*Does Anyone Here Like OCA: As A Person?*

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have had some rather difficult times with OCA.:poke:
2. Does anyone here really respect this *Bag~O~Crap*?
3. I have seen many fellow posters get into it with him.
4. Can anyone honestly say they truly like and would befriend this creep?
5. He is everything you hate in an enemy.
6. He's rude, rash, belligerent, foul mouthed, disrespectful of his elders, hates women, and more than likely hates his mother.
7. Anyway, its time to speak up for OCA, ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* is calling you out.
8. Give this board some reason to keep this, *Bag~O~Crap* on DP.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[glockmail]

I like him.

[OCA]

Remember the last poll you started on me? How did that 1 work out for ya?:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

[mrg666]

interestingly no poll

[glockmail]

interestingly no poll Why not have a poll and the loser has to resign from the board?

[OCA]

interestingly no poll


Chester's staff protecters did not want to see their bitch get embarrassed again so they deleted the poll.

Chester should consider himself lucky and move on.............to a different site.

[mrg666]

Chester's staff protecters did not want to see their bitch get embarrassed again so they deleted the poll.

Chester should consider himself lucky and move on.............to a different site.

if you had yor way there wouldnt be many folk here :laugh2:

[82Marine89]

I like him, his honesty, and his refusal to back down.

I also want to know where the poll is.

[OCA]

if you had yor way there wouldnt be many folk here :laugh2:

No, there wouldn't be any fools here. 9 out of 10 people here I have no problem with, and even those that I disagree with politically but they generally stay on topic and don't get into the personal stuff I have no problem with also, its those fools that seem to take umbarge at my direct style and think they have to take me on, those are the fools that get beat down.............much as what is happening with Chester right now.

[OCA]

I like him, his honesty, and his refusal to back down.

I also want to know where the poll is.

Told you 89, Chester is currently under staff protection right now, they removed the poll because the results would prove rather embarrassing to Chester and you just can't have that happening to your bitch.

[hjmick]

Don't know him.

[mrg666]

Don't know him.

who

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But all I got was "I like him".
2. We are going to need a little more than that folks.
3. Read what this guys saying man!
4. Try to explain what you like about him man!
5. Countless attacks on posters here is insane, why is OCA still here?
6. He's kind of like watching a very long slow train wreck,........

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[dan]

I like him as a person. I don't always like his posts, but he's always pretty funny and he definitely sticks to his guns no matter what.

[mrg666]

I like him as a person. I don't always like his posts, but he's always pretty funny and he definitely sticks to his guns no matter what.

agree he does actually have good points , it is the same here some of his posts are in extreme bad taste

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






I like him as a person. I don't always like his posts, but he's always pretty funny and he definitely sticks to his guns no matter what.



1. So you like Internet Bully's, who attack others with snide degrading foul mouthed remarks, that make you laugh?
2. Then he is petulant with more and more attacks on same person for no just call?
3. Great recommendation there Dan,.......

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[glockmail]

Sorry bout that,

1. But all I got was "I like him".
2. We are going to need a little more than that folks.
3. Read what this guys saying man!
4. Try to explain what you like about him man!
5. Countless attacks on posters here is insane, why is OCA still here?
6. He's kind of like watching a very long slow train wreck,........

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I answered your simple question in a simple way.

That being said, OCA stood up for me when I asked him. I can't say the same of others here. In fact I've been dmped on once or twice, and so has he.

[82Marine89]

I answered your simple question in a simple way.

That being said, OCA stood up for me when I asked him. I can't say the same of others here. In fact I've been dmped on once or twice, and so has he.

It's not gonna be the right answer unless you agree with him.

[OCA]

I answered your simple question in a simple way.

That being said, OCA stood up for me when I asked him. I can't say the same of others here. In fact I've been dmped on once or twice, and so has he.

Thats just it Glock, if you do right by me i'll always have your back no matter the situation. In fact I think thats it, Chester is clamoring for some of the love I ain't showing him.

[OCA]

It's not gonna be the right answer unless you agree with him.

Chester is worse than I am in this regard, he's stubborn without the intelligence.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have read your stuff glockmail, and on the most part your very respectable, and sane.
2. I have no issue with you whatsoever.
3. But really, OCA is over the top man!
4. You know it as well as everyone here knows it.
5. The dude is insane, is all I can say, but of course I will say more.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have read your stuff glockmail, and on the most part your very respectable, and sane.
2. I have no issue with you whatsoever.
3. But really, OCA is over the top man!
4. You know it as well as everyone here knows it.
5. The dude is insane, is all I can say, but of course I will say more.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

If he knew it he would've said it.

You are getting schooled, not sure why you like the abuse but..........damn its fun seeing you get embarrassed!

[glockmail]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have read your stuff glockmail, and on the most part your very respectable, and sane.
2. I have no issue with you whatsoever.
3. But really, OCA is over the top man!
4. You know it as well as everyone here knows it.
5. The dude is insane, is all I can say, but of course I will say more.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Chess you're the one who's demonstrated insanity here not OCA.

You've done some interesting posts so why not stick with that?

[glockmail]

Thats just it Glock, if you do right by me i'll always have your back no matter the situation. In fact I think thats it, Chester is clamoring for some of the love I ain't showing him.

You worry me when you use these phrases in the same post. :lol:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its all on you man, you're the sick looking bastard, without a real friend here.
2. I was searching the threads you've made every sense this site came into being.
3. Aprox. 95% of all the threads that ever came from you were attack threads.
4. Facts speak for themselves, you should go check it out.
5. Your whole reality is one big *LOSER ATTACK THREAD*.
6. Oh shit thats got to hurt, rrrrrreeeaaalllll bad!:laugh2:
7. ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* on the other hand has been here only a short time, and yet have contributed nearly 100 threads, to date.
8. Also old chap, couldn't help but notice, you OCA have been here sense inception, but have only contributed a measly 62 threads, and most *LOSER ATTACK THREADS*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its all on you man, you're the sick looking bastard, without a real friend here.
2. I was searching the threads you've made every sense this site came into being.
3. Aprox. 95% of all the threads that ever came from you were attack threads.
4. Facts speak for themselves, you should go check it out.
5. Your whole reality is one big *LOSER ATTACK THREAD*.
6. Oh shit thats got to hurt, rrrrrreeeaaalllll bad!:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Nah, lies don't really hurt.

You see you need to research both sites because they are so intertwined. I'm the king of debate annd attack, this cannot be disputed.

Guess you've missed the fact that noone has come into this thread supporting your position?:laugh2:

[OCA]

You worry me when you use these phrases in the same post. :lol:

You always got your mind on that shit!:laugh2:

[OCA]

OCA works, so OCA does not start many threads for the simple fact that once OCA gets home usually a thread has already been started on a subject that OCA read or heard about during his work travels.

Chester doesn't work so Chester has plenty of time to jerk off on the web.

[glockmail]

You always got your mind on that shit!:laugh2: Hey its all Greek to me.:coffee:

[OCA]

Hey its all Greek to me.:coffee:

If I had a quarter for everytime i've heard that phrase..............:finger3:

[glockmail]

....

Chester doesn't work so Chester has plenty of time to jerk off on the web.

In contrast to you and I who only have limited time to jerk off on the web. :poke:

[mrg666]

Hey its all Greek to me.:coffee:

greeks aren't queer any more apparently :laugh2:

[glockmail]

If I had a quarter for everytime i've heard that phrase..............:finger3:
You and my real-world Greek buddy. :dev3:

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But, *THE GREAT CWN* has been here sense Aug.
2. And I have managed to post far more threads than you have.
3. I have several businesses to run, but can still post threads from topics I want to start off the top of my head.
4. You OCA, are an *ATTACK DOG*, unless you have some one to attack, you got squat!:laugh2:
5. No body in their right mind would think like you do.
6. Thats why your a nutjob.:poke:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[glockmail]

greeks aren't queer any more apparently :laugh2:
IMO they were'n't in ancient times either. As I've said before 5000 years from now when some historian find the stats for Elton John record sales he'll conclude that the Brits and the US were full of butt-pirates. I think Greece got that same kind of rap.

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,

1. But, *THE GREAT CWN* has been here sense Aug.
2. And I have managed to post far more threads than you have.
3. I have several businesses to run, but can still post threads from topics I want to start off the top of my head.
4. You OCA, are an *ATTACK DOG*, unless you have some one to attack, you got squat!:laugh2:
5. No body in their right mind would think like you do.
6. Thats why your a nutjob.:poke:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

:laugh2::laugh2:
I loves to gets under a douchebag's skin!

