Tokyo Medical Association press conference recommends Ivermectin for Covid

[Juicer66]

https://youtu.be/xkWOpFk1GGk time under one and half minutes .


Presently Fake News MSM are claiming only that a batch of Moderna is contaminated . But the truth will likely be very different .

We await confirmation but we are told that the truth is that the Moderna inoculation induces magnetism in many patients .

Something first reported by the Spanish research group , La Quinta Columna , and since supported elsewhere by other research groups .As reported here several times .

MSM silence . But the Hoax is crumbling into the dust it really is .

[revelarts]

Ivermectin Evidence with Dr Tess Lawrie

Talks about her ongoing research into the various studies on Ivermectin.
Bottom line, using increasingly tighter and tighter outlines, they've found 65% fewer deaths with Ivermectin.
Studies are ongoing

ALSO seems to be effective in OTHER Viral infections.


https://youtu.be/vYF8bnmdQfY


Links below may be broken they are all at the youtube page.

Ivermectin reduces the risk of death from COVID-19 -a rapid review and meta-analysis in support of the recommendation of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.

https://www.researchgate.net/publicat...​

Kory P, Meduri GU, Iglesias J, et al. Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. 18 Dec 2020.
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-co...​

World Health Organization. 21st Model List of Essential Medicines. Geneva, Switzerland. 2019.
https://www.who.int/publications/i/it...​

Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.0 Cochrane, 2019.
www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook).

The GRADE Working Group. GRADE [website] 2020
www.gradeworkinggroup.org (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org).

Alam MT, Murshed R, Gomes PF, Masud ZM, Saber S, Chaklader MA, Khanam F, Hossain M, Momen ABIM, Yasmin N, Alam RF, Sultana A, Robin RC. Ivermectin as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for COVID-19 among Healthcare Providers in a Selected Tertiary Hospital in Dhaka – An Observational Study
https://ejmed.org/index.php/ejmed/art...​

Elgazzar A, Eltaweel A, Youssef SA, Hany B, Hafez M and Moussa H. Efficacy and Safety of ivermectin for Treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 Pandemic. Res. Square [Internet] 28Dec.2020
https://www.researchsquare.com/articl...​

Chowdhury, ATMM, Shahbaz, M, Karim, MR, Islam, J, Guo, D, and He, SA Randomized Trial of Ivermectin-Doxycycline and Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin therapy on COVID19 patients.
https://www.researchsquare.com/articl...​

Podder CS, Chowdhury N, Mohim IS and Haque W. (2020). Outcome of ivermectin treated mild to moderate COVID-19 cases: a single-centre, open-label, randomised controlled study. IMC Journal of Medical Science.

Niaee MS, Gheibi N, Namdar P, Allami A, Zolghadr L, Javadi A, et al. Ivermectin as an adjunct treatment for hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients: A randomized multi-centre clinical trial. Res. Square [Internet] 24Nov.2020
https://www.researchsquare.com/articl...​

Hashim HA, Maulood MF, Rasheed AM, Fatak DF, Kabah KK, Abdulami AS, et al. Controlled randomized clinical trial on using Ivermectin with Doxycycline for treating COVID-19 patients in Baghdad, Iraq. medRxiv [Internet] 2020.10.26.20219345
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.20...​

Ahmed S, Karim MM, Ross AG, Hossain MS, Clemens JD, Sumiya MK, et al. A five day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness. Int. J. Infect. Disease [Internet] 2Dec.2020.
https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1...​

Chachar AZK, Khan KA, Asif M, Tanveer K, Khaqan A and Basri R. Effectiveness of Ivermectin in SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Patients, Int. J. Sciences [Internet] Nov.2020:31-V1.2 6th January 2021 20 35
https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/articl...​

Cepelowicz Rajter J, Sherman MS, Fatteh N, Vogel F, Sacks J and Rajter JJ. Use of Ivermectin Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019. J. Chest [Internet] 27Oct.2020.
https://journal.chestnet.org/action/s...​

Khan SI, Khan SI, Debnath CR, Nath PN, Al Mahtab M, Nabeka H, et al. [Ivermectin Treatment May Improve the Prognosis of Patients With COVID-19.] Archivos de Bronconeumología, 2020. Volume 56, Issue 12, Pages 828-830,ISSN 0300- 2896.Spain.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2020...​.

