NY Times absolves Biden

[jimnyc]

When did they do a thorough investigation? They talked to everyone? No they did not. They did no such investigation, just light work and then lies and absolving him.

And now, no investigation or congress needs to know more - that's it? And the left and Biden will now claim it's already been investigated? What BS. Maybe he should drop out if he can't even address this entirely or no one will properly investigate this. Seems like a coverup if you ask me, and that's not what innocent people do.

And now Stacey Abrams is running with the same, she's satisfied and it's been proven false and it's been proven not reliable. Again, they aren't even questioning anyone including the victim herself!

And "talking points" when it comes to a sexual assault? Doesn't sound right to me. Who the hell relies on a known lying medium to investigate something? Something so leaning.

What they are also not telling you, and once again even state it below that none - but he has had a total of 7 other women accuse him of wrongful touching. And hell, I think I saw about 7,000 children over the years that should sue him for his weird touching and sniffing them.

--

Biden Campaign Publishes Talking Points for Dem Candidates to Discredit Tara Reade

Just as his path to the Democratic nomination is clear, former Vice President Joe Biden faces questions in regards to allegations of sexual misconduct from former aide to then-Senator Biden, Tara Reade. Democrats and Biden’s allies on the cable news circuit have done their best to cover for the former vice president, but the credibility of Reade’s story continues to grow as her claims are bolstered by evidence and corroboration.

Democrats threw out their original “believe all women” standard for misconduct allegations that was spearheaded by Senate Democrats during their character assassination of Justice Brett Kavanaugh in the fall of 2018, and have moved to damage control mode in order to shield Biden from accountability to these claims.

Buzzfeed originally published talking points for Democratic candidates that were drawn up by the Biden campaign. The memo instructs Democrats to categorically deny Reade’s claims and stand in solidarity with the former vice president if asked about the allegations:


“Biden believes that all women have the right to be heard and to have their claims thoroughly reviewed,” the talking points read, according to a copy sent to two Democratic operatives. “In this case, a thorough review by the New York Times has led to the truth: this incident did not happen.”

“Here’s the bottom line,” they read. “Vice President Joe Biden has spent over 40 years in public life: 36 years in the Senate; 7 Senate campaigns, 2 previous presidential runs, two vice presidential campaigns, and 8 years in the White House. There has never been a complaint, allegation, hint or rumor of any impropriety or inappropriate conduct like this regarding him — ever.”

Rest - https://townhall.com/tipsheet/reaganmccarthy/2020/04/29/buzzfeed-publishes-biden-campaign-talking-points-on-tara-reade-n2567847

[jimnyc]

And more... Slowly picking up speed as they talk to more. But they is barely anyone that matters. The MSM and the entire left, EVERY last one, couldn't care less. HYPOCRITES!

--

Here Are 5 People Who Have Corroborated Details Of Tara Reade’s Accusation Against Joe Biden


Five different people have corroborated details of former Senate staffer Tara Reade’s sexual assault accusation against former Vice President Joe Biden.
Reade’s former neighbor Lynda LaCasse, her brother Collin Moulton and former coworker Lorraine Sanchez are among those who have corroborated details of her account.
Reade has accused Biden of pushing her against a wall, kissing her and penetrating her with his fingers without her consent.



More and more details of Tara Reade’s sexual assault accusation against former Vice President Joe Biden have been corroborated.

Reade, a former staffer for Biden while he was in the Senate, has accused the former vice president of pushing her up against a wall, kissing her, touching her and penetrating her with his fingers without her consent in 1993.

Biden has yet to personally address Reade’s accusation, though a campaign spokesperson has denied that the alleged incident ever happened. Biden’s campaign hasn’t returned repeated requests for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Five people have corroborated details of Reade’s account against Biden, who is the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, a Daily Caller News Foundation review of public statements found.

Reade’s mother

Reade’s late mother appeared to corroborate details of her account while calling into “Larry King Live” in 1993, shortly after Reade left Biden’s office. A transcript and video of the segment was uncovered after Reade mentioned in an interview that her mother had called into “Larry King Live” about her alleged assault.

“I’m wondering what a staffer would do besides go to the press in Washington? My daughter has just left there, after working for a prominent senator, and could not get through with her problems at all, and the only thing she could have done was go to the press, and she chose not to do it out of respect for him,” a woman from Reade’s hometown told King.

Reade confirmed to the DCNF that it was her mother’s voice on the call.

Reade’s brother

Reade’s brother, Collin Moulton, confirmed to The Intercept that she told him about the alleged assault around the time that it happened — long before she went public with her claims against Biden. Her brother also confirmed that Reade’s mother had encouraged her to contact the police about the alleged assault.

The former neighbor

Reade’s former neighbor, Lynda LaCasse, corroborated key details of Reade’s account in an interview published Monday.

“This happened, and I know it did because I remember talking about it,” LaCasse, a Biden supporter, told Business Insider.

“I remember her saying, here was this person that she was working for and she idolized him,” she added. “And he kind of put her up against a wall. And he put his hand up her skirt and he put his fingers inside her. She felt like she was assaulted, and she really didn’t feel there was anything she could do.”