Several businesses my ass! You aren't Psychoblues are you?:laugh2::laugh2:

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,

1. But, *THE GREAT CWN* has been here sense Aug.
2. And I have managed to post far more threads than you have.
3. I have several businesses to run, but can still post threads from topics I want to start off the top of my head.
4. You OCA, are an *ATTACK DOG*, unless you have some one to attack, you got squat!:laugh2:
5. No body in their right mind would think like you do.
6. Thats why your a nutjob.:poke:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Also............maybe off the top of your head ain't working out so well!:laugh2::laugh2:

This is way too easy, an 85 mph fastball right down the pipe.

[mrg666]

IMO they were'n't in ancient times either. As I've said before 5000 years from now when some historian find the stats for Elton John record sales he'll conclude that the Brits and the US were full of butt-pirates. I think Greece got that same kind of rap.

:D lol

every one forgets oscar wild prob the biggest english queer

[glockmail]

:D lol
Funny yes but true. "Some" historians have claimed many US historical figgers were queers. Its all part of the "gay agenda".

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,

1. But all I got was "I like him".
2. We are going to need a little more than that folks.
3. Read what this guys saying man!
4. Try to explain what you like about him man!
5. Countless attacks on posters here is insane, why is OCA still here?
6. He's kind of like watching a very long slow train wreck,........

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You attacked me, put me in a poll and yet you have the gumption to whine about OCA doing that....:poke:

[mrg666]

Funny yes but true. "Some" historians have claimed many US historical figgers were queers. Its all part of the "gay agenda".

and oscar ?
there never was a queer agenda , it was just tabboo and illegal in those days
unlike today.

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have had some rather difficult times with OCA.:poke:
2. Does anyone here really respect this *Bag~O~Crap*?
3. I have seen many fellow posters get into it with him.
4. Can anyone honestly say they truly like and would befriend this creep?
5. He is everything you hate in an enemy.
6. He's rude, rash, belligerent, foul mouthed, disrespectful of his elders, hates women, and more than likely hates his mother.
7. Anyway, its time to speak up for OCA, ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* is calling you out.
8. Give this board some reason to keep this, *Bag~O~Crap* on DP.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I don't much care for either of you.. He's acts like an asshole, a lot of times for no reason, but you're just a fucking idiot all around. :)

[mrg666]

You attacked me, put me in a poll and yet you have the gumption to whine about OCA doing that....:poke:

woof woof :laugh2:

[OCA]

I don't much care for either of you.. He's acts like an asshole, a lot of times for no reason, but you're just a fucking idiot all around. :)

No surprise for this coming from Shattered towards me, we have history.

But I gotta say she never said what she said about Chester about me.

:laugh2::laugh2:

[mrg666]

:D lol

every one forgets oscar wild prob the biggest english queer

sorry anglo irish queer :laugh2:

[glockmail]

and oscar ?
there never was a queer agenda , it was just tabboo and illegal in those days
unlike today.
Yes currently in Massachusetts it's legal for queers to marry. That makes them worse than ancient Greece.

[mrg666]

Yes currently in Massachusetts it's legal for queers to marry. That makes them worse than ancient Greece.

i consider this to be a case of keep away from me and i dgaf

[hjmick]

who

OCA.

[mrg666]

OCA.

all good :laugh2:

[mrg666]

No, there wouldn't be any fools here. 9 out of 10 people here I have no problem with, and even those that I disagree with politically but they generally stay on topic and don't get into the personal stuff I have no problem with also, its those fools that seem to take umbarge at my direct style and think they have to take me on, those are the fools that get beat down.............much as what is happening with Chester right now.

so how comes iv'e never been beaten down ?

[82Marine89]

Hey its all Greek to me.:coffee:


If I had a quarter for everytime i've heard that phrase..............:finger3:

Do they say it behind your back? :laugh2:

[glockmail]

i consider this to be a case of keep away from me and i dgaf If they were indoctrinating your kids you would.

[OCA]

so how comes iv'e never been beaten down ?

Out of respect for Sir Evil who asked me to take it easy on you and who said you were basically a good man.

[mrg666]

Out of respect for Sir Evil who asked me to take it easy on you and who said you were basically a good man.

hey
i would hate to think that you did that. whats your own opinion then after a few weeks of swords crossing

[mrg666]

If they were indoctrinating your kids you would.

i keep a good eye on my kids (17 and 15 now ) have you got somthing to tell us ?

[diuretic]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have had some rather difficult times with OCA.:poke:
2. Does anyone here really respect this *Bag~O~Crap*?
3. I have seen many fellow posters get into it with him.
4. Can anyone honestly say they truly like and would befriend this creep?
5. He is everything you hate in an enemy.
6. He's rude, rash, belligerent, foul mouthed, disrespectful of his elders, hates women, and more than likely hates his mother.
7. Anyway, its time to speak up for OCA, ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* is calling you out.
8. Give this board some reason to keep this, *Bag~O~Crap* on DP.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I have no doubt Chess that when you converse you don't use a preamble and you don't speak in numbered points. That's because you aren't really the poster called Chess. Chess is what you have manufactured. Same with me, same with OCA, same with everyone.

I don't take much seriously here, except ideas.

[Sitarro]

What's wrong with OCA? He seems to be a very honest, stand up guy. He says what he means and means what he says, very rare in this world, I admire that about him.

[diuretic]

:D lol

every one forgets oscar wild prob the biggest english queer

Irish (just in case anyone else hasn't pointed it out :D)

[diuretic]

sorry anglo irish queer :laugh2:

Oops, I jumped too early :coffee:

[mrg666]

Oops, I jumped too early :coffee:

lol

sorry anglo irish queer :laugh2:

[mrg666]

Oops, I jumped too early :coffee:

me as well
sorry

[mrg666]

i realised my mistake just after posting but did not want to edit lol

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this test from *THE GREAT CWN* has worked.
2. I posted one thread, and now we have seen some 60 posts, while OCA made two threads bashing me, and He barely got thirty posts for both of them combined!
3. This in itself shows his lack of ability.
4. And when I post an attack thread on him, he gets lots of people jabbering about him.
5. Good or bad folks, OCA is a *LOSER*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this test from *THE GREAT CWN* has worked.
2. I posted one thread, and now we have seen some 60 posts, while OCA mad two threads bashing me, and He barely got thirty posts!
3. This in itself shows his lack of ability.
4. And when I post an attack thread on him, he gets lots of people jabbering about him.
5. Good or bad folks, OCA is a *LOSER*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Actually we all bashed you on your own thread and defended him.
*LOSER*:slap:

[mrg666]

Sorry bout that,

1. But this test from *THE GREAT CWN* has worked.
2. I posted one thread, and now we have seen some 60 posts, while OCA made two threads bashing me, and He barely got thirty posts!
3. This in itself shows his lack of ability.
4. And when I post an attack thread on him, he gets lots of people jabbering about him.
5. Good or bad folks, OCA is a *LOSER*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

hey im with you for better or worse but read all the content first a lot is off topic

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


hey im with you for better or worse but read all the content first a lot is off topic

1. Doesn't matter, you forgot I'm a numbers guy.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[manu1959]

oca = :cool:

[mrg666]

Sorry bout that,



1. Doesn't matter, you forgot I'm a numbers guy.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

so numbers wont work here



oca = :cool:


?

[jimnyc]

Chester's staff protecters did not want to see their bitch get embarrassed again so they deleted the poll.

Chester should consider himself lucky and move on.............to a different site.


Told you 89, Chester is currently under staff protection right now, they removed the poll because the results would prove rather embarrassing to Chester and you just can't have that happening to your bitch.

Staff didn't delete a damn thing and I wish you would stop involving us in your vendettas. If you 2 want to embarrass yourselves by carrying this on forever, so be it, but you're not going to involve staff in your flames, and it's not going to carry over to what are otherwise good threads on the rest of the board.

[OCA]

Staff didn't delete a damn thing and I wish you would stop involving us in your vendettas. If you 2 want to embarrass yourselves by carrying this on forever, so be it, but you're not going to involve staff in your flames, and it's not going to carry over to what are otherwise good threads on the rest of the board.

Then where is the fucking poll? As far as I know he can't delete the poll after the fact.

[jimnyc]

Then where is the fucking poll? As far as I know he can't delete the poll after the fact.

I have no idea. When I logged on this morning there was no poll. Maybe he didn't add one! Maybe he's simply asking a question with his thread? I do know that according to the logs, which only I have access to, nothing was deleted.

