PDA

View Full Version : Just a 'little more' on whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella



jimnyc
11-12-2019, 07:52 PM
If you follow the link, the majority of these have links to back them up. Admittedly just laziness on my end!!

But as I bold the important stuff as I posted it below, the more I am left shaking my head again at the obvious connections this guy has. And then the actions he has been involved with in this past. And them not wanting his name out there to be researched, and his connections and involvements not being discussed - seems like the obvious way for them to go. Did they really not think all of this was going to come out? And then an attorney with desires of a coup, and a rather weird history himself. That's just the WB and the attorney. Schiff needs to be investigated every which way til we get the entire truth. The whole way this has been ran. Pelosi needs to be brought in too, since she's in charge of this crap. Who possibly changed house rules. SO SO SO many questions, and very little answers.

Don't underestimate the American public, who will be watching and have a lot to say. And I do think some tough republicans that will show up, and will ask the tough shit & ultimately folks will be getting subpoenas, whether now or in the senate. Careers will be made or destroyed.

And if this charade continues, and the one sided continues... and refusals for witnesses top testify continue to happen while they in turn subpoena people. The hypocrisy... oh, there's that word again.

And it doesn't matter? All these connections don't matter? All the work together over the past few years won't matter? Everything that continues to be hidden doesn't matter? All these things that I read here and in the news and other places seem to be under the impression that the left can go basically do or say as they please on all of these subjects, and little will matter. Rude Awakening, was a great and funny movie too!

--

The Complete List of DNC “Whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella’s Ties to Top Democrats WILL SHOCK YOU!

CIA snitch Eric Ciaramella filed a whistleblower complaint on August 12 over President Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky where the two discussed ferreting out corruption. This included talk on the Biden crime family.

** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.

** Ciaramella coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.

** Schiff’s staff recommended attorneys for the so called “whistleblower.”

** Ciaramella was kicked out of the White House for leaking negative stories about Donald Trump in 2017.

** Trump-hater Ciaramella was behind the fake story that Putin told Trump to fire Comey — a COMPLETE FAKE NEWS STORY from 2017!

** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.

** The attorneys for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.

** Ciaramella worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.

** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.

** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.

Abigail Grace, who worked at the NSC until 2018, was hired by Schiff in February.

Sean Misko, an NSC aide until 2017, joined Schiff’s committee staff in August, the same month the whistleblower submitted his complaint.

And Schiff kept this a secret from Republicans while he was working with Eric Ciaramella before he filed his complaint in August.

The same conservative groups who came together to file an ethics complaint against Nancy Pelosi should do one against the two former NSA staffers who are now working for Rep. Adam Schiff in his office on the sham impeachment hearings.

Abigail Grace and Sean Misko are alleged to have coordinated with Eric Ciamarella to manipulate the rules on here-say and help create the fraudulent whistleblower complaint.

Eric Ciamarella is also alleged to be the conduit to leak the phone call information from whistleblower Number 2 Alexander Vindman who testified in the secret basement star chamber on Tuesday.

It is apparent already that this was an attempted coup of the US president.

Wait until the American public find out how much they have been lied to!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/must-read-the-complete-list-of-dnc-whistleblower-eric-ciaramellas-conflicts-of-interests-will-shock-you/

pete311
11-13-2019, 09:20 AM
Why does any of this matter? The IG and DNI found his complaint urgent and credible and several career diplomats have backed it up and more.

STTAB
11-13-2019, 09:58 AM
Why does any of this matter? The IG and DNI found his complaint urgent and credible and several career diplomats have backed it up and more.

Why do you continue saying this? It isn't even true. The DNI looked at it and said "there is nothing here" and that's why it wasn't turned over to Congress. That's a factual matter you dumbshit, the complaint was NEVER turned over to Congress becauase the DNI did not think it needed to be. Congress still hasn't seen the complaint, and they dropped their demand to see it when Trump just made the transcript of the call public.

As for what several career diplomats have "confirmed" that's a BS lie told by dishonest Democrats as well. All that these career diplomats have given Congress is their OPINION. Some of them are of the opinion that Trump did something wrong, some are not. And it's as plain as your lies that the ones who think he did something wrong all oppose him politically. IOW they don't really think Trump did anything wrong, they just oppose his policy decisions .

