Livin-in-sin Boyfriend arrested for sexually-assulting, then HANGING little girl

[darin]

From the files of: "If this man is guilty, he needs to be put-down"



http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296674,00.html

CORSICANA, Texas — Authorities named the live-in boyfriend of the mother of a 6-year-old girl found hanged and sexually assaulted as the primary suspect on Thursday.

Kevin Wayne Anders was arrested late Wednesday on charges of unlawful possession of child pornography after an analysis of computer files revealed pornography, said Chief Deputy Mike Cox of the Navarro County Sheriff's Office. Anders is being held on a $100,000 bond.

Hanna Mack was discovered Monday by her mother, Dana, hanging in the garage with a rope around her neck in Navarro Mills Lake, about 65 miles south of Dallas, and there were signs that she had been sexually abused, police said.

"I just touched her arm and I wanted to get her down so bad," Dana Mack told MyFOXDFW.com.


"I will confirm that the hanging and sexual assault were part of this scenario," Navarro County Sheriff's Chief Deputy Mike Cox said.

Cox said several people had been interviewed and no one has been ruled out as a suspect.

"We don't want to do anything that would compromise a successful prosecution of this case," Cox said Wednesday before abruptly ending a brief news conference.

In a letter to the sheriff's department, Navarro County Judge Vicki Gray said an autopsy of the body showed "a multitude of events that together caused the death of this child."

The first-grader's body was found in a garage behind her home early Monday.

"I'm just concerned about the kids out there," said Harold Hocutt, 75, a neighbor who knows the girl's family. "Little girls. Little boys. It's just something you don't forget. Every time I drive by [Hannah's house], I cry."

Police asked state caseworkers not to say whether Hanna's family had been investigated by child welfare officers, said Marissa Gonzales, a spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services.

"I wish I could punish this person myself," Dana Mack told MyFOXDFW.com.

[avatar4321]

Justice would demand that he be hung after being sexually assaulted. So send him to prison and after he is raped, hang him.

This just further supports my thoughts that we need to stop pornography from infecting the men of this nation at all costs. That trash warps the mind, especially when it involves kids. How many more lives are going to have to be lost before we fight back?

[truthmatters]

A lifetime in prison living in fear fo his fellow inmates would be fine with me.

[darin]

Why not just kill him?

[theHawk]

Pedophiles need to get the death penalty. There is no curing them and they have no right to get free room and board the rest of their lives.

[diuretic]

"We don't want to do anything that would compromise a successful prosecution of this case," Cox said Wednesday before abruptly ending a brief news conference.

Good for him, cut that speculation out straight away.

[truthmatters]

When you give an automatic death sentance to a molester you give them no reason to leave the child alive.

[darin]

That sounds good, TM - but it's crap. Not all child molesters are killers. There's just no logic in your statement.

[diuretic]

That sounds good, TM - but it's crap. Not all child molesters are killers. There's just no logic in your statement.

TM is right though.

If the witness is dead they can't attend a line-up (identification parade) and pick out the offender. If they previously knew the offender they're not required (in my jurisdiction) to do so, they can just nominate the offender "Uncle Dan did it."

But if the victim is dead they can't do either of those things.

If the sentence for molesting a child is the same as for murdering a child then the molester may as well kill the child. They won't get a different penalty and if they kill the child they may get away with the original offence because there's no victim to testify.

[KarlMarx]

A child is 20 times more likely to be molested, abused, assaulted or killed by its mother's boyfriend than by its father.... family court judges should take notice....

[diuretic]

A child is 20 times more likely to be molested, abused, assaulted or killed by its mother's boyfriend than by its father.... family court judges should take notice....

I would have thought that separated/divorced women with a child would want to take note of that. And I'm sure they would be very interested.

[darin]

TM is right though.

If the witness is dead they can't attend a line-up (identification parade) and pick out the offender. If they previously knew the offender they're not required (in my jurisdiction) to do so, they can just nominate the offender "Uncle Dan did it."

But if the victim is dead they can't do either of those things.

If the sentence for molesting a child is the same as for murdering a child then the molester may as well kill the child. They won't get a different penalty and if they kill the child they may get away with the original offence because there's no victim to testify.

DNA points people out. Eyewitness testimony is horribly un-reliable.

[diuretic]

DNA points people out. Eyewitness testimony is horribly un-reliable.

You missed the point.

If it's the same penalty for molesting a child as it is for killing a child then this is what happens:

Situation A: We don't execute child molesters:

1. A molests a child (let's call the child B).
2. Now this child is not an "eyewitness" in any incidental form, this child is a victim and has probably had a fair time to take note of the identity of the offender.
3. The child points out the suspect (we'll call the suspect C)
4. The defendant is found guilty.

Situation B. Now we execute child molesters.

1. A molests a child. A has previously been convicted and know how the system operates.
2. A thinks, this kid can give evidence against me. But if I molest this kid and/or I kill this kid the penalty is the same if I get caught.
3. If I kill the kid I may get away with the molestation and the murder.
4. Since it's the same penalty I may as well kill the kid.

[dan]

Pedophiles need to get the death penalty. There is no curing them and they have no right to get free room and board the rest of their lives.

Absolutely.

[dan]

TM is right though.

If the witness is dead they can't attend a line-up (identification parade) and pick out the offender. If they previously knew the offender they're not required (in my jurisdiction) to do so, they can just nominate the offender "Uncle Dan did it."

But if the victim is dead they can't do either of those things.

