Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867369

    Default Could Typo Rewrite Caucus History?

    So did Mitt really win Iowa? Or did Santorum?


    DES MOINES, Iowa -- Caucus night was chaotic in many places, with hundreds of voters, candidates showing up and the throngs of media who followed. The world's eyes were on Iowa. But in the quiet town of Moulton, Appanoose County, a caucus of 53 people may just blow up the results.

    Edward True, 28, of Moulton, said he helped count the votes and jotted the results down on a piece of paper to post to his Facebook page. He said when he checked to make sure the Republican Party of Iowa got the count right, he said he was shocked to find they hadn't.

    "When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I've got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa," True said. "Not Mitt Romney."

    True said at his 53-person caucus at the Garrett Memorial Library, Romney received two votes. According to the Iowa Republican Party's website, True's precinct cast 22 votes for Romney.

    "This is huge," True said. "It essentially changes who won."

    A spokeswoman with the Iowa Republican Party said True is not a precinct captain and he's not a county chairperson so he has no business talking about election results. She also said the party would not be giving interviews about possible discrepancies until the caucus vote is certified.

    Read more: http://www.kcci.com/news/30144582/de...#ixzz1ifQvb9Pi



    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,939
    Thanks (Given)
    4224
    Thanks (Received)
    4560
    Likes (Given)
    1427
    Likes (Received)
    1079
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    So did Mitt really win Iowa? Or did Santorum?
    Or does it really matter?

    Survey says no.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,002
    Thanks (Given)
    36
    Thanks (Received)
    209
    Likes (Given)
    20
    Likes (Received)
    101
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1187318

    Default

    are people who attend a caucus, Caucasians?......
    ...full immersion.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,939
    Thanks (Given)
    4224
    Thanks (Received)
    4560
    Likes (Given)
    1427
    Likes (Received)
    1079
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    In an Iowan Republican caucus? Like you don't already know the answer.
    "when socialism fails, blame capitalism and demand more socialism." - A friend
    "You know the difference between libs and right-wingers? Libs STFU when evidence refutes their false beliefs." - Another friend
    “Don't waste your time with explanations: people only hear what they want to hear.” - Paulo Coelho


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks (Given)
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    1501
    Likes (Given)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2067947

    Default

    The purpose of each caucus is to report accurately the number of votes.

    That is their ENTIRE purpose. They have no other.

    And they blew it? By an order of magnitude???

    I find this almost impossible to believe.

    Either it didn't happen, or it did and it wasn't an accident.
    "The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    San Dimas, California
    Posts
    2,025
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    236
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    703544

    Default

    They're overstating the significance of this. The reality of the early caucuses and primaries is to see who stays and who goes, who gets continued funding and who doesn't. That's why Santorum isn't making an issue of it. His unexpected strong finish in Iowa was a major victory in and of itself.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia, U.S.A.
    Posts
    14,035
    Thanks (Given)
    4822
    Thanks (Received)
    4655
    Likes (Given)
    2518
    Likes (Received)
    1576
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    3
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    14075391

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
    The purpose of each caucus is to report accurately the number of votes.

    That is their ENTIRE purpose. They have no other.

    And they blew it? By an order of magnitude???

    I find this almost impossible to believe.

    Either it didn't happen, or it did and it wasn't an accident.
    not sure why it's impossible to believe, but it is possible that it was an accident as well. without any other evidence it's hard to say what happened.
    But with a vote as close as "8" from a vote of 10s of thousands, seems to me you'd want to double check your numbers a few times BEFORE you go around calling anyone "the winner".
    just seems to make sense. the Idea that Romney is the Winner in Iowa doesn't make sense to me, by any reasonable standard he tied for 1st with Santorum. 8 or 22 votes difference in a statewide election is not a real win.
    It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties. The freeman of America did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise, and entangled the question in precedents. James Madison
    Live as free people, yet without employing your freedom as a pretext for wickedness; but live at all times as servants of God.
    1 Peter 2:16

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums