PDA

View Full Version : Mission Viejo Teacher Sued On Blasphemy Accusations



Psychoblues
12-18-2007, 08:53 PM
I can't believe this crap!!!!!!!

MISSION VIEJO, Calif. -- A Mission Viejo history teacher is being sued for making what a student calls anti-Christian comments.

Capistrano Valley High School sophomore Chad Farnan and his parents filed the lawsuit against James Corbett last week.

They allege that Corbett's remarks during an European history course promoted religious intolerance in violation of the First Amendment.

Court papers cite classroom tape recordings in which Corbett said, "When you put on your Jesus glasses, you can't see the truth," and other remarks that troubled Farnan.

Farnan says Corbett's lessons are one-sided, but the teacher's defenders say his remarks were taken out of context. Capistrano Valley junior Doug Kalagian says Corbett was being sarcastic "to help prove a point."

More: http://www.knbc.com/news/14867221/detail.html

Put on your Jesus glasses and read this. I don't think Jesus would approve.

actsnoblemartin
12-18-2007, 09:11 PM
psycho i love ya buddy, but your wrong on this one, let me explain why.

government officials are not allowed per the constitution to make biggoted rants against religion, this teacher didnt do it once, he did it every day.

hope your having a nice day

:salute:


I can't believe this crap!!!!!!!

MISSION VIEJO, Calif. -- A Mission Viejo history teacher is being sued for making what a student calls anti-Christian comments.

Capistrano Valley High School sophomore Chad Farnan and his parents filed the lawsuit against James Corbett last week.

They allege that Corbett's remarks during an European history course promoted religious intolerance in violation of the First Amendment.

Court papers cite classroom tape recordings in which Corbett said, "When you put on your Jesus glasses, you can't see the truth," and other remarks that troubled Farnan.

Farnan says Corbett's lessons are one-sided, but the teacher's defenders say his remarks were taken out of context. Capistrano Valley junior Doug Kalagian says Corbett was being sarcastic "to help prove a point."

More: http://www.knbc.com/news/14867221/detail.html

Put on your Jesus glasses and read this. I don't think Jesus would approve.

Psychoblues
12-18-2007, 09:19 PM
I'm having another GREAT DAY, martin, and you really need to read the post at least once more!!!!!!!!!

actsnoblemartin
12-18-2007, 09:23 PM
Really nice to hear from you :), sorry. Ill reread the post, and comment in a minute


I'm having another GREAT DAY, martin, and you really need to read the post at least once more!!!!!!!!!

Kathianne
12-18-2007, 09:34 PM
I can't believe this crap!!!!!!!

MISSION VIEJO, Calif. -- A Mission Viejo history teacher is being sued for making what a student calls anti-Christian comments.

Capistrano Valley High School sophomore Chad Farnan and his parents filed the lawsuit against James Corbett last week.

They allege that Corbett's remarks during an European history course promoted religious intolerance in violation of the First Amendment.

Court papers cite classroom tape recordings in which Corbett said, "When you put on your Jesus glasses, you can't see the truth," and other remarks that troubled Farnan.

Farnan says Corbett's lessons are one-sided, but the teacher's defenders say his remarks were taken out of context. Capistrano Valley junior Doug Kalagian says Corbett was being sarcastic "to help prove a point."

More: http://www.knbc.com/news/14867221/detail.html

Put on your Jesus glasses and read this. I don't think Jesus would approve.

I don't think Jesus or most folk would approve of this. Tell us Psycho, your take?

PostmodernProphet
12-18-2007, 10:10 PM
Capistrano Valley junior Doug Kalagian says Corbett was being sarcastic "to help prove a point."

which point was that.....that he was a bigot and an idiot?.....I would say he proved it rather well......

Psychoblues
12-26-2007, 11:48 PM
I stated my take.


I don't think Jesus or most folk would approve of this. Tell us Psycho, your take?

This is ridiculous.

Abbey Marie
12-27-2007, 12:46 PM
I stated my take.



This is ridiculous.

No, we are still waiting to hear which part of it you find ridiculous. Is it the teacher's bigoted and offensive comments, or is it the lawsuit?

Psychoblues
12-28-2007, 10:57 PM
Are you attacking me or the article, abby?



No, we are still waiting to hear which part of it you find ridiculous. Is it the teacher's bigoted and offensive comments, or is it the lawsuit?

You've attacked me before and as yuou know I can take it. Your repetition astounds me. lolololol

Gadget (fmr Marine)
12-28-2007, 11:14 PM
Reading this reminds me of how poorly I communicated with my EX wife. (Psycho playing the part of the EX....)

Communication is bi-directional.....and I am not getting all of what is going on with this "communique."

I think I will go back to sharpening Burnt Sienna, now.

Psychoblues
12-28-2007, 11:16 PM
I fully understand your problem, gadget.