If the sentence for molesting a child is the same as for murdering a child then the molester may as well kill the child. They won't get a different penalty and if they kill the child they may get away with the original offence because there's no victim to testify.

Why is that the first name you go to??? :bang3: :laugh2:

[hjmick]

A lifetime in prison living in fear fo his fellow inmates would be fine with me.

He would be lucky to last six months. Prison justice is swift and brutal. Funny that you find sentencing him to death distasteful, but you are more than willing to throw into the arena with the lions. It's okay for his fellow inmates to kill him, but you take issue with a fair trial, evidence, a verdict from a jury, and sentencing by a judge.

[Dilloduck]

You missed the point.

If it's the same penalty for molesting a child as it is for killing a child then this is what happens:

Situation A: We don't execute child molesters:

1. A molests a child (let's call the child B).
2. Now this child is not an "eyewitness" in any incidental form, this child is a victim and has probably had a fair time to take note of the identity of the offender.
3. The child points out the suspect (we'll call the suspect C)
4. The defendant is found guilty.

Situation B. Now we execute child molesters.

1. A molests a child. A has previously been convicted and know how the system operates.
2. A thinks, this kid can give evidence against me. But if I molest this kid and/or I kill this kid the penalty is the same if I get caught.
3. If I kill the kid I may get away with the molestation and the murder.
4. Since it's the same penalty I may as well kill the kid.

You are attributing a lot of logic, control and common sense to criminals who have none---their minds are pathologically screwed. If they were so concerned about the consequences of their behavior, they wouldn't commit the crime in the first place.

[theHawk]

When you give an automatic death sentance to a molester you give them no reason to leave the child alive.

Automatic death sentences for murders drives murder rates down in states that have the death penalty.

Do you want to drive down the number of child molestations or not?

The point is to PREVENT further child molestations from happening, not what incentives we can give pedophiles.

[Gunny]

A lifetime in prison living in fear fo his fellow inmates would be fine with me.

Forget that shit. Drag his out back, drop him on his knees and entertain his begging, crying and pleading for his life for awhile before putting one through his head.

Human garbage like this does not deserve to use up any more resources than he already has.

[Gunny]

When you give an automatic death sentance to a molester you give them no reason to leave the child alive.

He didn't. This one was hanging in the garage for her mother to find.

[avatar4321]

When you give an automatic death sentance to a molester you give them no reason to leave the child alive.

Not following the logic here. Im trying but it really makes no sense.

I mean if you were someone considering molesting a child and knew that there was an automatic death sentence if you got caught would you:

1)Kill the kid too or
2)not do the molesting?

i highly doubt the molesters are thinking right now that the only reason they dont kill the kids is because they wont get the death penalty now.

[Abbey Marie]

I am all for Gunny's version of justice.

And let's not forget dear old mom, who let this deranged child porn collecting maniac live in the same house with her 6 year old. She had to know he was some sort of freak.

[darin]

I understand the libs here - I get it...see...Libs 'tend' to think we're all vitims of our sexual desires and preferences, and it's just plain TOO MUCH to ask a sexual pervert to fix themselves.

[avatar4321]

I understand the libs here - I get it...see...Libs 'tend' to think we're all vitims of our sexual desires and preferences, and it's just plain TOO MUCH to ask a sexual pervert to fix themselves.

It would contradict their viewpoint that people cant help themselves sexually. Choice and accountability are foreign to them.

[Gunny]

I am all for Gunny's version of justice.

And let's not forget dear old mom, who let this deranged child porn collecting maniac live in the same house with her 6 year old. She had to know he was some sort of freak.

If she's guilty of that, I hope she lives a LONG time remembering each morning what she found in the garage. Justice enough.

[Kathianne]

I feel for the family. However, what are mothers thinking that take in 'live ins?' Haven't they read story after story of abuse of children, especially girls?

I read them, when I was married. When divorce came, I made up my mind that not only would there be no 'live ins' there would be 'visitors.' I didn't let my 'friends' meet my children, until we had been dating at least a year. That meant my kids met one guy. That was shortly before my parents came to visit and couldn't leave, that relationship went kaput and I can't say I'm sorry.

Why would a parent take this kind of chance?

[Abbey Marie]

I feel for the family. However, what are mothers thinking that take in 'live ins?' Haven't they read story after story of abuse of children, especially girls?

I read them, when I was married. When divorce came, I made up my mind that not only would there be no 'live ins' there would be 'visitors.' I didn't let my 'friends' meet my children, until we had been dating at least a year. That meant my kids met one guy. That was shortly before my parents came to visit and couldn't leave, that relationship went kaput and I can't say I'm sorry.

Why would a parent take this kind of chance?

My guess is plain old selfishness. "I want it so I'm going to have it." "Whatever makes me happy is all that matters." Etc.

[Gunny]

I feel for the family. However, what are mothers thinking that take in 'live ins?' Haven't they read story after story of abuse of children, especially girls?

I read them, when I was married. When divorce came, I made up my mind that not only would there be no 'live ins' there would be 'visitors.' I didn't let my 'friends' meet my children, until we had been dating at least a year. That meant my kids met one guy. That was shortly before my parents came to visit and couldn't leave, that relationship went kaput and I can't say I'm sorry.

Why would a parent take this kind of chance?

Y'know, that door actually swings both ways. When I was a single, divorced parent, I sure as Hell didn't bring any dates around my house. Matter of fact, I only really went out when daughter was at X's.