PDA

View Full Version : Clinton Denies Role in Gays-in-Military Debate Question



82Marine89
12-01-2007, 12:39 AM
Sen. Hillary Clinton was put on the defensive by questions linking her campaign to retired Brig Gen. Keith Kerr, whose question on gays in the military briefly electrified last night’s Republican debate. Following the CNN/YouTube debate, moderator Anderson Cooper announced that bloggers were claiming that Kerr served on Clinton’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender steering committee, and quickly apologized for including his question.

Clinton’s campaign hotly denied that the question, posed in a YouTube video, was a “plant” by the campaign. “We didn’t do this, we had nothing to do with this guy, he was acting on his own,” spokesman Phil Singer said in an interview. Singer said he expected questions about the incident from “right-wing bloggers,” but not from news outlets as worthy as this one.

“There’s nothing here,” he added.

Kerr said he didn’t ask the question on the Clinton campaign’s behalf in a CNN interview this morning. He said he had only lent his name to the campaign and hadn’t given it any money. “This was a private initiative,” he said of his question. Still, it was an unwelcome diversion for the New York senator and Democratic front-runner as she heads into the final weeks before the Iowa caucus.

Kerr asked on video why the candidates thought that “American men and women in uniform are not professional enough to serve with gays and lesbians.” After answers by Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, Kerr, who was in the audience, was handed a CNN microphone and invited to comment on their response.

“With all due respect, I did not get an answer from the candidates,” he said to applause. Sen. John McCain of Arizona then joined the debate, saying that military officers believe the current don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy is working, setting off some rancorous exchanges.

Minutes after the debate ended, Cooper announced that bloggers were emailing to tell them that Kerr has worked for the Clinton campaign. Singer confirmed that the general is part of a campaign advisory board, but said he isn’t “employed” by the campaign and wasn’t acting for the campaign last night.

LINK (http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/11/29/clinton-denies-role-in-gays-in-military-debate-question/)

avatar4321
12-01-2007, 09:05 AM
so the fact that her husband enacted the policy didnt atleast motivate the question?

KarlMarx
12-01-2007, 09:29 AM
This happened before. The Hillary Clinton campaign was caught using plants at another news conference. They said that they wouldn't let it happen again, so here we go again.

The usual excuse they give is that they didn't know anything about it. Well, you can believe it if you want, I don't.

Still, if you give Her Royal Slickness the benefit of the doubt. You still have to deal with the question that if she can't manage the people on her campaign, then how can you expect her to manage an Administration or lead a country?

Do us a favor Mrs Clinton, learn to tell the truth and divorce your husband (if he doesn't repent first), repent your sins and admit that you have been an arrogant power hungry, overly ambitious person who has been involved with illegal activity. Find Christ and turn over a new leaf. That may mean confessing to crimes and serving time in prison.

You won't hold any more positions of power, but your eternal soul will enjoy the blessings that only God and His Son Jesus can give.

Of course, the rest of us will have to find someone else to pick on (and when it comes to the Left, that will be an easy thing to do), but hey! We'll get over it! And saving your soul is well worth the trouble!

82Marine89
12-01-2007, 09:40 AM
Singer confirmed that the general is part of a campaign advisory board, but said he isn’t “employed” by the campaign and wasn’t acting for the campaign last night.

Back to what the definition if "is" is. Since he is technically not employed, she bears no responsibility.

What a load of crap.

Classact
12-01-2007, 10:21 AM
The question should be why did President Clinton bite his bottom lip and sign the "don't ask - don't tell" bill in the first place.

There is a Democratic majority in the House and Senate right now so why don't they represent the gay folks and end the policy of "don't ask - don't tell"?

After all they aren't doing anything else so why not enact legislation to remove the gay protocol of "don't ask - don't tell"?

Why, because they don't want to be blamed for the draft that will result of such action... that's why Clinton bit his bottom lip and signed the policy.