[OCA]

I have no idea. When I logged on this morning there was no poll. Maybe he didn't add one! Maybe he's simply asking a question with his thread? I do know that according to the logs, which only I have access to, nothing was deleted.

There was a poll, I saw it with my own eyes, others saw it also which is why others are asking where the poll went.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* love watching OCA melt down.
2. And of course I have to use the deady word now on him.
3. His posting style has been on the most part nothing put *ATTACKS*



4. And I'm calling him what he is, (*PATHETIC*):blowup:
5. That'll do it:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[remie]

Sorry bout that,

1. But ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* love watching OCA melt down.
2. And of course I have to use the deady word now on him.
3. His posting style has been on the most part nothing put *ATTACKS*



4. And I'm calling him what he is, (*PATHETIC*):blowup:
5. That'll do it:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

If you think he is so pathetic, why wont you debate him in the debate section. I like OCA for his directness and firm stands on issues. CWN, I cant tell what the hell you stand for.

[glockmail]

There was a poll, I saw it with my own eyes, others saw it also which is why others are asking where the poll went. I think the old-timers disease is setting in. :poke:

[glockmail]

i keep a good eye on my kids (17 and 15 now ) have you got somthing to tell us ? Yeah, to your kids: Y'all should be greatful that your old man didn't subject them to Massachusetts.

[jimnyc]

There was a poll, I saw it with my own eyes, others saw it also which is why others are asking where the poll went.

100% false.

CWN has confirmed he never placed a poll in this thread. And even if he himself edited anything it would show up right in the thread. Glockmail was the very first person to come across this thread and reply and has also stated there was no poll here when he came. I saw one other person simply ask why there is no poll here. Nobody other than you is claiming that a poll disappeared. I've checked with members for confirmation as well as a thorough check of the board logs. No poll ever existed, no poll was removed - and most importantly, your claims that staff is covering for someone are 100% false and without any merit whatsoever.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






If you think he is so pathetic, why wont you debate him in the debate section. I like OCA for his directness and firm stands on issues. CWN, I cant tell what the hell you stand for.



1. But I won't lower myself to debate with an, *ATTACK DOG*.
2. I have told him many times already, that all I will do with him on DP, is *RANT*.
3. Why should ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* slink over to his level and debate a subject we both agree upon?
4. OCA is freakin *INSANE*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




100% false.

CWN has confirmed he never placed a poll in this thread. And even if he himself edited anything it would show up right in the thread. Glockmail was the very first person to come across this thread and reply and has also stated there was no poll here when he came. I saw one other person simply ask why there is no poll here. Nobody other than you is claiming that a poll disappeared. I've checked with members for confirmation as well as a thorough check of the board logs. No poll ever existed, no poll was removed - and most importantly, your claims that staff is covering for someone are 100% false and without any merit whatsoever.



1. Oh wow I can't resist.
2. This would be in fact where Jimmy is calling OCA a, oh man this is a goody, ahhhh, wait I got to milk it a bit, (LIAR)



3. Wow, that felt good,... chew on that one OCA.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[remie]

Sorry bout that,









1. But I won't lower myself to debate with an, *ATTACK DOG*.
2. I have told him many times already, that all I will do with him on DP, is *RANT*.3. Why should ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* slink over to his level and debate a subject we both agree upon?
4. OCA is freakin *INSANE*.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Then it seems to me that makes you guilty of the same things you accuse him of

[glockmail]

Then it seems to me that makes you guilty of the same things you accuse him of Bingo.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I find it mildly amusing that remie calls me on my *RANT ON*, factor.
2. Sure I am a *RANTOR*, whats wrong with that?
3. I am not an *ATTACK DOG* though.
4. I didn't start attacking OCA, nor any of the baseline *ATTACK DOGS* , *82~LOSER~89* or *YURT*.
5. I just like normal people do, was *ATTACK* back.
6. With untold *RANTINGS*.
7. Its what I do.
8. When faced with the decision.:coffee:

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

[Roomy]

OCA a liar? theres a surprise:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

[jimnyc]

I'm certainly not stating that OCA is a liar. I don't think I've ever seen him lie before, and he certainly speaks his mind and isn't afraid to hold back! I just think he has threads confused, or assumed there was a poll by the title.

[remie]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I find it mildly amusing that remie calls me on my *RANT ON*, factor.
2. Sure I am a *RANTOR*, whats wrong with that?
3. I am not an *ATTACK DOG* though.
4. I didn't start attacking OCA, nor any of the baseline *ATTACK DOGS* , *82~LOSER~89* or *YURT*.
5. I just like normal people do, was *ATTACK* back.
6. With untold *RANTINGS*.
7. Its what I do.
8. When faced with the decision.:coffee:

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

I dont recall saying there is anything wrong with ranting....unless you berate another poster for doing it. Is there a double standard in place just for you?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Sure he lies, OCA lies all the time.
2. He made a false claim about a poll.
3. Well he, lied.
4. He said he saw it with his own two eyes.
5. Calling you a liar, basically.
6. But you went and discovered with research, that in fact he was lying, not yourself.
7. I just pointed out his lie, not putting words in your mouth.
8. Anyway, he earned this humiliation.
9. He says he likes to tell it like it is, let him do just that!:laugh2:
10. He isn't going to be let off this hook!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




I dont recall saying there is anything wrong with ranting....unless you berate another poster for doing it. Is there a double standard in place just for you?

1. There's no rules about ranting remie.
2. And what do you want a person to do when they get a foul mouthed attack dog coming at them unprovoked?
3. I guess you would simply lay down.
4. Anyway, good luck with that.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Abbey Marie]

Without commenting on any of the craziness going on in here lately, I just had to post to say, I have never seen OCA lie. If he says there was a poll, then I'm sure he really believes there was a poll.


Ralph Waldo Emerson:
Life is not so short but that there is always time enough for courtesy.

Barbara DeAngelis:
Love and kindness are never wasted.


That is all...

[remie]

Sorry bout that,





1. There's no rules about ranting remie.
2. And what do you want a person to do when they get a foul mouthed attack dog coming at them unprovoked?
3. I guess you would simply lay down.
4. Anyway, good luck with that.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Then I guess there is no problem with OCA's posting style.

Lay down? Nah I doubt it.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Without commenting on any of the craziness going on in here lately, I just had to post to say, I have never seen OCA lie. If he says there was a poll, then I'm sure he really believes there was a poll.




That is all...

1. I respectfully have to disagree.
2. With his constant attacks on members here, he is always lying.
3. He makes accusations towards people that are bold faced lies, and defamation's.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[shattered]

Without commenting on any of the craziness going on in here lately, I just had to post to say, I have never seen OCA lie. If he says there was a poll, then I'm sure he really believes there was a poll.




That is all...

Except, there was never a poll. It was just the question being asked.. OCA, KNOWING full well that polls can't be deleted by users blatantly accused staff of removing it, although he was a Mod at one time himself, and knows better, rather than using common sense.

THIS time, however, he got called on it, so perhaps he'll stop dragging staff into his arguments, and trying to use them as either a crutch, or a liability, depending on how it suits his agenda. I'm sure it would give some of the rest of us a bit of relief from the condescending bullshit being laid down.

Just my *humble* opinion, of course.

And while I'm at it, CWN, you're a fucking hypocrite and need to stop littering the board with your own bullshit. You're pulling the same crap you claim to be fighting.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,



shattered wrote thus:
And while I'm at it, CWN, you're a fucking hypocrite and need to stop littering the board with your own bullshit. You're pulling the same crap you claim to be fighting.[/QUOTE]



1. I have to admit, I have pulled it, after the fact.
2. I give what I get.
3. I have laid turds on a few threads that OCA was involved with.
4. Also *Yurts*, but I am not sure if I have done it yet to *82~LOSER~89*.
5. Maybe I just haven't gotten around to it yet.:laugh2:
6. Anyways, ( I ), *The GREAT CWN* do it for fun, not that I want to damage anyone directly here.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[jackass]

Didnt you ever hear of "two wrongs dont make a right"? What if we all did what you do?? Then the whole board would be nothing but lame ass polls and calling other people out....and THAT is lame!!

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




Didnt you ever hear of "two wrongs dont make a right"? What if we all did what you do?? Then the whole board would be nothing but lame ass polls and calling other people out....and THAT is lame!!



1. Thats how it pretty much is, at least those who get into it with the *LOSER BRIGADE*.
2. You don't think that, ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* am going to run away without a fight now do you?
3. Like I said, "I Give What I Get":laugh2:
4. Which is reasonable.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,







1. Thats how it pretty much is, at least those who get into it with the *LOSER BRIGADE*.
2. You don't think that, ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* am going to run away without a fight now do you?
3. Like I said, "I Give What I Get":laugh2:
4. Which is reasonable.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.



