Evangelicals unhappy with GOP choices

[gabosaurus]

Without the religious vote, Republican candidates are totally fried.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/04/MNDOT5CAA.DTL

[Gaffer]

Without the religious vote, Republican candidates are totally fried.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/04/MNDOT5CAA.DTL

I'm not religious and I'll be voting republican or independent.

[-Cp]

Without the religious vote, Republican candidates are totally fried.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/04/MNDOT5CAA.DTL

I'd be considered an "Evangelical" and I'm not upset at the choices.....

Are they "ideal"? No.. but sure a helluva a LOT better than the dems offer...

[gabosaurus]

Too bad you folks are not in the majority.

[manu1959]

Without the religious vote, Republican candidates are totally fried.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/11/04/MNDOT5CAA.DTL

guys like rudy will take more of the middle ......then...the far right will be faced with an interesting "sophies choice" .....

[hjmick]

Without the religious vote, Republican candidates are totally fried.

They will only have a problem if the so called Evangelicals stay home rather than vote. All indications so far are that they will be voting against the Democratic nominee rather than for the GOP nominee, in the event that they are not satisfied with the nominee of their party. In the end, the vote against could be detrimental to the Democrats.