No one has produced one single tangible fact that could be used to say "Trump insisted on _________ before releasing aid" in fact, quite the opposite there are actual existing text messages between bureaucrats from that time when they were texting each other "POTUS says NO quid pro quo"

But , we already know you are also full of shit and don't really care whether anyone insisted on a quid pro quo or not, otherwise you would be INSISTING that Biden be investigated for holding back foreign aid until the prosecutor looking into Hunter's company was fired.

I knew you couldn't turn over a new leaf and start being a honest debater.

pete311
11-13-2019, 10:31 AM
Why do you continue saying this? It isn't even true. The DNI looked at it and said "there is nothing here" and that's why it wasn't turned over to Congress. That's a factual matter you dumbshit, the complaint was NEVER turned over to Congress becauase the DNI did not think it needed to be. Congress still hasn't seen the complaint, and they dropped their demand to see it when Trump just made the transcript of the call public.

As for what several career diplomats have "confirmed" that's a BS lie told by dishonest Democrats as well. All that these career diplomats have given Congress is their OPINION. Some of them are of the opinion that Trump did something wrong, some are not. And it's as plain as your lies that the ones who think he did something wrong all oppose him politically. IOW they don't really think Trump did anything wrong, they just oppose his policy decisions .

No one has produced one single tangible fact that could be used to say "Trump insisted on _________ before releasing aid" in fact, quite the opposite there are actual existing text messages between bureaucrats from that time when they were texting each other "POTUS says NO quid pro quo"

But , we already know you are also full of shit and don't really care whether anyone insisted on a quid pro quo or not, otherwise you would be INSISTING that Biden be investigated for holding back foreign aid until the prosecutor looking into Hunter's company was fired.

I knew you couldn't turn over a new leaf and start being a honest debater.

You're just wrong
https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG%20News/2019/September%2030%20-%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblowe r%20Complaints/ICIG%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleb lower%20Complaints.pdf

The testimonies are all released, you clearly have not read them.

STTAB
11-13-2019, 12:36 PM
You're just wrong
https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG%20News/2019/September%2030%20-%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleblowe r%20Complaints/ICIG%20Statement%20on%20Processing%20of%20Whistleb lower%20Complaints.pdf

The testimonies are all released, you clearly have not read them.


I'm not wrong. Those folks are testifying about their OPINION

I'm also not wrong that we have Joe Biden on tape admitting that he withheld foreign aid until Ukraine fired someone he wanted fired and you don't give a shit about that. So stop pretending like you really think it is inappropriate for to withhold foreign aid until a foreign government does what we want them to do. And by we, I mean our representatives , including the President IE Trump.

del
11-13-2019, 03:30 PM
Why do you continue saying this? It isn't even true. The DNI looked at it and said "there is nothing here" and that's why it wasn't turned over to Congress. That's a factual matter you dumbshit, the complaint was NEVER turned over to Congress becauase the DNI did not think it needed to be. Congress still hasn't seen the complaint, and they dropped their demand to see it when Trump just made the transcript of the call public.

As for what several career diplomats have "confirmed" that's a BS lie told by dishonest Democrats as well. All that these career diplomats have given Congress is their OPINION. Some of them are of the opinion that Trump did something wrong, some are not. And it's as plain as your lies that the ones who think he did something wrong all oppose him politically. IOW they don't really think Trump did anything wrong, they just oppose his policy decisions .

No one has produced one single tangible fact that could be used to say "Trump insisted on _________ before releasing aid" in fact, quite the opposite there are actual existing text messages between bureaucrats from that time when they were texting each other "POTUS says NO quid pro quo"

But , we already know you are also full of shit and don't really care whether anyone insisted on a quid pro quo or not, otherwise you would be INSISTING that Biden be investigated for holding back foreign aid until the prosecutor looking into Hunter's company was fired.

I knew you couldn't turn over a new leaf and start being a honest debater.

You really should avoid talking about honesty in debate until you actually display some..

September 25:

The whistleblower complaint at the center of the latest standoff between President Trump and Beltway Democrats has been delivered to select members of Congress.
Members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Sen. Richard Burr (R-North Carolina) will now review the confidential tip, though it’s not immediately clear how extensively the version they received is redacted.
The complaint had been in the hands of Joseph Maguire, the acting director of National Intelligence, who is set to testify Thursday on Capitol Hill.

https://nypost.com/2019/09/25/whistleblower-complaint-turned-over-to-select-members-of-congress/