LaCasse’s account of what Reade told her decades ago tracks with how Reade is describing the event now. Reade has accused Biden of pushing her against a up wall in a Senate corridor, kissing her, touching her and penetrating her with his fingers without her consent.

Reade’s close friend

One of Reade’s close friends, who remained anonymous, also confirmed to The Intercept that Reade had described the alleged assault around the time it was said to have happened. Ryan Grim, the reporter at The Intercept who spoke to Reade’s close friend, confirmed to the DCNF on Tuesday that the friend in the story is not LaCasse.

The former coworker

Reade’s former coworker, Lorraine Sanchez, also corroborated details of her account against Biden. Sanchez and Reade worked together at a California state senator’s office in the mid-1990s.

Reade told Sanchez that “she had been sexually harassed by her former boss while she was in D.C., and as a result of her voicing her concerns to her supervisors, she was let go, fired,” Sanchez told Business Insider. She recalled Biden was Reade’s former boss, but didn’t remember if Reade named Biden when describing the incident.

https://dailycaller.com/2020/04/28/tara-reade-joe-biden-accusation-corroboration-lynda-lacasse-collin-moulton-lorraine-sanchez/

[Kathianne]

Ahhh, the NYT says, 'Not so fast...'

I think we all tend to read some sites we trust, not always noticing the bias they may put onto those we don't tend to agree with.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-biden-camp-talking-points-inaccurately-describe-tara-reade-report


New York Times says Biden camp's talking points 'inaccurately' describe their Tara Reade reporting (https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times-biden-camp-talking-points-inaccurately-describe-tara-reade-report)

By Joseph A. Wulfsohn (https://www.foxnews.com/person/w/joseph-a-wulfsohn) | Fox News (http://www.foxnews.com/)

The New York Times rebuked the Biden campaign on Wednesday, telling Fox News that the reported talking points that have been circulated to prominent Democrats "inaccurately" describe the paper's reporting on the candidate's accuser Tara Reade.


"Buzzfeed reported on the existence of talking points being circulated by the Biden campaign that inaccurately suggest a New York Times investigation found that Tara Reade’s allegation 'did not happen.' Our investigation made no conclusion either way," a spokesperson for the Times said in a statement. "As Buzzfeed correctly reported, our story found three former Senate aides whom Reade said she complained to contemporaneously, all of whom either did not remember the incident or said that it did not happen."


The spokesperson continued, "The story also included former interns who remembered Reade suddenly changing roles and no longer overseeing them, which took place during the same time period that Reade said she was abruptly reassigned. The Times also spoke to a friend who said Reade told her the details of the allegation at the time; another friend and Reade’s brother say she told them of a traumatic sexual incident involving Biden."


On Tuesday, BuzzFeed News reported that despite strong denials the campaign has issued to various media outlets, aides for former Vice President Joe Biden are taking Reade "seriously enough behind the scenes to coordinate messaging among other Democrats to try to cast the matter as one that’s been thoroughly vetted and determined to be unfounded."
...

[pete311]

It's all disgusting, but when you have Trump as president, you surrender any arguments on this.

[Black Diamond]

It's all disgusting, but when you have Trump as president, you surrender any arguments on this.

No you don't. Not if your argument is the press is inconsistent

[jimnyc]

It's all disgusting, but when you have Trump as president, you surrender any arguments on this.

And they had investigations. As with Kavanaugh. It was aired and discussed by the lefty MSM non-stop, over and over - and I mean non-stop. AND they had pretty much nothing. Hence him in there now laughing at most liberal arguments and having the last say on issues.

And "even if" as they say, even if this entire board were to listen to your crap and claim we have nothing to say on this one - shouldn't YOU still do so? Shouldn't YOU have an interest in the truth at least? Doubtful, and likely the NY Times qualifies as being investigated to folks like you.

But we already know the answers. I am dead honest and 100% serious when I say I don't think I recall you EVER condemning a single person on the left, right in the face of proven facts. It matters not to you. NOT ONE. Meanwhile, in that same time, you have condemned somewhere around 10,000 different folks on the right. Different here though and I'll defend you even, as I do think you were correct on 3 or 4 of them over the years.

--

Bottom line - we know you won't be voting for him then. This is outright disgusting and you said so yourself. Short of a valid investigation that exonerates him, that stays the same. And I know you're an honorable kinda guy and would NEVER do something that you accuse others of.

And regardless of what others feel, we at least now know that you 2 will be demanding an investigation and holding him accountable. Gotta be a man of your word, right? A man that sees shenanigans and disgusting acts by someone, and then holds them accountable for such, to a minimum of a very thorough investigation, and by congress if an incoming president or SC justice. About time you admit something that Biden did that disqualifies him. And I know you ain't the type to ignore that, just because of what the folks on a message board think. Surely you have more integrity than that, and you would at least tell us to fuck off as you question all of this and make a true decision. Looks like you may be reaching manhood finally, Pete!! Congrats!!

I will be anxiously awaiting your investigation and questions and condemnations on this one.