jimnyc
05-11-2022, 01:48 PM
revelarts
Also according to the left,
harassing Supreme Court justices at their homes makes you a “Good American”
but showing up to school board meetings makes you a “terrorist”.
that needs to go on a homeland security watch list & be investigated.
Got it?
Exactly. Spot on. Nailed it.
And now we live in an age where it is somehow OK to appear at the doorstep of supreme court justices. Which is a federal crime as noted. And not only that - but "encouraged" by the White House itself. Encouraging a federal crime!
And not only encouraging a federal crime, but also one to the highest court in our country. And why? Simply because once again they disagree with something.
---
Jen Psaki Says White House Encourages ‘Peaceful’ Protests Outside Justices’ Homes
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.
As Breitbart News reported Saturday, mobs of pro-abortion protesters gathered outside the homes of Supreme Court justices after the leak of a draft majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that would reverse Roe v. Wade (1973). Though the protests have been peaceful, they are virtually unprecedented as a way to pressure the highest court — both directly and personally.
https://i.imgur.com/NRTfuxs.png
Title 18 of the U.S. Code, section 1507 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507), makes protests outside the private residence of a federal judge a federal crime:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
On Friday, Psaki was asked about impending protests but declined to condemn or criticize them. On Monday, she issued a tweet denouncing violence, but did not specifically mention the protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices.
https://i.imgur.com/mD2NPuZ.png
On Tuesday, during her daily White House briefing, Psaki was asked whether the president felt that “the demonstrations outside of, say, Justice Alito’s home — are those attempts to interfere or intimidate?” The reporter noted that the Department of Justice had responded quickly and harshly to protests outside the homes of school board members in recent months.
Psaki evaded the question, accusing critics of hypocrisy (emphasis added):
I think I said yesterday, but I’m happy to repeat, because I think it’s important for everybody to hear, that the president long-standing view has been that violence, threats, and intimidation of any kind have no place in political discourse. And we believe, of course, in peaceful protest. What I do find is interesting, and I think many people have noted, is that there are voices on the right who have called out this protests that are happening while remaining silent for years on protests that have happened outside the homes of school board members, the Michigan Secretary of State, or including threats made to women seeking reproductive health care [sic], or even an insurrection [sic] against our capitol. So I know that there’s an outrage right now, I guess, about protests that have been peaceful to date, and we certainly continue to encourage that outside of judges’ homes, and that’s the president’s position, but the silence is pretty deafening about all of the other intimidation that we’ve seen to a number of people.
Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/10/watch-jen-psaki-says-white-house-encourages-peaceful-protests-outside-justices-homes/
Also according to the left,
harassing Supreme Court justices at their homes makes you a “Good American”
but showing up to school board meetings makes you a “terrorist”.
that needs to go on a homeland security watch list & be investigated.
Got it?
Exactly. Spot on. Nailed it.
And now we live in an age where it is somehow OK to appear at the doorstep of supreme court justices. Which is a federal crime as noted. And not only that - but "encouraged" by the White House itself. Encouraging a federal crime!
And not only encouraging a federal crime, but also one to the highest court in our country. And why? Simply because once again they disagree with something.
---
Jen Psaki Says White House Encourages ‘Peaceful’ Protests Outside Justices’ Homes
White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.
As Breitbart News reported Saturday, mobs of pro-abortion protesters gathered outside the homes of Supreme Court justices after the leak of a draft majority opinion by Justice Samuel Alito that would reverse Roe v. Wade (1973). Though the protests have been peaceful, they are virtually unprecedented as a way to pressure the highest court — both directly and personally.
https://i.imgur.com/NRTfuxs.png
Title 18 of the U.S. Code, section 1507 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1507), makes protests outside the private residence of a federal judge a federal crime:
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
On Friday, Psaki was asked about impending protests but declined to condemn or criticize them. On Monday, she issued a tweet denouncing violence, but did not specifically mention the protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices.
https://i.imgur.com/mD2NPuZ.png
On Tuesday, during her daily White House briefing, Psaki was asked whether the president felt that “the demonstrations outside of, say, Justice Alito’s home — are those attempts to interfere or intimidate?” The reporter noted that the Department of Justice had responded quickly and harshly to protests outside the homes of school board members in recent months.
Psaki evaded the question, accusing critics of hypocrisy (emphasis added):
I think I said yesterday, but I’m happy to repeat, because I think it’s important for everybody to hear, that the president long-standing view has been that violence, threats, and intimidation of any kind have no place in political discourse. And we believe, of course, in peaceful protest. What I do find is interesting, and I think many people have noted, is that there are voices on the right who have called out this protests that are happening while remaining silent for years on protests that have happened outside the homes of school board members, the Michigan Secretary of State, or including threats made to women seeking reproductive health care [sic], or even an insurrection [sic] against our capitol. So I know that there’s an outrage right now, I guess, about protests that have been peaceful to date, and we certainly continue to encourage that outside of judges’ homes, and that’s the president’s position, but the silence is pretty deafening about all of the other intimidation that we’ve seen to a number of people.
Rest - https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/05/10/watch-jen-psaki-says-white-house-encourages-peaceful-protests-outside-justices-homes/