugh:), any of us would be in prison already for mishandling classified info regardless any other charges/complaints.
Hillary Clinton is a Mafia don getting away with it and wearing that ring under everybody's noses. At least they finally got John Gotti.
jimnyc
03-13-2019, 08:20 AM
Lisa Page testimony may have put Obama AG Loretta Lynch in the crosshairs
Republican Georgia Rep. Doug Collins released the private testimony of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, but it’s former Attorney General Loretta Lynch who may feel the sting.
According to Page’s testimony, which was made public on Tuesday, the FBI considered charging former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton with gross negligence under 18 U.S. Code § 793 for her alleged handling of classified information.
“We had multiple conversations with the Justice Department about bringing a gross negligence charge,” Page told Republican Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe. “And that’s, as I said, the advice that we got from the Department was that they did not think — that it was constitutionally vague and not sustainable.”
Ratcliffe responded, “When you say advice you got from the Department, you’re making it sound like it was the Department that told you: ‘You’re not going to charge gross negligence because we’re the prosecutors and we’re telling you we’re not going to.'”
“That’s correct,” Page answered.
But if Page were telling the truth, and the FBI did recommend possible charges against Clinton, then Lynch may not have been telling the truth when she said that she would “accept their recommendations.”
https://i.imgur.com/KK61pJ7.png
Rest - https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/12/lisa-page-testimony-stings-loretta-lynch/
High_Plains_Drifter
03-13-2019, 10:28 AM
Ya know they're all GUILTY AS SIN, but will they ever be investigated and/or put in prison? Probably not, unfortunately, the republicans in charge don't seem to have a SPINE.
For the LIFE of me... I am just DUMBFOUNDED WHY the republicans DON'T FIGHT BACK. It's as though they just LAY DOWN AND TAKE, even when the ones giving them the business are as CORRUPT AS HELL, AND THEY KNOW IT. It's MIND BOGGLING.
Gunny
03-13-2019, 11:05 AM
If I was the left (lotta "if" involved there :)), I think I'd be inclined to throw Hitlery under the bus. It deflects from the other idiots and gives the MSM something to keep on Page 1 other than other leftwingnut shenanigans.
High_Plains_Drifter
03-13-2019, 11:48 AM
If I was the left (lotta "if" involved there :)), I think I'd be inclined to throw Hitlery under the bus. It deflects from the other idiots and gives the MSM something to keep on Page 1 other than other leftwingnut shenanigans.
They won't though. They don't throw their own under the bus. They circle the wagons and protect them at all cost.
Look at the 3 little radical shyster female democrats that just got elected, and the outlandish crap they've all pulled so far. Any of them get reprimanded? Any get demoted, taken off a committee? Any of them suffer ANY kind of punishment? Nope. The dems protected them, even though one of those little young clowns threatened the dem leadership.
STTAB
03-13-2019, 12:16 PM
Who was in charge? Who was unearthing crap? Who was financing many of these things? There's just SO much wrong with all of this, an investigation is almost mandatory, IMO. We should know much more about why she was almost charged, and why it was denied.
---
Leaked Lisa Page Testimony Reveals FBI Was Considering Charging Crooked Hillary under Espionage Act Until DOJ Told Them “No”
On Friday Republican Doug Collins (R-GA) released the Bruce Ohr testimony transcript online.
Rep Collins said his patience with the DOJ had grown thin so he released the testimony.
Collins plans on releasing more testimony.
The Ohr testimony disclosed the Bruce Ohr gave his wife’s opposition research on Trump to the FBI in a flash drive.
On Tuesday Rep. Doug Collins released the Lisa Page testimony online. (https://dougcollins.house.gov/sites/dougcollins.house.gov/files/Lisa%20Page%20interview%20Day%202.pdf)
The testimony released today revealed the FBI was considering charging HIllary Clinton under the Espionage Act until the Department of Justice told them “no.”
https://i.imgur.com/2pbwDeK.png
The Examiner reported: (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lisa-page-said-fbi-discussed-charging-hillary-clinton-with-gross-negligence-in-2016-and-doj-told-them-no)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/leaked-lisa-page-testimony-reveals-fbi-was-considering-charging-crooked-hillary-under-espionage-act-until-doj-told-them-no/
I cant stop wondering why reporters cant stop being dishonest. Comey did NOT clear Hillary of any wrong doing, in fact the opposite. In his press conference Comey actually did say that Hillary violated the law, he then went on to say no reasonable prosecutor would bring charges. That is not the same thing as saying "she didn't break the law"
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.