Reading this reminds me of how poorly I communicated with my EX wife. (Psycho playing the part of the EX....)

Communication is bi-directional.....and I am not getting all of what is going on with this "communique."

I think I will go back to sharpening Burnt Sienna, now.

You have a way with words.

Gadget (fmr Marine)
12-28-2007, 11:20 PM
I fully understand your problem, gadget.

You have a way with words.

A problem, you say...with my words.....now that is a bit disquieting.

I'll be your Huckleberry.

Psychoblues
12-28-2007, 11:30 PM
Don't take it so personally, gadget.


A problem, you say...with my words.....now that is a bit disquieting.

I'll be your Huckleberry.

Huckleberries, dingleberries? What's the difference? Huckleberry Hound is still my fave in the reich wing lineup.

Abbey Marie
12-29-2007, 11:56 AM
Are you attacking me or the article, abby?




You've attacked me before and as yuou know I can take it. Your repetition astounds me. lolololol

Psycho, if I should ever attack you, you won't have to ask if I am doing it.

Now, back to the thread, and my previous question to you, if you can manage it. Which part of the article do you find ridiculous?

gabosaurus
12-29-2007, 01:29 PM
Psycho, you know I luv ya, but you have to respond to the questions. Remember, you are under oath here.

manu1959
12-29-2007, 03:17 PM
teaching religious opinion in a public school.....shame on this liberal paragon....

Psychoblues
12-31-2007, 01:20 AM
I swear,


Psycho, you know I luv ya, but you have to respond to the questions. Remember, you are under oath here.

You are more of an idiot than I ever imagined.

actsnoblemartin
12-31-2007, 01:35 AM
excellent point, she is a schmuck :beer:


I swear,



You are more of an idiot than I ever imagined.

Psychoblues
12-31-2007, 01:43 AM
Wait a minute, now martin!!!!!!!



excellent point, she is a schmuck :beer:

I never called her anything as serious as a "schmuck"?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

actsnoblemartin
12-31-2007, 01:46 AM
Fine, im calling her a schmuck.

sorry, i didnt mean to imply you called her schmuck, my apologies mate


Wait a minute, now martin!!!!!!!




I never called her anything as serious as a "schmuck"?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Psychoblues
01-02-2008, 12:39 AM
You're a fine one, martin!!!!!!!



Fine, im calling her a schmuck.

sorry, i didnt mean to imply you called her schmuck, my apologies mate

As far as the qurestion by her are concerned, I think they are all already answered in this thread and in others. It's all about attitude, or isn't it?

Thanks, martin.

actsnoblemartin
01-02-2008, 01:06 AM
well they say attitude is everything :)

so yeah, attitude is what its all about.


You're a fine one, martin!!!!!!!




As far as the qurestion by her are concerned, I think they are all already answered in this thread and in others. It's all about attitude, or isn't it?

Thanks, martin.

Psychoblues
01-02-2008, 01:20 AM
Who do you have in mind for the 2008 election, martin?



well they say attitude is everything :)

so yeah, attitude is what its all about.

Personally, I think Edwards has the correct attitude.

bullypulpit
01-02-2008, 10:44 AM
One person's blaspemy is another's joke.

Psychoblues
01-03-2008, 10:42 PM
I'm a generally humorous person, bully, but I missed the joke.



One person's blaspemy is another's joke.

Have you a more straight forward approach to this dilemma?

Comment in a minute? It's been a few days now and you ain't said shit about it.



Really nice to hear from you :), sorry. Ill reread the post, and comment in a minute

If you're scared, say you're scared.

bullypulpit
01-04-2008, 03:17 PM
I'm a generally humorous person, bully, but I missed the joke.




Have you a more straight forward approach to this dilemma?

Dog is God spelled backwards.

Psychoblues
01-05-2008, 08:44 PM
Kicking dogs just ain't my way of thinking, bully. Do you have anything understandable to say about the thread?



Dog is God spelled backwards.

And stop kicking my dog around!!!!!!! I have a foot of my own!!!! Want some of it?

bullypulpit
01-08-2008, 08:13 AM
Kicking dogs just ain't my way of thinking, bully. Do you have anything understandable to say about the thread?




And stop kicking my dog around!!!!!!! I have a foot of my own!!!! Want some of it?

When one adheres to religious doctrine, or any other doctrine for that matter, to the exclusion of any other point of view...even to the denial of reality...one is effectively blinded.

Psychoblues
01-17-2008, 09:48 PM
And with that "blindness" should there not come forth a desire for sight, or light, or something other than the affliction with which some might find in their lives?



When one adheres to religious doctrine, or any other doctrine for that matter, to the exclusion of any other point of view...even to the denial of reality...one is effectively blinded.

What is the old adage? You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink?