What resolution do you use?

[jimnyc]

What are your monitor settings set to?

[nevadamedic]

1024x768 I think.

[jimnyc]

I'm asking this because of signature settings. We are asking members to keep their signatures to no more than 5 lines - but this will appear differently depending on what your settings are. What may appear as 4 lines to someone with a resolution of 1600 might appear as 10 lines to someone with 800x600!

Just trying to find an 'average' of what the board might be using.

[darin]

1600x1200. 20" LCD

Also - folk jacking up their font sizes (if they are hard-of-seeing) can add lines.

[nevadamedic]

I'm asking this because of signature settings. We are asking members to keep their signatures to no more than 5 lines - but this will appear differently depending on what your settings are. What may appear as 4 lines to someone with a resolution of 1600 might appear as 10 lines to someone with 800x600!

Just trying to find an 'average' of what the board might be using.

I just wish we could go back to longer signatures.

[darin]

Never. :( Long sigs are lame. I've been on sites where sigs weren't kept in check - threads would become 20000 lines long, with only a few replies. :(

[retiredman]

1024x768 I think.

ditto

[remie]

ditto

same here

[5stringJeff]

1280 x 1024

[April15]

1280x1024

[manu1959]

what ever setting causes d's sig to fill my screen.........:poke:

[Pale Rider]

1280 X 1024

[darin]

Why don't you guys raise your resolution? Pale, I bet you could go 1600x1200. :)

[manu1959]

Why don't you guys raise your resolution? Pale, I bet you could go 1600x1200. :)

you conservatives are so intollerant of alternate lifestyle choices.....:cheers2:

[Mr. P]

you conservatives are so intollerant of alternate lifestyle choices.....:cheers2:

and so 'controlling'! :laugh2:

[hjmick]

At work I use 1280 x 1024, at home I run higher.

[darin]

you conservatives are so intollerant of alternate lifestyle choices.....:cheers2:

You spelled intolerant wrong.

AND...it's bout me encouraging you to have a BETTER life through higher resolution.

:D

[manu1959]

You spelled intolerant wrong.

AND...it's bout me encouraging you to have a BETTER life through higher resolution.

:D

i went to public school they didn't correct my spelling because they didn't want me to feel bad about myself.....

hater...........

[darin]

i went to public school they didn't correct my spelling because they didn't want me to feel bad about myself.....I want to be like you, Darrin

hater...........

You spelled my name wrong, but thanks though... :D

:poke::cheers2:

[Kathianne]

What are your monitor settings set to?

I had to look:

1280 x 800

Now I can vote! :laugh2:

[Kathianne]

I had to look:

1280 x 800

Now I can vote! :laugh2:

No I can't, mine isn't listed! :poke:

[Pale Rider]

Why don't you guys raise your resolution? Pale, I bet you could go 1600x1200. :)

1280 X 1024 is the highest resolution my video card will support, and my computer is only a year old. An HP Pavillion a1610n.

[Yurt]

Never. :( Long sigs are lame. I've been on sites where sigs weren't kept in check - threads would become 20000 lines long, with only a few replies. :(

thats a fact, long, fancy sigs bog load time, period. heck, even the mooslems know it, they now have a restriction on sigs too. soon, we may have WWW2 and with modern "channels" we can actually be looking at fancy, video laden or whatever sigs, instantly. but the time is not here.

btw, why do some get so uppity over sigs?

[Jon]

1920 X 1080 at home, 1280X1024 at work


You might be better off hard limiting line length and number of lines for signatures. If you limit sigs to maximum 100 characters per line, and maximum 5 lines, then signatures will always be the same vertical length on the board.

That is, unless 100 characters wraps on someone's 640X480 screen rez. :poke:

[Said1]

what ever setting causes d's sig to fill my screen.........:poke:

:lol: Me too.

[mrg666]

Why don't you guys raise your resolution? Pale, I bet you could go 1600x1200. :)

hey if you got bad eyes it's terrible , on too high a res

[Sitarro]

1600x1050 on my Apple 20'' and 1600x1024 on my Radius Press View 17'' SR......the highest either will allow me to use.:salute:

[Mr. P]

1600 x 1200.

[darin]

hey if you got bad eyes it's terrible , on too high a res

Just increase the size of the icons and text. :)

[glockmail]

1920 x 1200 on an Acer AL2416W. It works well for CADD.

[mrg666]

1920 x 1200 on an Acer AL2416W. It works well for CADD.

what do you design with cad glock , anything good

[glockmail]

what do you design with cad glock , anything good Mostly buildings and shit. And site work.