1. I don't even come close to OCA or his baseline attack dogs in personal attacks.
2. You know it and I know it.
3. Hell every one here knows it.
4. Even the *LOSER BRIGADE* themselves know it.
5. You really should try and read their posts.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,








1. I don't even come close to OCA or his baseline attack dogs in personal attacks.
2. You know it and I know it.
3. Hell every one here knows it.
4. Even the *LOSER BRIGADE* themselves know it.
5. You really should try and read their posts.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Having been a member of this board, and the other for a number of years, I've read pretty much every one of their posts, and I can guarantee you that you are no better than those you are insulting.

That said, you are still little more than an infantile hypocrite. Stop your whining, and be the change you wish to see in others.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Ahhhhhhahahahahaha,............
2. I Give What I Get.
3. Nuff Said!:laugh2:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Pale Rider]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have had some rather difficult times with OCA.:poke:
2. Does anyone here really respect this *Bag~O~Crap*?
3. I have seen many fellow posters get into it with him.
4. Can anyone honestly say they truly like and would befriend this creep?
5. He is everything you hate in an enemy.
6. He's rude, rash, belligerent, foul mouthed, disrespectful of his elders, hates women, and more than likely hates his mother.
7. Anyway, its time to speak up for OCA, ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* is calling you out.
8. Give this board some reason to keep this, *Bag~O~Crap* on DP.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I don't feel there's any need to apologise for it but yes, I like OCA. I've been posting with him for quite a few years now on Jimmy's boards, and I've talked with him on the phone. I actually wish I lived near him. We'd hang out no doubt. We have much in common. In fact, the only thing I can think of that we disagree on is illegal immigration.

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,

1. Ahhhhhhahahahahaha,............
2. I Give What I Get.
3. Nuff Said!:laugh2:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Now there's a classic comeback.. Blame the actions of others for your own actions.

Bet you had to dig deep to come up with that.

[Said1]

I don't mind OCA, he can really use his noodle when he wants.

[Kathianne]

I don't mind OCA, he can really use his noodle when he wants.

Yep, I've said repeatedly, I miss that OCA.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But, okay so some of you folks here, really really like him, for your own reason whatever it is.
2. Be it the long term relationships you formed, or how you always agree.
3. But if you want to defend his pointed attacks on others here, and I could make a huge list of his targets, which I shouldn't have to name names.
4. You condone his attacking people who for one reason or another, not their own, but some reason, in OCA's head, that they got into it with him, and he started beating his chest like he's freaking *KING KONG* of DP, and *CROWNED KING* of this place.:laugh2:
5. He isn't that *GREAT* folks.:poke:
6. Anybody with half a brain should be able to tell what he is doing isn't normal.
7. I will only *RANT~ON* with him, because, whatever the reason, he will get into a small insult war with anybody he is typing against.
8. Its just *ONE BIG ATTACK RANT*, for him, nothing else.
9. Now I enjoy a good rant at times, but not the kind of *ATTACK RANTS* he gets into.
10. Anyway, I understand how you may enjoy watching the daily train wrecks, he causes of threads.
11. But he leaves me no other choice but to call him out, along with his *BASELINE LOSERS*.
12. So whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
13. I give what I get.
14. And this is the, *STEEL CAGE* after-all.
15. What will he say and do next?
16. Check it out, here and a *Bag~O~Chips*, on DP.

:popcorn:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Yurt]

it takes two tango cry baby.

and for the record, of course I don't like this guy, he put me in a stupid poll among 2 friends that called us "losers." then wails and moans all day about what a "bully" OCA is. stop being a wuss and man up.

[Kathianne]

it takes two tango cry baby.

and for the record, of course I don't like this guy, he put me in a stupid poll among 2 friends that called us "losers." then wails and moans all day about what a "bully" OCA is. stop being a wuss and man up.

Exactly, man up or become what you CWA are decrying. I've stepped up several times to tell OCA I don't care for his bullying, but that doesn't take away from what has gone before. You have yet to prove yourself and you are whining now that we don't want to jump on OCA.

As I said, I've jumped on him plenty, he's pushed back too, yet neither of us have 'gone to the wall' which you've chosen to do, even though you've yet to 'prove' you are 'the all-knowing' or whatever over the top caption you are using tonight.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





it takes two tango cry baby.

and for the record, of course I don't like this guy, he put me in a stupid poll among 2 friends that called us "losers." then wails and moans all day about what a "bully" OCA is. stop being a wuss and man up.



1. Now you know why Yurt made the *LOSERS LIST*.
2. If anyone is crying its Yurt.
3. Like I've said, *I GIVE WHAT I GET*
4. Yurt attacked *THE GREAT CWN* right along side of OCA on a fairly good thread I started.
5. There was another *BASELINE LOSER* attacking, *THE GREAT CWN* during this pointless attack.
6. And it seems that the attack hasn't ended, but it has lessened now, for new rules about *TURDDYFING* threads have been put into place.:laugh2:
7. You got yourself lumped in with these two, you brought it upon yourself.:poke:
8. Don't forget I negggie repped you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Kathianne]

Sorry bout that,








1. Now you know why Yurt made the *LOSERS LIST*.
2. If anyone is crying its Yurt.
3. Like I've said, *I GIVE WHAT I GET*
4. Yurt attacked *THE GREAT CWN* right along side of OCA on a fairly good thread I started.
5. There was another *BASELINE LOSER* attacking, *THE GREAT CWN* during this pointless attack.
6. And it seems that the attack hasn't ended, but it has lessened now, for new rules about *TURDDYFING* threads have been put into place.:laugh2:
7. You got yourself lumped in with these two, you brought it upon yourself.:poke:
8. Don't forget I negggie repped you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
You continue to prove my point. FTR, I've never nepped you that I remember. But feel free to.

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. Now you know why Yurt made the *LOSERS LIST*.
2. If anyone is crying its Yurt.
3. Like I've said, *I GIVE WHAT I GET*
4. Yurt attacked *THE GREAT CWN* right along side of OCA on a fairly good thread I started.
5. There was another *BASELINE LOSER* attacking, *THE GREAT CWN* during this pointless attack.
6. And it seems that the attack hasn't ended, but it has lessened now, for new rules about *TURDDYFING* threads have been put into place.:laugh2:
7. You got yourself lumped in with these two, you brought it upon yourself.:poke:
8. Don't forget I negggie repped you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You're not supposed to talk publicly about the rep system. How would you like it if we all neg repped you and bragged about it?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




Exactly, man up or become what you CWA are decrying. I've stepped up several times to tell OCA I don't care for his bullying, but that doesn't take away from what has gone before. You have yet to prove yourself and you are whining now that we don't want to jump on OCA.

As I said, I've jumped on him plenty, he's pushed back too, yet neither of us have 'gone to the wall' which you've chosen to do, even though you've yet to 'prove' you are 'the all-knowing' or whatever over the top caption you are using tonight.



1. Yeah I've watched you call him on what he does before.
2. He gives you no mind.
3. I will never become what he is, not a chance.
4. *ALL KNOWING*,..hummm, might want to use that?????:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




You're not supposed to talk publicly about the rep system. How would you like it if we all neg repped you and bragged about it?



1. Look what the cat dragged in, 82~LOSER~89.
2. The third Part of the *DYNAMIC TRIO*.
3. Its the remarks made in the rep system which is to be kept private, you know that.
4. It matters not that I brought it up, just reminding Yurt how, he is the one that decried my neg repping him when he attacked me.
5. Of course I got it right back from him and you other two.
6. No biggie.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





You continue to prove my point. FTR, I've never nepped you that I remember. But feel free to.

1. I never said you did.
2. Why would I want to, you seem like a very reasonable and respectable person.:coffee:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Kathianne]

Sorry bout that,







1. Yeah I've watched you call him on what he does before.
2. He gives you no mind.
3. I will never become what he is, not a chance.
4. *ALL KNOWING*,..hummm, might want to use that?????:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Meaning he doesn't make a poll about me or call me names? Ok, I'll take that. On the other hand, you've no clue what is said off the boards. There is a reason that troll and your name comes up, a lot.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Meaning he doesn't make a poll about me or call me names? Ok, I'll take that. On the other hand, you've no clue what is said off the boards. There is a reason that troll and your name comes up, a lot.

