Alik Bahshi
10-30-2020, 12:53 PM
Alik Bakhshi
On the question of Democracy
In 1887, history professor Alexander Tyler, in his work "Democracy is always a temporary phenomenon in nature," suggested that after 200 years of democracy as a form of government will become obsolete.
Referring to this prediction, Professor Joseph Olson said:
"If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal aliens - and they vote - then we can say goodbye, USA, in less than five years."
That is, for the United States, this may happen even much earlier.
In part, Olson's reasoning is correct. But the fact is that the United States as a democratic country was created by Europeans and mainly Anglo-Saxons, and for themselves, and not for blacks, Mexicans and others, who, for many reasons and mainly the people's mentality, still cannot exist normally in conditions democracy. They can only use its benefits, internally not perceiving the rules of functioning created by others in a democratic society. And, naturally, if the Mexicans turn out to be more of a kind of "critical mass", then the United States will become Mexico. It all depends on people who differ ethnically, and as long as this difference persists, inequality in Humanity will also persist. Excessive tolerance will destroy, for example, the EU.
By the way, tolerance applies not only to immigrants from the Middle East, but also to immigrants from Russia. It all depends on the number of foreigners, that is, on the critical mass of people with a different mentality, which is hereditary.
True, among European peoples, there is a difference in mentality, for example, Great Britain and France were empires, and when the British left India, they left everything, and the French, leaving Africa, even took away telegraph poles, and today the Indians and the British are friends.
See the article "The fate of the people, or each cricket has its own six" https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=100#post-alikbahshi-28564
Maybe I'm wrong, but somehow it is necessary to explain why the Finns live better than the Russians. I think it is not difficult to imagine what will become of prosperous Finland if Russians immigrate to Finland in numbers exceeding the "critical mass".
In summary, we can say that Democracy is a good thing, but not all peoples are able to equally enjoy its benefits. Putin understands this, therefore he called the state system of Russia sovereign democracy, that is, democracy for the sovereign, in other words - a monarchy, or socialism of the Russian flood.
09/24/2020
On the question of Democracy
In 1887, history professor Alexander Tyler, in his work "Democracy is always a temporary phenomenon in nature," suggested that after 200 years of democracy as a form of government will become obsolete.
Referring to this prediction, Professor Joseph Olson said:
"If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal aliens - and they vote - then we can say goodbye, USA, in less than five years."
That is, for the United States, this may happen even much earlier.
In part, Olson's reasoning is correct. But the fact is that the United States as a democratic country was created by Europeans and mainly Anglo-Saxons, and for themselves, and not for blacks, Mexicans and others, who, for many reasons and mainly the people's mentality, still cannot exist normally in conditions democracy. They can only use its benefits, internally not perceiving the rules of functioning created by others in a democratic society. And, naturally, if the Mexicans turn out to be more of a kind of "critical mass", then the United States will become Mexico. It all depends on people who differ ethnically, and as long as this difference persists, inequality in Humanity will also persist. Excessive tolerance will destroy, for example, the EU.
By the way, tolerance applies not only to immigrants from the Middle East, but also to immigrants from Russia. It all depends on the number of foreigners, that is, on the critical mass of people with a different mentality, which is hereditary.
True, among European peoples, there is a difference in mentality, for example, Great Britain and France were empires, and when the British left India, they left everything, and the French, leaving Africa, even took away telegraph poles, and today the Indians and the British are friends.
See the article "The fate of the people, or each cricket has its own six" https://alikbahshi.livejournal.com/?skip=100#post-alikbahshi-28564
Maybe I'm wrong, but somehow it is necessary to explain why the Finns live better than the Russians. I think it is not difficult to imagine what will become of prosperous Finland if Russians immigrate to Finland in numbers exceeding the "critical mass".
In summary, we can say that Democracy is a good thing, but not all peoples are able to equally enjoy its benefits. Putin understands this, therefore he called the state system of Russia sovereign democracy, that is, democracy for the sovereign, in other words - a monarchy, or socialism of the Russian flood.
09/24/2020