Gorial FI, Mashhadani S, Sayaly HM, Dakhil BD, AlMashhadani MM, Aljabory AM, et al. Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial).MedRxiv. 2020.07.07.20145979;
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.07.20...​

Spoorthi V, Sasank S. Utility of ivermectin and doxycycline combination for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. International Archives of Integrated Medicine.
https://www.iaimjournal.com/volume-7-...​ october-2020/

“I can’t keep doing this.” Doctor pleads for review of data during COVID-19 Senate hearing. 8 December 2020.

[revelarts]

over the past several months i've looked at this ive been to a lot of research sites and have personally saved the info to my hardrives.
MANY of the links i have are now "404 errors" and youtube censored because of "guidelines".
the censorship is strait up crazy.

But i'll post a few that are left

Beyond The Roundup | Italian-led Ivermectin Meta-Analysis: Consider For Help Treating COVID-19?
Italian-led Ivermectin Meta-Analysis: Is it Time to Consider the Generic Low Cost Option to Help Treat COVID-19?

A group of six critical care physicians and researchers, four of who are affiliated with IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute in Milan, Italy, recently conducted a meta-analysis looking into ivermectin and along the way asking a highly uncomfortable question as to whether suspect claims about safety for commonly available drugs in fact are driven by a deep-seated, intensive fear of failure among the scientific and medical community. After all, tens of billions have been invested into a particular approach and anything that gets in the way could be deemed recognition of failure. In probing the ivermectin situation, the group, including four Italians, a Russian and Spanish doctors and researcher identified over 45 clinical trials ongoing involving ivermectin investigations. In performing yet another ivermectin meta-analysis covering a total of 1323 patients randomized across seven randomized controlled trials conducted in six countries, the group identified that in fact ivermectin treatment led to a statistically significant lower mortality rate when compared to placebo. The authors argue that while in fact “ironclad evidence” represents a fundamental underpinning of modern medicine, in emergency situations the use of an economical medication with a well-known safety profile, including absence of major side effects within dosage ranges, could be considered in fact quite rational. Despite the “urge” to demand large high quality randomized controlled trials, the authors declare that the existing ivermectin studies “point in the same direction” and this simply cannot be ignored. After all, the vaccines are still experimental, meaning they are authorized under emergency use authorization exactly due to conditions associated with pandemic times. Perhaps the authors imply, the same logic could be applied to ivermectin.

..The authors shared a few of the studies, including the Bangladesh study led by Ahmed S where treating mild cases of SARS-CoV-2, the study used a dose of ivermectin of 12 mg for 5 days. The results were published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

They also covered the Egyptian study led by Elgazzar A et al covering mild to severe COVID-19, using a dose of 400 mcg/kg (max 24 mg) for 4 days—the results are still in preprint. Yet another study led by Hashim HA in Iraq treated mild to severe cases with 200 mcg/kg for 2 to 3 days and available via the preprint server. Other studies included Niaee, MS et al from Iran, Okumus in Turkey, Ravikirti in India and another study out of Bangladesh authored by Mahmud R.
..
https://trialsitenews.com/italian-led-ivermectin-meta-analysis-is-it-time-to-consider-the-generic-low-cost-option-to-help-treat-covid-19/

[revelarts]

Studies and info

Among other studies this Doctor mentions the data the Japanese Doc is talking about.
the FACT the there was LESS incidence of Covid in African areas where Ivermectin had been given out regularly as an antiviral.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u21N8Vu4kOk&t=1s

Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-Ivermectin-in-the-prophylaxis-and-treatment-of-COVID-19.pdf

The Latest Results of Ivermectin’s Success in Treating Outbreaks of COVID-19
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/epidemiologic-analyses-on-covid19-and-ivermectin/

A COVID-19 prophylaxis? Lower incidence associated with prophylactic administration of ivermectin
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7698683/#bib0019