1. Ahhh one of those slap you on the back and stick you with a blade comments.
2. I under~estimated you.:poke:
3. Let it out, you are starting to sound more like OCA than you ever thought that you could.
4. Might want to liven up the language a bit though.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Kathianne]

Sorry bout that,






1. Ahhh one of those slap you on the back and stick you with a blade comments.
2. I under~estimated you.:poke:
3. Let it out, you are starting to sound more like OCA than you ever thought that you could.
4. Might want to liven up the language a bit though.:laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

I don't 'back pat' and don't liven up language unless truly pissed off, which you are unlikely to elicit. Good night.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But in conclusion of this nights postings.
2. There are many here who really really like OCA.
3. Thats fine with me, I got no beef with that.
4. This isn't a popularity contest with me.
5. If I get attacked, I attack back.
6. He does the same I suppose.
7. So we go round and round.:poke:
8. I offered to OCA to have a moratorium on posting on each others threads.
9. He refused.
10. He told me he was going to get himself banned and take me with him.
11. Those be the facts folks.
12. I don't have any love lost between us.:dunno:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[manu1959]

Sorry bout that,

1. But in conclusion of this nights postings.
2. There are many here who really really like OCA.
3. Thats fine with me, I got no beef with that.
4. This isn't a popularity contest with me.
5. If I get attacked, I attack back.
6. He does the same I suppose.
7. So we go round and round.:poke:
8. I offered to OCA to have a moratorium on posting on each others threads.
9. He refused.
10. He told me he was going to get himself banned and take me with him.
11. Those be the facts folks.
12. I don't have any love lost between us.:dunno:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


don't play.......

[Kathianne]

don't play.......

Word.

[diuretic]

Look Chess, OCA is just a character. He's over the top and bombastic and at times bloody hilarious but it's just a self-drawn caricature. Getting into a lather over someone's online character is a bit like trying to get even with Mickey Mouse because his squeaky voice annoys you. :laugh2:






Although I suppose you could always buy a ticket for Disneyland and go and kick the crap out of him just before he does the big parade on Main Street :D

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,








1. Now you know why Yurt made the *LOSERS LIST*.
2. If anyone is crying its Yurt.
3. Like I've said, *I GIVE WHAT I GET*
4. Yurt attacked *THE GREAT CWN* right along side of OCA on a fairly good thread I started.5. There was another *BASELINE LOSER* attacking, *THE GREAT CWN* during this pointless attack.
6. And it seems that the attack hasn't ended, but it has lessened now, for new rules about *TURDDYFING* threads have been put into place.:laugh2:
7. You got yourself lumped in with these two, you brought it upon yourself.:poke:
8. Don't forget I negggie repped you.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Let's see this so great insult that I apparently did "once" that made YOU attack me like an idiot with an idiot poll. If I attack your posts, fine, but creating an immature dumbass poll in a THREAD calling me a loser escalated anything I may or may not have done to you.

Can't you see everyone is telling you shut up and stop acting like a child?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Let's see this so great insult that I apparently did "once" that made YOU attack me like an idiot with an idiot poll. If I attack your posts, fine, but creating an immature dumbass poll in a THREAD calling me a loser escalated anything I may or may not have done to you.

Can't you see everyone is telling you shut up and stop acting like a child?




1. Oh so you want to dig up the facts eh Yurt?
2. Thats quite easy to do, and you should be aware of said attacks.
3. You jumped in with the *ATTACK DOGS* on my *GAS STATION* thread.
4. Didn't take long, and it was dragged down into the *STEEL CAGE*.
5. You did that Yurt.
6. Yeah, you and OCA and *82~LOSER~89*.
7. Then of course OCA started calling me out, and I him you and the other one.
8. Its the least I could do.
9. Seems like you folks enjoy a good *RANT*.
10 So I am giving you one.:laugh2:
11. You want to keep up calling me childish, that really doesn't do it for me, I am throwing what I get right back into *YOUR FACE*!
12. I think you being attached to these two makes you squirm like a baby, and these feelings your getting is bubbling up.
13. Look I didn't ask for this, but I didn't run from it either.
14. I laughed you guys off from the begining, but at the same time, *I Gave What I Got*.
15. Look here too, ( I ), am *THE GREAT CWN*, I been getting pointless attacks for years, I'm tough as nails, I eat insults for breakfast, and laugh out loud while chomping them down.
16. Maybe you Yurt are out of your league eh pal?
17. Oh and you wanted to know where you strayed off the beaten path eh Yurt?
18. Right here: Yurt wrote:"You're not sorry and you aint smart. WTF does being greek have to do with his post? Bigot".
19. Just go read it yourself, its the *Muslim Gas Station* thread of mine.
20. Now go and bemoan it and how I forced you to attack, *THE GREAT CWN*.:slap:
21. Also I was browsing over self same thread, here's a little jewel of yours too:Yurt wrote: "You are pussy too cheesewars, neg rep me, chicken, bring it to the board if you are as "great" as you always claim."
22. I have been bringing it, and you three haven't you been feeling my *WRATH*? LOL!!!


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Yurt]

post your proof that has caused you to froth at the mouth and create threads about me.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Ahhhhahaha,...I don't *Froth* on anyone here or on the Internet.
2. I gave you already what made me tie you along with OCA and the other one.
3. In my last post.
4. You jumped in to the *GANG MENTALITY* on me *GAS STATION* thread.
5. Which is why your forever linked with the *OCA GANG*, in *THE GREAT CWN's* mind.
6. I suppose OCA got a temp ban, haven't seen his *RANT* lately.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Abbey Marie]

If he was banned, it would say so under his Avatar.

[diuretic]

Chess - OCA shoots through for a few days at a time. I don't blame him. I need a bit of a rest from it all myself now and again :laugh2:

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,

1. But, okay so some of you folks here, really really like him, for your own reason whatever it is.
2. Be it the long term relationships you formed, or how you always agree.
3. But if you want to defend his pointed attacks on others here, and I could make a huge list of his targets, which I shouldn't have to name names.
4. You condone his attacking people who for one reason or another, not their own, but some reason, in OCA's head, that they got into it with him, and he started beating his chest like he's freaking *KING KONG* of DP, and *CROWNED KING* of this place.:laugh2:
5. He isn't that *GREAT* folks.:poke:
6. Anybody with half a brain should be able to tell what he is doing isn't normal.
7. I will only *RANT~ON* with him, because, whatever the reason, he will get into a small insult war with anybody he is typing against.
8. Its just *ONE BIG ATTACK RANT*, for him, nothing else.
9. Now I enjoy a good rant at times, but not the kind of *ATTACK RANTS* he gets into.
10. Anyway, I understand how you may enjoy watching the daily train wrecks, he causes of threads.
11. But he leaves me no other choice but to call him out, along with his *BASELINE LOSERS*.
12. So whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
13. I give what I get.
14. And this is the, *STEEL CAGE* after-all.
15. What will he say and do next?
16. Check it out, here and a *Bag~O~Chips*, on DP.

:popcorn:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


You're not normal and mirroring his behavior isn't normal or overly entertaining, either. Not only that, if given the choice, based on past debates and discussions etc, I'd pick OCA anyday. But keep up the nonesense righ along with him. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, eh? :laugh2:


Remind me, what are you trying to prove again.....that your better or something? Just a quick re--cap will suffice, 4 points or less.

[Said1]

Sorry bout that,







1. Yeah I've watched you call him on what he does before.
2. He gives you no mind.
3. I will never become what he is, not a chance.
4. *ALL KNOWING*,..hummm, might want to use that?????:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Oh puleease:

1. you
2. are
3. a
4. troll
5. you try to act all honest and shit at first, with your little act
6. then
7. you
8. show
9. your
10. true
11. intent
12. which was always the same as it was a other boards where you are banned.
13. TROLL

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,



Oh puleease:

1. you
2. are
3. a
4. troll
5. you try to act all honest and shit at first, with your little act
6. then
7. you
8. show
9. your
10. true
11. intent
12. which was always the same as it was a other boards where you are banned.
13. TROLL



1. Troll??? ,......you are acting like a troll.
2. So it takes a troll to beat a troll?
3. Seeing OCA and his gang of three always trolled against those they didn't like and they said were weak or retards.
4. I must be a troll, because I defend myself?
5. You funny.
6. I'm a *TROLL SLAYER*.
7. If ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* becomes the target of a troll, I take them on.
8. Its happened before, and I will always defend my side.
9. Every-time.
10. Explain what you think makes me a *TROLL*?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Yurt]

TROLL

http://www.rateitall.com/topicimages/22619.jpg




:cool:

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,






1. Troll??? ,......you are acting like a troll.
2. So it takes a troll to beat a troll?
3. Seeing OCA and his gang of three always trolled against those they didn't like and they said were weak or retards.
4. I must be a troll, because I defend myself?
5. You funny.
6. I'm a *TROLL SLAYER*.
7. If ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* becomes the target of a troll, I take them on.
8. Its happened before, and I will always defend my side.
9. Every-time.
10. Explain what you think makes me a *TROLL*?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


How are you defending yourself by creating threads asking if anyone likes him?

