BoogyMan
04-26-2022, 05:04 PM
The argument is "that was long ago." The woman is a pig and needs to be in jail. She is a cancer on our politics.
https://thegreggjarrett.com/hillary-clintons-lawyers-try-to-get-trumps-russiagate-lawsuit-tossed-that-was-long-ago/
Clinton’s lawyers claim (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hillary-clinton-moves-to-dismiss-trumps-russiagate-lawsuit-against-her?utm_campaign=article_rail&utm_source=internal&utm_medium=article_rail) the lawsuit has no merit: “Whatever the utility of Plaintiff’s Complaint as a fundraising tool, a press release, or a list of political grievances, it has no merit as a lawsuit, and should be dismissed with prejudice,” the filing says (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21677353-trumpvclintonmtd042022).
One of the lawyers’ biggest arguments is that it happened a long time ago. “By the complaint’s own telling, these alleged events occurred long ago, and Plaintiff has been aware of his purported injuries for years.”
Clinton’s lawyers maintain that “the statute of limitations on his claims expired long ago” and that the First Amendment protects her campaign’s activities during the election. “At most, Plaintiff alleges that other entities sought to further Clinton’s candidacy and, after the election, politically opposed Plaintiff’s administration,” the motion argues....
https://thegreggjarrett.com/hillary-clintons-lawyers-try-to-get-trumps-russiagate-lawsuit-tossed-that-was-long-ago/
Clinton’s lawyers claim (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/hillary-clinton-moves-to-dismiss-trumps-russiagate-lawsuit-against-her?utm_campaign=article_rail&utm_source=internal&utm_medium=article_rail) the lawsuit has no merit: “Whatever the utility of Plaintiff’s Complaint as a fundraising tool, a press release, or a list of political grievances, it has no merit as a lawsuit, and should be dismissed with prejudice,” the filing says (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21677353-trumpvclintonmtd042022).
One of the lawyers’ biggest arguments is that it happened a long time ago. “By the complaint’s own telling, these alleged events occurred long ago, and Plaintiff has been aware of his purported injuries for years.”
Clinton’s lawyers maintain that “the statute of limitations on his claims expired long ago” and that the First Amendment protects her campaign’s activities during the election. “At most, Plaintiff alleges that other entities sought to further Clinton’s candidacy and, after the election, politically opposed Plaintiff’s administration,” the motion argues....