Benefit of ivermectin: from scabies to COVID-19, an example of serendipity
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S015196382030627X

Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical Ivermectin + Iota- Carrageenan in the Prophylaxis against COVID-19 in Health Personnel
https://media.marinomed.com/8b/7a/c7/nota-journal-of-biomedical-research-safety-adn-efficacy-iota-carrageenan-and-ivermectin.pdf


The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129059/

[revelarts]

https://youtu.be/zfqxCkJw0Rk

Vaccine "Emergency Use Authorization" & ivermectin (from Livestream #80)

2 scientist discuss Ivermectin info available and they explore several issues
The evidence looks good.
Seems as good as vaccines.
why hasn't the FDA tested it?
Why did MERCK say it's not safe or effective?
why does the WHO and the Media simply parrot MERCK's statements?
watch before youtube removes it.


From youtube transcript

... we have to talk about the predicament that we are in on youtube with respect to ivermectin which is mentioned specifically in uh their community guidelines youtube has community guidelines.

you really want to start before you even say what the thing is.

yeah i do because um we are scientists who are about to talk about scientific evidence that scientific evidence may have implications for what we collectively ought to be doing and what you individually might think we are not going to make any recommendations as to what you should do and we are not going to say anything conclusive about what the data say because the data are not themselves conclusive however it doesn't mean the data don't imply thingsand you know i think youtube ought to think very carefully about whether it wants to confront two people who have the proper credentials have demonstrated a willingness to be responsible about evaluating heterodox scientific processes and in this case are have just been through a circumstance where a hypothesis that they were suggesting needed to be investigated is now understood to be necessary to be investigated uh you know in science etc so that's the context.
the question is, given all of the evidence, circumstantial, inadvertent, experimental as it may be, from all of the evidence, that this appears to have a mechanism for action and appears efficacious in preventing both the spread between people and the spread within a person. SO why on earth would you (FDA) not run a very large study that would tell you for sure how good this was and how best to use it.

Yeah why wouldn't you why wouldn't you ?

And uh wouldn't it.. wouldn't it be a legitimate word to use that it would be criminal if you didn't if you knew that it would be a good idea to do so?

Well as it turns out if ivermectin were an effective treatment the vaccines never would have gotten emergency use authorization in the u.s ..And um we know that because even though even my computer would like me not to be talking about this here is and we'll link... we'll link... to uh.. the url for this... but here... uh... here is just a downloaded version of the document from the FDA emergency use authorization of medical products and related authorities guidance for industry in our state and other stakeholders. So i'm going to scroll down this is from January 2017 expires in 2022
this is still the um the guiding document and you go down not very far although it may seem like it's going fairly far and find emergency use authorizations... here we go
"...Criteria for issuance under emergency use authorization medical products
1 criteria for issuance there are a few it needs to be a serious or life-threatening disease or condition there needs to be evidence of effectiveness there needs to be a risk benefit analysis and there needs to be no alternatives..."
i quote
"For the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization there must be no adequate approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing preventing or treating the disease or condition a potential alternative product may be considered unavailable. if there are insufficient supplies of the approved alternative to fully meet the emergency need...."

That is not a problem for ivermectin. By not doing the relevant large-scale clinical studies on ivermectin and thus it not being approved by the FDA for use in Covid that opens the door for euas for emergency use authorization for the vaccines that we are now all living with.

And among this is stunning, if that is the explanation then we are talking about something for which i'm not even sure we have a proper term because...

angry inducing?

uh it is that, but let's just say um this would have elements of malpractice
this would be gross negligence.
i think it verges on depraved indifference
given that we're talking about a life or death situation for vulnerable people who get this disease in addition to effectively the crippling of the world economy and who knows how much harm we'll never be able to measure.

... if this is effective if, this is effective and you know we can't say that it is but we can say, look evidence works a certain way, this certainly seems like a whole lot of evidence that points in a direction, and if it were just simply good at treating people with covid that would be immense the fact that it appears comparable in preventing people from contracting the disease to at a prophylactic dose at a prophylactic dose to vaccines.
That we happen to have a long-standing administration of this thing to people and in parts of the world where there are things like river blindness people do take this regularly in fact i think is referred to as sunday sunday because people remember to take it uh on a as a weekly or bi-weekly basis.
The point is we have a lot of information on how people tolerate this drug . So if it was a great drug for this that would be immensely good news for planet earth. What's more this stuff is readily makable right you can make this stuff all over the world and in fact it is too readily makable probably too readily makable now what do you mean by that well it's been around for a very long time.
and it's no longer under patent
no longer under patent so anybody can make it and not violate
uh and yet and yet check out i mean you actually sent me this
so you know this but check out mark's response

uh so MERCK does MERCK does not like ivermectin at all. i want to point out the the history here so uh satoshi is in here okay omura discovers this compound he sends it to william campbell who i think is a friend of his who is a merc scientist right ivermectin is the drug that emerges it gets a nobel prize right so those two or yeah those two those well those two got a nobel prize for their discovery of that drug and they shared that nobel prize with a woman who was being heralded for discoveries05 in fighting malaria i believe but in any case a nobel prize was awarded for the discovery of the compound that became ivermectin which is a merck drug okay what does mark say mark says um here actually maybe let's see if i can show the relevant here we go okay so this um this is a quote from an article that i will link to merck's patent on ivermectin expired in 1996 and they produced less than five percent of global supply in 2020 they were asked to assist in nigerian and japanese trials but declined both in 2021 mark released a statement claiming that ivermectin was not an effective treatment against covid-19 and bizarrely claimed quote a concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies of a drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts by primary care workers in mass campaigns to millions developing countries of a drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts by primary care workers in mass campaigns to millions developing countries.
The media reported the MERCK statement as a blinding truth without looking at the conflict of interest when days later MERCK received 356 million dollars from the us government to develop an investigational therapeutic the who even quoted MERCK as evidence that it didn't work in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin it's a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy global vaccine rollout to everyone is the policy so is there a polite way of saying what the is going on right yeah like we're talking about a situation...

[revelarts]

Ivermectin in Peru Review
"Further analysis of results from Peru has now shown that systematic treatment of the population for covid-19 with ivermectin resulted in a 14-fold reduction in excess deaths. IMI interviewed Dr David Scheim, an independent medical researcher based in Blacksburg, Virginia to find out more."
You can read the full study here
https://osf.io/9egh4/

there was a youtube video explainer but it's been deleted.

[revelarts]

Peer reviewed meta analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics

Bottom line finding,
Probably reduces deaths by 62%
and
possible reduces transmission by 86%

Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines
....
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/08000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.7.aspx

https://youtu.be/3j7am9kjMrk

[SassyLady]

THANK YOU, REV!

I've read a lot of these studies about Ivermectin but the links disappeared before I realized they were being censored so had nothing to bring here. As I mentioned in another thread, my doctor said the FDA is cracking down on anything other than vaccine to treat COVID. The Pharmacies are calling her and asking why she's prescribing ivermectin and she can't say for covid or they won't fill it. She has to say it's for parasites. All the Walgreens in this area are completely out.

[SassyLady]

Here it comes ..

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/26/us/covid-ivermectin-arkansas-doctor/index.html

[Mr. P]

Good info revelarts ! :2up:

[Juicer66]

Much fine concentrated effort Revelarts .

I often think of the deaths caused by the '2020 Nazis' who ridiculed those advocating daily Vitamins C , D3 plus Zinc etc as simple ways to prevent infection in the first

place . And Ivermectin and HCQ used early after infection .

Anything up to a million needlessly dead .

[revelarts]

Here it comes ..

https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/26/us/covid-ivermectin-arkansas-doctor/index.html

CNN is worse than Pravda on serious issues.
The sad thing is, I think folks at CNN drink their own kool-aid.

Notice how they set that up, with the lovely host, calling Ivermectin a treatment for horses and cow. Instead of acknowledging that it's been used over a billion times by people for over 40 years and helped millions of people with parasites and the like.
The SG never corrects her or explains the misrepresentation. He just starts beating Social Media over the head because they aren't censoring enough.

We're living in interesting times man.