[Yurt]

How are you defending yourself by creating threads asking if anyone likes him?

Oh I know, I have nine answers:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.


Unfortunately, like his posts, there is nothing next to the numbers

[shattered]

Oh I know, I have nine answers:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.


Unfortunately, like his posts, there is nothing next to the numbers

I was actually hoping for a bit more creativity.. Seems my expectations, as of late, are a tad high...

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




How are you defending yourself by creating threads asking if anyone likes him?




1. You should take the time to read the first post.
2. It was a *CWN ATTACK* unrivaled by most mortals.
3. This is the, *STEEL CAGE*.
4. And after countless attacks from OCA.
5. I thought I would keep returning him the favor.
6. Like I've said before, *I Give what I Get*.
7. I am not centering my attacks on some un~worthy DP subject.
8. I am fulfilling prophecy, tearing down the local so called prophet, OCA.
9. Don't mess with *TEXANS*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[shattered]

Sorry bout that,








1. You should take the time to read the first post.
2. It was a *CWN ATTACK* unrivaled by most mortals.
3. This is the, *STEEL CAGE*.
4. And after countless attacks from OCA.
5. I thought I would keep returning him the favor.
6. Like I've said before, *I Give what I Get*.
7. I am not centering my attacks on some un~worthy DP subject.
8. I am fulfilling prophecy, tearing down the local so called prophet, OCA.
9. Don't mess with *TEXANS*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas


Again, and do be specific, how are you defending yourself by asking if people like OCA?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its a classic *TAG LINE* of *THE GREAT CWN*.
2. A colorful lead, to get the ball rolling.
3. Also its an attempt to find who it is that supports OCA, and drive a wedge between your personal feelings, and your gut feelings.
4. Some times you have to stop supporting the *MADNESS*.:coffee:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. You should take the time to read the first post.
2. It was a *CWN ATTACK* unrivaled by most mortals.
3. This is the, *STEEL CAGE*.
4. And after countless attacks from OCA.
5. I thought I would keep returning him the favor.
6. Like I've said before, *I Give what I Get*.
7. I am not centering my attacks on some un~worthy DP subject.
8. I am fulfilling prophecy, tearing down the local so called prophet, OCA.
9. Don't mess with *TEXANS*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a28/82Marine89/Retard-1950s.jpg

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. Seems one of the, *BASELINE LOSERS* piped in.
2. Typically just posts pictures.
3. Along with a link.
4. He's deep.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[82Marine89]

Sorry bout that,

1. Seems one of the, *BASELINE LOSERS* piped in.
2. Typically just posts pictures.
3. Along with a link.
4. He's deep.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Why don't you debate OCA? You claim to be some great mass debater. Take him on in the topic of your choice. You claim to be so great, so back it up. If you want, I'll debate you on the topic of your choice and I'll take the opposing view. It's time to put up or shut up CheeseWhiz.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






Why don't you debate OCA? You claim to be some great mass debater. Take him on in the topic of your choice. You claim to be so great, so back it up. If you want, I'll debate you on the topic of your choice and I'll take the opposing view. It's time to put up or shut up CheeseWhiz.



1. Well partner, I don't debate, *BASELINE LOSERS*.
2. I don't know why you and OCA want to debate me.
3. I find your aggressiveness to debate me on anything, to be absurd.
4. Did I say I was on the *High School Debate Team*?
5. Whats with you creeps?
6. You guys are my *NEW RANT BUDS*, thats it!
7. I know your mentality as is OCA and Yurts is, *HIGH SHOOL* equivalent.
8. But do try and grow up a little.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Yurt]

I was actually hoping for a bit more creativity.. Seems my expectations, as of late, are a tad high...

would you have liked ten answers then? sorry bout the nine

[Yurt]

Sorry bout that,








1. You should take the time to read the first post.
2. It was a *CWN ATTACK* unrivaled by most mortals.
3. This is the, *STEEL CAGE*.
4. And after countless attacks from OCA.
5. I thought I would keep returning him the favor.
6. Like I've said before, *I Give what I Get*.
7. I am not centering my attacks on some un~worthy DP subject.
8. I am fulfilling prophecy, tearing down the local so called prophet, OCA.
9. Don't mess with *TEXANS*.:laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You are an idiot. You have given back FAR more than you allegedly ever received.

Instead of being a whiny bitch, go and debate him one on one. You are the effing GREAT CWN, afterall. Yet you are here posting garbage instead of actually debating OCA, which he invited you to. Guess who is the "loser."

Doode, get a hobby other than being an internet bully. OCA is an ass sometimes, but he almost always backs his shit up. When he debates, he debates hard and brings the point home. Sure his goes off "now and then" but he debates hard and his points are usually good. And he debates good points in a true debate. You are the idiot that thought you could match OCA by "playing" like him. Its like you're a child. Like it or not, OCA debates BETTER than you and has been here FAR longer than you. Ok. you thought you would "show him." LOOOOL. You have only made a laughing stock of yourself. I personally don't care if you were here longer than OCA, you have made a complete ASS out of yourself.

Why? Because you did not start the Board this way. I think someone mentioned you getting banned at many boards, well, doesn't take a rocket scientists to see who really is "great". Ban boy. Get off your keyboard and get a life. Go breath some fresh air, see nature, you will come back here with a better attitude.

[mrg666]

cwn you arent doing any good when the guys not even around to respond to you . give it a rest

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




You are an idiot. You have given back FAR more than you allegedly ever received.

Instead of being a whiny bitch, go and debate him one on one. You are the effing GREAT CWN, afterall. Yet you are here posting garbage instead of actually debating OCA, which he invited you to. Guess who is the "loser."

Doode, get a hobby other than being an internet bully. OCA is an ass sometimes, but he almost always backs his shit up. When he debates, he debates hard and brings the point home. Sure his goes off "now and then" but he debates hard and his points are usually good. And he debates good points in a true debate. You are the idiot that thought you could match OCA by "playing" like him. Its like you're a child. Like it or not, OCA debates BETTER than you and has been here FAR longer than you. Ok. you thought you would "show him." LOOOOL. You have only made a laughing stock of yourself. I personally don't care if you were here longer than OCA, you have made a complete ASS out of yourself.

Why? Because you did not start the Board this way. I think someone mentioned you getting banned at many boards, well, doesn't take a rocket scientists to see who really is "great". Ban boy. Get off your keyboard and get a life. Go breath some fresh air, see nature, you will come back here with a better attitude.



1. But coming from one of the, *BASELINE LOSERS*, I have to LOL.:laugh2:
2. Like you have finally come to reason, and it is, ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* who is acting like OCA, who in reality its just that, ( I ) am doing the, *CWN ATTACK*.
3. Saying I have given back more than I got, is rather telling, seems your feeling the *CWN WRATH* too little feller?:laugh2:
4. OCA was here when the board kicked off, I never said I was here longer than he.
5. Yurt wrote: "Sure his goes off "now and then" but he debates hard and his points are usually good."I don't think ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* has ever brought up his debating skills one way or the other, I couldn't careless about it in reality.
6. I find it Hilarious he said thus: "Doode, get a hobby other than being an internet bully." So your saying that I have become the thing that I'm defending myself against, even from you too? Wrong dude~a~rooney, I have never attacked others personally, not when I came here, and certainly not on other sites, unless I was defending myself.
7. So your saying my beating down the *INTERNET BULLY* here, and I am the one being loled at is quite telling if in fact true, it would show that some people here are no better than OCA, unable to determine that OCA is a despicable person the way he attacks others without provocation, then goes way out of his way to grind them under his feet, while those like yourself, should know,*ITS WRONG*.
8. I've been banned from many sites, I don't see how this fact is an issue here.
9. I'm not the person in question here, I haven't been treating others here disrespectfully, or bullying them.
10. I have defended myself, you seem to think I am going over board with it, but this is a war of words, maybe I am just simply, *CORRECT*, and you are starting to see the error of your ways.
11.mrg666 wrote: "cwn you arent doing any good when the guys not even around to respond to you . give it a rest", MrG666, just answering OCA's defenders, I see nothing wrong with it myself, I find it strange he gave up and hasn't posted in a couple days, maybe he is growing up after all, some at least.
( :poke:defenders of OCA ):laugh2:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Roomy]

I have had numerous run ins with OCA, we hate each other......only we don't, at least I don't hate him.I love to hate him and his posts.If you were to research our history you will find that we quite often make hypocrites of ourselves just to disagree with whatever the other is saying.I laugh and giggle to myself about it, I imagine he is bashing his thick skull against the wall in demented frustration having failed to get the best of me......again:laugh2:

[shattered]

would you have liked ten answers then? sorry bout the nine

I was referring to the standard "I give what I get" answers Lord Dipshit keeps giving.. :)

[trobinett]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I have had some rather difficult times with OCA.:poke:
2. Does anyone here really respect this *Bag~O~Crap*?
3. I have seen many fellow posters get into it with him.
4. Can anyone honestly say they truly like and would befriend this creep?
5. He is everything you hate in an enemy.
6. He's rude, rash, belligerent, foul mouthed, disrespectful of his elders, hates women, and more than likely hates his mother.
7. Anyway, its time to speak up for OCA, ( I ) *THE GREAT CWN* is calling you out.
8. Give this board some reason to keep this, *Bag~O~Crap* on DP.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

OCA is an ass hole just like you.

Is this a difficult line of thinking for you two dip shits to follow?

Never seen two people, that just can't "get it".

The fact, that a web site allows the likes of you guys to post, day, after day is just fucking amazing.

I say to both of them, fuck off and die, today would be good.:fu::pee::slap::poke::salute:

[OCA]

OCA is an ass hole just like you.

Is this a difficult line of thinking for you two dip shits to follow?

Never seen two people, that just can't "get it".

The fact, that a web site allows the likes of you guys to post, day, after day is just fucking amazing.

I say to both of them, fuck off and die, today would be good.:fu::pee::slap::poke::salute:

Fuck you trobinett.

Where in the hell do you get off chiming in days after I end this fool Chester? One would think that you are trying to stir up shit, are you?

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Fuck you trobinett.

Where in the hell do you get off chiming in days after I end this fool Chester? One would think that you are trying to stir up shit, are you?



1. Spoken like a true, *INTERNET BULLY*.
2. This shit writes itself!
3. *LOSER!*

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,








1. Spoken like a true, *INTERNET BULLY*.
2. This shit writes itself!
3. *LOSER!*

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

OCA 9 Chester 1

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





(A) OCA is an ass hole just like you.

(B) Is this a difficult line of thinking for you two dip shits to follow?

(C) Never seen two people, that just can't "get it".

(D) The fact, that a web site allows the likes of you guys to post, day, after day is just fucking amazing.

(E) I say to both of them, fuck off and die, today would be good.:fu::pee::slap::poke::salute:



1. Why am I an asshole for defending myself, and others on this site?
1. a) I do whats right.
2. I think you are correct, we all are wasting a lot of effort in bashing each other, but that's all OCA and his gang have left.
3. There's at least four people, and I understand what your saying, but these *LOSERS* have tried to gang tackle *THE GREAT CWN*, and instead of tackling me, I have swung around my huge arm, and swiped them all to the ground like rag dolls.
4. Well, Jimmy allows it now just in *THE STEEL CAGE*, he's has thrown down the gauntlet that it doesn't happen upstairs, in fact, they will abuse this fact always, for they are what I say they are, *INTERNET BULLYS*, at some point he will perma~ban these, *LOSERS*, he will have too, at some point.
5. I kind of resent that, I am a defender of the *TRUTH*, but I understand why you said it, your tired, might I suggest you not come into, *THE STEEL CAGE*, then?:coffee:

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Joan]

In case it matters, I happen to like OCA.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


In case it matters, I happen to like OCA.




1. Sure it matters, but can you explain why you like OCA?

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,






1. Sure it matters, but can you explain why you like OCA?

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

Its been explained to you a dozen times by a dozen different people, are you this fucking stupid?

Your act is wearing thin on many members.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,



Its been explained to you a dozen times by a dozen different people, are you this fucking stupid?

Your act is wearing thin on many members.



1. Let her answer, I want to hear what she says.
2. Are you afraid to let her speak up for you?
3. Let her have her say.

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,






1. Let her answer, I want to hear what she says.
2. Are you afraid to let her speak up for you?
3. Let her have her say.

Regards,
SirJAmesofTexas

She's had her say, dozens of times on both boards, but what the hell, if you like embarrassing yourself further by all means let her have her say.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,






She's had her say, dozens of times on both boards, but what the hell, if you like embarrassing yourself further by all means let her have her say.



1. I just can't see what an older lady would see in you or the others as being worthy for anything else but a slap in the face for the likes of ya'll man.
2. Older people who were born of the depression have a deep respect for people and their views.
3. And they have a moral compass for they are *The Greatest Generation*.
4. Reading your attack threads on folks here, disqualifies you of anything, *MORAL*.
5. You are and scoundrel and a *Bag~O~Crap* plain and simple, not unlike the other two *BASELINE LOSERS*.:laugh2::laugh2:
6. Maybe you have some skills in debating, but thats besides the point, you're a *INTERNET BULLY*.
7. If it was counted how many times you used, the term, " The only thing happening here is my balls banging into your chin", I bet it would be no less than a hundred.
8. And thats very gay I might add as well.:gay::gay::gay:
9. You use that all the time, you have to be a fag!
10. Don't you realize how faggish that statement makes you sound?

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Joan]

First, I'm getting damn sick and tired of seeing your "sorry about that".

Now, for OCA:
1. He can be a gentleman when treated that way
2. He has a good sense of humor
3. He has never said anything unkind that I know of that wasn't asked for
I could go on, but you will just add your usual shit trying to prove you're right - AND YOU'RE NOT.:cheers2:

[OCA]

First, I'm getting damn sick and tired of seeing your "sorry about that".

Now, for OCA:
1. He can be a gentleman when treated that way
2. He has a good sense of humor
3. He has never said anything unkind that I know of that wasn't asked for
I could go on, but you will just add your usual shit trying to prove you're right - AND YOU'RE NOT.:cheers2:

KAPOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:laugh2:

Than you maam.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I felt it was time to go gather some vintage OCA.
2. What is so lovable about this?
3. This stuff writes itself.



OCA wrote, in an OP of a thread months ago, one of his first here"


"

Loose refuses to debate me in queer marriage thread

Loose only has adhom

Loose can't debate and he/she knows it

Loose has no credibility left on board

Loose is the most owned individual in the history of DP/USMB

"

4. More proof of he being an *INTERNET BULLY* from early on.
5. Its to easy folks!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





First, I'm getting damn sick and tired of seeing your "sorry about that".

Now, for OCA:
1. He can be a gentleman when treated that way
2. He has a good sense of humor
3. He has never said anything unkind that I know of that wasn't asked for
I could go on, but you will just add your usual shit trying to prove you're right - AND YOU'RE NOT.:cheers2:



1. I won't argue with Jimmy's mom.
2. OCA does say some funny stuff at times, agreed.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Sir Evil]

4. More proof of he being an *INTERNET BULLY* from early on.



Doesn't sounds as though you have learned anything from the playground days, dealing with what you deem a bully surely doesn't appear to be getting anywhere.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Doesn't sounds as though you have learned anything from the playground days, dealing with what you deem a bully surely doesn't appear to be getting anywhere.



1. I have made some inroads.
2. And its not over, not by a long shot!
3. This is just a big old, *RANTFEST*, everyone can get into it.
4. So I am not alone here.
5. I have many supporters on my side, but I want them to stay in the shadows, and not expose themselves.
6. Creating more *INTERNET BULLY* fodder.
7. I can handle this.
8. I'm a paid professional!:laugh2:
9. Oh and where the hell's Burt~Ernie?


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

5. I have many supporters on my side, but I want them to stay in the shadows, and not expose themselves.



Will the lies ever stop?

[OCA]

Doesn't sounds as though you have learned anything from the playground days, dealing with what you deem a bully surely doesn't appear to be getting anywhere.


Its because I ain't no bully, I tell it straight, I don't lie to people, thats being honest not bullying.

Chester just don't like me opening up truths about himself that he'd rather bury, in order to deflect from the facts I raise about him he starts up some bully bullshit.

I call his tactics "being a pussy".

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,

1. But I felt it was time to go gather some vintage OCA.
2. What is so lovable about this?
3. This stuff writes itself.



OCA wrote, in an OP of a thread months ago, one of his first here"


"

Loose refuses to debate me in queer marriage thread

Loose only has adhom

Loose can't debate and he/she knows it

Loose has no credibility left on board

Loose is the most owned individual in the history of DP/USMB

"

4. More proof of he being an *INTERNET BULLY* from early on.
5. Its to easy folks!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

What proof? Proof of what? Loose refused to debate me, thats a fact.

This place has no room for weakkneed individuals such as yourself............move on, I hear there is room at nickjr.com, nobody will be tough on you there.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




What proof? Proof of what? Loose refused to debate me, thats a fact.

This place has no room for weakkneed individuals such as yourself............move on, I hear there is room at nickjr.com, nobody will be tough on you there.


1. Thats what you started as a thread was *INTERNET BULLYING*, its a fact.
2. It was early in this site, like two weeks into it.
3. You lie.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,






1. Thats what you started as a thread was *INTERNET BULLYING*, its a fact.
2. It was early in this site, like two weeks into it.
3. You lie.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Nope, i'm just a tough fucking badass, get used to it.

Dealing with me is not for rice paper skinners like you.

If thats considered internet bullying then internet bullying is cool as shit! But since its not...................

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Nope, i'm just a tough fucking badass, get used to it.

Dealing with me is not for rice paper skinners like you.

If thats considered internet bullying then internet bullying is cool as shit! But since its not...................



1. I have properly labeled you guys.
2. If some one has an opinion you don't like, you start this shit.
3. You don't, *Agree to Disagree*, you attack that person, personally.
4. That's, *INTENET BULLYING* its just common sense.
5. You hate the fact that, ( I ), *THE GREAT CWN* has called you on it, and you're all squirming to get out of it.
6. Ain't going to happen, I got you all by the nap of the neck and am *BLASTING YOU GUYS IN THE GUTS WITH IT*.:laugh2:
7. You guys just don't know who you're dealing with yet, yea shall learn!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Was doing some digging on OCA, came across this thread he created.
2. It more than proves he's a first class, *HYPOCRITE*.
3. He wanted to know why others use the *INVISABLE* feature, and called a bunch of people out, doing his, *INTENET BULLY* routine.
4. Even called out Jimmy, the owner.:slap:
5. Check it out here:

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=2137&page=2
"

I'm gonna piss off alot of people with this but I think using the invisible mode is a clear indication of weakness, indicates you are afraid of someone or something.


"
5. a) Hehehehehehehehe,.....very telling,............


and this:

"
Ok, opinion noted. But question, is there an underlying reason as to why its used?

In the case of Jimmy I can see why(although he's a pussy too) he gets every douchebag lib crying to him about how thet were treated unfairly or they got their feeling hurt blah blah blah and i'm sure when they can see he's online he gets bombarded.

Other than him don't see why.

"
6. This stuff writes itself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:laugh2::laugh2:
7. He is always in *INVISABLE MODE*, what a *LOSER*.
8. *BLASTED YOU IN THE GUT AGAIN*!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,


1. Was doing some digging on OCA, came across this thread he created.
2. It more than proves he's a first class, *HYPOCRITE*.
3. He wanted to know why others use the *INVISABLE* feature, and called a bunch of people out, doing his, *INTENET BULLY* routine.
4. Even called out Jimmy, the owner.:slap:
5. Check it out here:

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=2137&page=2
"

I'm gonna piss off alot of people with this but I think using the invisible mode is a clear indication of weakness, indicates you are afraid of someone or something.


"
5. a) Hehehehehehehehe,.....very telling,............


and this:

"
Ok, opinion noted. But question, is there an underlying reason as to why its used?

In the case of Jimmy I can see why(although he's a pussy too) he gets every douchebag lib crying to him about how thet were treated unfairly or they got their feeling hurt blah blah blah and i'm sure when they can see he's online he gets bombarded.

Other than him don't see why.

"
6. This stuff writes itself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:laugh2::laugh2:
7. He is always in *INVISABLE MODE*, what a *LOSER*.
8. *BLASTED YOU IN THE GUT AGAIN*!!!!!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Opinion changed after being on staff for a while and receiving a constant barrage of pm's once i'd log on.

Nice try though. Your time here is running short.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





Opinion changed after being on staff for a while and receiving a constant barrage of pm's once i'd log on.

Nice try though. Your time here is running short.



1. Not even getting warmed up yet!
2. I'm the freakin 900 pound *SASQUATCH* in the room.
3. Never doubt my staying power.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[Joan]

1. I won't argue with Jimmy's mom.
2. OCA does say some funny stuff at times, agreed.



I don't think either of my son's would stand up for me if they though I'd done or said anything wrong. I argue with them both all the time. I sorta resent being referred to as "older lady", but I guess I the shoe fits, wear it. I truly believe in treating people as they treat me. Yes, I grew up in the depression and remember the end of WWII like it was yesterday! I also remember being scared to death that someone was going to drop an atom bomb on us. We had bomb exercises in school where we had to go out into the halls, crouch down in front of out lockers with coats over our heads until an all clear siren was rung. At home we had to have black out shades in every room. When the siren sounded, all shades had to be pulled down, and lights turned off (yes, the did have electricity then), Eventually an all clear signal would go out and we could breathe again. But I also lived through the 50's (one of the greatest generations) And I even remember Elvis's first appearance on the Ed Sullivan show (as I look up at his pictures now)!


Further, you didn't answer why everything you write starts with "sorry about that"

[OCA]

Sorry bout that,








1. Not even getting warmed up yet!
2. I'm the freakin 900 pound *SASQUATCH* in the room.
3. Never doubt my staying power.



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

You will never get warmed up, you're done, finished.

By all accounts and by all opinions i've soundly defeated you. There is nobody in your corner despite your claims of such or else they would come out and say so............unless you think everyone is stupid enough to believe ypu bullshit about the shadows.

I've beat the piss out of you, i've been independently declared winner.

Maybe we'll talk in the short time you have left here.

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,





1. I won't argue with Jimmy's mom.
2. OCA does say some funny stuff at times, agreed.



I don't think either of my son's would stand up for me if they though I'd done or said anything wrong. I argue with them both all the time. I sorta resent being referred to as "older lady", but I guess I the shoe fits, wear it. I truly believe in treating people as they treat me. Yes, I grew up in the depression and remember the end of WWII like it was yesterday! I also remember being scared to death that someone was going to drop an atom bomb on us. We had bomb exercises in school where we had to go out into the halls, crouch down in front of out lockers with coats over our heads until an all clear siren was rung. At home we had to have black out shades in every room. When the siren sounded, all shades had to be pulled down, and lights turned off (yes, the did have electricity then), Eventually an all clear signal would go out and we could breathe again. But I also lived through the 50's (one of the greatest generations) And I even remember Elvis's first appearance on the Ed Sullivan show (as I look up at his pictures now)!


Further, you didn't answer why everything you write starts with "sorry about that"




1. I sense a very decent person with you Joan, and I respect you because you are older than me.
2. I have an adopted grandma who is 90 next May, she went through a helluva lot, she rode in a *Horse~N~Buggy* from Tennessee, to Texas when she was a little girl, with two other wagons, in the train.
3. She still remembers the trip, and settled in Glen Rose, Texas.
4. She is a National Treasure, now, in my opinion, a fantastic women.
5. I started using, *Sorry bout that* as an opening line years ago, on other debate sites, also my listing, is a carry over from other sites, just got used to it, like doing it and stuff, habit I suppose now.
6. You keep those boys of yours in-line, I don't doubt that for one minute!
7. They seem like some good and fair people, I think you did fantastic raising them, nice going!

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




You will never get warmed up, you're done, finished.

By all accounts and by all opinions i've soundly defeated you. There is nobody in your corner despite your claims of such or else they would come out and say so............unless you think everyone is stupid enough to believe ypu bullshit about the shadows.

I've beat the piss out of you, i've been independently declared winner.

Maybe we'll talk in the short time you have left here.



1. I do all right even not being warmed up.
2. So it really doesn't matter, I will still, *BLAST YOU IN DA GURTS* all the time!
3. You can declare anything you want, but I will still be here, *BLASTING YOU IN DER GUTS*!!!!:laugh2:


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

[shattered]

Opinion changed after being on staff for a while and receiving a constant barrage of pm's once i'd log on.

Nice try though. Your time here is running short.

Actually, your "opinion" on that only changed this last week or so.. :)

[5stringJeff]

Whatever purpose this thread may have once served has passed.