PDA

View Full Version : Supreme Court Sides With Trump over Sanctuary Cities in Deportation Case



jimnyc
03-19-2019, 12:46 PM
Another day and another great decision from our lovely supreme court! And this is reversed from the 9th out of SanFran!! I think though, that it simply makes sense to hold such criminals accountable as such. Don't come here illegally, and then don't be retarded and commit crimes on top of that crime!

---

Supreme Court Sides With Trump over Sanctuary Cities in Deportation Case

The US Supreme Court sided with President Trump over sanctuary cities today in a 5-4 decision.

The court ruled the government has the power to detain people who are facing deportation because of the crimes they committed.

Chief Justice John Roberts joined justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh in the majority.

Bloomberg.com reported:


A divided U.S. Supreme Court bolstered the government’s power to detain people who are facing deportation because of crimes they committed, siding with the Trump administration in a clash with implications for so-called sanctuary cities.

The case focused on non-citizen legal residents who serve a criminal sentence, get released and later are arrested by federal immigration agents.

The 5-4 ruling Tuesday said those people aren’t entitled to a bond hearing, and the possibility of re-release, while the Homeland Security Department presses its case for deportation. The ruling reversed a decision by the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

In announcing the decision from the bench, Justice Samuel Alito said the lower court had made a “policy judgment” using reasoning that “makes a mockery” of the federal immigration laws…

…Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined the majority, but they splintered in their reasoning.

Thomas and Gorsuch didn’t agree with all of Alito’s opinion. They said courts lack power to consider issues involving the detention of non-citizens until those people are facing a deportation order.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/03/breaking-supreme-court-sides-with-trump-over-sanctuary-cities-in-deportation-case/

LongTermGuy
03-19-2019, 03:50 PM
Nice!...5-4? Still to close for comfort....

Abbey Marie
03-19-2019, 04:28 PM
The fact that this even needed to be adjudicated, is absurd.

STTAB
03-20-2019, 08:28 AM
The fact that this even needed to be adjudicated, is absurd.

This is why keeping the Dems out of power is so important, we need as many honest judges and justices as we can get nominated and confirmed, honestly everything else the Dems do can be reversed, but if they have control of the judiciary........

Elessar
03-20-2019, 10:05 AM
The fact that this even needed to be adjudicated, is absurd.

You are right.

The Constitution and the accompanying U.S. Code of Federal Regulations make the
LAW quite clear.

Why liberals insist on being contrary is childish.

Abbey Marie
03-20-2019, 12:30 PM
This is why keeping the Dems out of power is so important, we need as many honest judges and justices as we can get nominated and confirmed, honestly everything else the Dems do can be reversed, but if they have control of the judiciary........

This is exactly what some of us identified during the Presidential election, as the single most important issue. And when Trump published the pool of conservative judges from which he would nominate, I was all in.

Elessar
03-20-2019, 04:40 PM
This is exactly what some of us identified during the Presidential election, as the single most important issue. And when Trump published the pool of conservative judges from which he would nominate, I was all in.

liberals cannot grasp the LAW. They only gasp at it and try to subvert it.
Obama, Hillary, Pelosi for examples.