'State interest' argued in teaching homosexuality

[Gunny]

Uh, HELLLOOOO back at ya...you still haven't explained how adoption is allowing a homosexual to reproduce if the adopted kid turns out to be heterosexual. Last time I checked, reproducing requires passing something on to your progeny.

Probably becaause I didn't say adoption allows homosexuals to reproduce. It allows them to raise children.


I've claimed nothing of the sort, only that due to the demographics of the U.S., unless spaceships are dropping them out of the sky, the majority of homosexuals must come from heterosexual, Christian homes.

Whatever, dude. What keeps going over your head is that it is irrelevant. You are attempting to use a comparison when there is nothing to compare to. Homosexuals pretty-much had no choice but come from heterosexual households until the advent of artificial insemination and/or gay adoption and/or gay legal gay households. A legitimate comparison only begins by adding ALL demographs and using REAL numbers.

[Missileman]

I'd be interested in how you figure that majority statistic. The heterosexual part is sustainable, but not the Christian part, IMHO.

Every time the subject of morality comes up, all I ever hear is that the U.S. is 90% Christian...I've never researched it, but took it on face value. It seems a reasonable estimate to me. Maybe it's 90% Judeo-Christian and I need to reword my statement accordingly. That alteration has no affect on my point.

[CockySOB]

Every time the subject of morality comes up, all I ever hear is that the U.S. is 90% Christian...I've never researched it, but took it on face value. It seems a reasonable estimate to me. Maybe it's 90% Judeo-Christian and I need to reword my statement accordingly. That alteration has no affect on my point.

Ah. Based on that I can understand what you're getting at. No problem. Personally I'd figure the US demographic to be closer to maybe 80% Judeo-Christian, but like yourself, I haven't felt the need to research the exact numbers.

[Missileman]

Probably becaause I didn't say adoption allows homosexuals to reproduce. It allows them to raise children.

You didn't huh?

True homosexuals in nature die out without reproducing. Only Man circumvents this by allowing homosexuals to adopt children.

Whatever, dude. What keeps going over your head is that it is irrelevant. You are attempting to use a comparison when there is nothing to compare to. Homosexuals pretty-much had no choice but come from heterosexual households until the advent of artificial insemination and/or gay adoption and/or gay legal gay households. A legitimate comparison only begins by adding ALL demographs and using REAL numbers.[/COLOR]

And with all these homosexuals over the course of history coming from heterosexual homes, you still want to oppose my argument that environmental factors seems to be an unlikely, negligible at best, contributor to homosexuality?