PDA

View Full Version : Pelosi: 'President of the United States Is Engaged in a Cover-up'



jimnyc
05-22-2019, 01:59 PM
There is no doubt in my mind, as I've been reading, that the Democrats plan on officially starting the impeachment process against Trump.

Pelosi knew full well that neither collusion or obstruction would get them there, and would likely harm the 2020 election.

So now what they will do is bring in this cover-up stuff. Ok, I'll listen - so long as they actually release evidence, and not just say "cover-up" and say not much more. It's intent is to help them in all of the elections. UNLESS they show evidence of this cover-up, then my take may change.

By look who's involved here? LOL

Suddenly they believe no one is above the law, like Pete will likely claim now short of facts - while they all whistled into the wind while the Dems were above the law.

Elijah Cummings is a loud mouthpiece without evidence - and Maxine Waters is the worst of them all. Adam Schiff claimed over and over and over for 2 years he SAW physical evidence - but to date never released anything. And I'm supposed to believe that schmuck now? And Jerry Nadler, another one that just barked and barked and barked, but had no bite when it came to facts and evidence.

---

Pelosi: 'We Believe That the President of the United States Is Engaged in a Cover-up'

(CNSNews.com) - House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) emerged from a meeting with her fellow Democrats Wednesday morning, telling reporters "we were exchanging information and points of view" on the various investigations focusing on all things Trump.

"Would you believe that it's important to follow the facts?" Pelosi said on her way to a meeting with President Trump.

"We believe that no one is above the law, including the president of the United States. And we believe the president of the United States is engaged in a cover-up -- in a cover-up. And that was the nature of the meeting."

At that closed-door meeting, no fewer than five Democrat committee chairs -- Elijah Cummings (Oversight and Reform), Maxine Waters (House Financial Services), Adam Schiff (Intelligence), Richard Neal (Ways and Means) and Jerry Nadler (Judiciary) gave presentations, which Pelosi called "impressive."

Pelosi has tried to quell growing calls from Democrats to start impeachment proceedings, but it's not clear that she's succeeding.

Rest - https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/pelosi-we-believe-president-united-states-engaged-cover

icansayit
05-22-2019, 03:18 PM
Pelosi has probably been threatened by that Lovely Socialist Caucus of Dems in the House....telling her...IF YOU WANT TO REMAIN SPEAKER...Do it our way, or you will be Voted Out, Down, and sent to the DNC Rest Home for the Mentally Troubled TDS victims.

https://newrightnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/TRUMP_EFFECT-560x315.jpg

High_Plains_Drifter
05-22-2019, 05:02 PM
Cover up of WHAT? A crime that was NEVER COMMITTED?

These fuckers are OUT TO FREAKIN' LUNCH, PERIOD.

I guarantee this BACKFIRES. I think the American people see through it and are SICK OF IT.

2020 will be a BLOOD BATH for dems again. They're going to LOSE and LOSE BIG. They can kiss control of congress GOOD-FRICKIN-BYE.

Abbey Marie
05-22-2019, 06:16 PM
Jim, you are more patient than I. I’m not listening to a word these clowns say anymore.
It’s actually fascinating to see how far they will take this attempted coup. For that is exactly what this is.

jimnyc
05-22-2019, 07:06 PM
Cover up of WHAT? A crime that was NEVER COMMITTED?

These fuckers are OUT TO FREAKIN' LUNCH, PERIOD.

I guarantee this BACKFIRES. I think the American people see through it and are SICK OF IT.

2020 will be a BLOOD BATH for dems again. They're going to LOSE and LOSE BIG. They can kiss control of congress GOOD-FRICKIN-BYE.

They'll stick with obstruction, and then others not cooperating where they have no need to, which of course will be his fault too. They will build an obstruction case on their obstruction accusations probably!! :laugh:

I think the majority see through all of this crap, and short of some monster devastating evidence, it will haunt them in their elections.

Elessar
05-22-2019, 07:13 PM
Point of Order.

I think these liberals are barking up the wrong trees.

However, Pete has not come into this thread and commented.

Kinda wrong to bring up a name that has not responded to a thread.

jimnyc
05-22-2019, 07:16 PM
He HAS been in and read the thread though. He's been a lurker... but wait until the Dems make their next move.... :laugh:

jimnyc
05-22-2019, 07:18 PM
With Barr and Durham out for blood, and names being named, like I said...

---

Bernie Sanders: ‘It May Well Be Time’ to Begin Trump Impeachment Proceedings

Wednesday on CNN’s “The Lead,” Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) said it was time for the House Judiciary Committee to begin impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.

Sanders said, “To be very honest with you, Jake, I am not sure that this president may not want to be impeached. He may think that it works for him politically. I don’t know that, but it wouldn’t shock me. I think he is a 100% political animal. Doesn’t spend a whole lot of time worrying about health care or education, certainly not about climate change. So I don’t know what goes on in his mind.”

He added, “But I think if he continues to not understand the Constitution of the United States, the separation of powers, the fact that the Congress has every right to subpoena, and it is the job of the administration to attend the hearings that the Congress is calling, if he doesn’t understand that, it may well be time for an impeachment inquiry to begin. Where the Judiciary Committee begins to determine whether or not there are grounds for impeachment.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/05/22/bernie-sanders-it-may-well-be-time-to-begin-trump-impeachment-proceedings/

jimnyc
05-22-2019, 07:19 PM
Point of Order.

I think these liberals are barking up the wrong trees.

However, Pete has not come into this thread and commented.

Kinda wrong to bring up a name that has not responded to a thread.

OTHERWISE, my comments aside, I do believe normally folks should be left out if they ain't involved. But sometimes Pete is a special cookie.