Contact these turncoats...

[stephanie]

Every slimy Democrat but two voted for this...17 Republicans voted with them, I put their contact information below...Let's tell them what we think....

In this image from television, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Ca., gavels the 246-182 vote approving a nonbinding measure, a symbolic rejection of President Bush's plan to deploy more troops to Iraq, Friday, Feb. 16, 2007, in Washington. AP Photo/vis CSPAN)




FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 99
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H CON RES 63 YEA-AND-NAY 16-Feb-2007 3:22 PM
QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution
BILL TITLE: Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq


Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican 17- 180- 4
Democratic 229- 2- 2
Independent
TOTALS 246 -182- 6


Here are the contacts for the 17 Republicans...
http://www.castle.house.gov/ DE
http://coble.house.gov/ NC 6th district
http://tomdavis.house.gov/ VA 11th district
http://www.house.gov/duncan/ TN 2nd district
http://www.house.gov/english/ PA 3rd
http://gilchrest.house.gov/ MD 1st
http://inglis.house.gov/ SC 4th
http://www.house.gov/timjohnson/ IL 15th
http://jones.house.gov/ NC 3rd
http://keller.house.gov/ FL 8th
http://www.house.gov/kirk/ IL 10th
http://www.house.gov/latourette/ OH 14th
http://www.house.gov/paul/ TX 14th
http://www.house.gov/petri/ WI 6th
http://www.house.gov/ramstad/ MN 3rd
http://www.house.gov/upton/ MI 6th
http://walsh.house.gov/ NY 25th


This is the contact for the two brave Democrats who stood up for the troops..
http://jimmarshall.house.gov/ D-GA 8
http://www.house.gov/genetaylor/ D-MS 4

[jillian]

Gee... you think they'll be getting more positive mail or more negative mail?

Thanks for the info.

[Hagbard Celine]

Every slimy Democrat but two voted for this...17 Republicans voted with them, I put their contact information below...Let's tell them what we think....

In this image from television, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Ca., gavels the 246-182 vote approving a nonbinding measure, a symbolic rejection of President Bush's plan to deploy more troops to Iraq, Friday, Feb. 16, 2007, in Washington. AP Photo/vis CSPAN)




FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 99
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H CON RES 63 YEA-AND-NAY 16-Feb-2007 3:22 PM
QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution
BILL TITLE: Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq


Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican 17- 180- 4
Democratic 229- 2- 2
Independent
TOTALS 246 -182- 6


Here are the contacts for the 17 Republicans...
http://www.castle.house.gov/ DE
http://coble.house.gov/ NC 6th district
http://tomdavis.house.gov/ VA 11th district
http://www.house.gov/duncan/ TN 2nd district
http://www.house.gov/english/ PA 3rd
http://gilchrest.house.gov/ MD 1st
http://inglis.house.gov/ SC 4th
http://www.house.gov/timjohnson/ IL 15th
http://jones.house.gov/ NC 3rd
http://keller.house.gov/ FL 8th
http://www.house.gov/kirk/ IL 10th
http://www.house.gov/latourette/ OH 14th
http://www.house.gov/paul/ TX 14th
http://www.house.gov/petri/ WI 6th
http://www.house.gov/ramstad/ MN 3rd
http://www.house.gov/upton/ MI 6th
http://walsh.house.gov/ NY 25th


This is the contact for the two brave Democrats who stood up for the troops..
http://jimmarshall.house.gov/ D-GA 8
http://www.house.gov/genetaylor/ D-MS 4

You do know that this resolution was a protest vote against sending more troops INTO Iraq right? I thought "supporting the troops" meant keeping them alive. I guess you guys have been using "support the troops" as a code for "send as many troops as possible into dangerous situations where they can get maimed and killed."

[stephanie]

You do know that this resolution was a protest vote against sending more troops INTO Iraq right? I thought "supporting the troops" meant keeping them alive. I guess you guys have been using "support the troops" as a code for "send as many troops as possible into dangerous situations where they can get maimed and killed."

[Gaffer]

You do know that this resolution was a protest vote against sending more troops INTO Iraq right? I thought "supporting the troops" meant keeping them alive. I guess you guys have been using "support the troops" as a code for "send as many troops as possible into dangerous situations where they can get maimed and killed."

Its just more attacks in the war on Bush. They are playing with soldiers lives to get their way. They are a dispicable bunch of traitors. They want to deny the troops the extra guns needed to finish the job. I hope the next major attack is on washington and right on top of their dumb asses. They deserve everything they get.

[Hagbard Celine]

Its just more attacks in the war on Bush. They are playing with soldiers lives to get their way. They are a dispicable bunch of traitors. They want to deny the troops the extra guns needed to finish the job. I hope the next major attack is on washington and right on top of their dumb asses. They deserve everything they get.

By "playing with soldiers' lives" do you mean "protesting the president's decision to send more US troops in to be killed?"

[avatar4321]

By "playing with soldiers' lives" do you mean "protesting the president's decision to send more US troops in to be killed?"

No. He means they are playing with soldier lives by telling the troop and our enemies that Congress is unwilling to stand behind them as they keep us safe from harm.

When are you Democrats going to realize your actions have real life consequences? We have Jack Murtha conspiring to cut funds from the troops in an effort to pull our troops out of Iraq.

NEWSFLASH: The war wont end if our troops our pulled out. If our troops are pulled out or underfunded just because Democrats want to make the President look bad, we are going to see murder and slaughter that we havent seen since the killing fields in southeast Asia. But then Democrats like pretending they werent responsible for that either.

[Hagbard Celine]

No. He means they are playing with soldier lives by telling the troop and our enemies that Congress is unwilling to stand behind them as they keep us safe from harm.

Seems to me a debate in congress is a normal thing. I don't know what country you live in, but here in the US the purpose of the congress is to debate issues. We don't have a bi-cameral legislature so that they can be a rubber stamp for the sitting president. It also seems to me that the troops aren't doing much to keep anybody "safe." Last I checked terrorism here in the US was handled by domestic law enforcement officials, not the troops policing Iraq.

When are you Democrats going to realize your actions have real life consequences? We have Jack Murtha conspiring to cut funds from the troops in an effort to pull our troops out of Iraq.

The last thing Murtha is going to do is cut the funding that keeps troops protected in the field. What you're spewing is a spun-up right-wing talking point that is simply not true.

NEWSFLASH: The war wont end if our troops our pulled out. If our troops are pulled out or underfunded just because Democrats want to make the President look bad,

Trust me, the President doesn't need the democrats' help in looking bad. His track record more than does that job for him.

we are going to see murder and slaughter that we havent seen since the killing fields in southeast Asia. But then Democrats like pretending they werent responsible for that either.

Ha, you mean like we saw in Darfur? The Republican-run Congress sure did a lot to alleviate those people's pain. Or how about the deaths of the poor and black right here in the good ol' US of A directly following the Katrina disaster. You could really tell that the Republican congress' hearts were bleeding for those people. Man, the deaths of innocent people is a mighty convenient card to pull when you need it isn't it Mr. Conservative?

[stephanie]

Seems to me a debate in congress is a normal thing. I don't know what country you live in, but here in the US the purpose of the congress is to debate issues. We don't have a bi-cameral legislature so that they can be a rubber stamp for the sitting president. It also seems to me that the troops aren't doing much to keep anybody "safe." Last I checked terrorism here in the US was handled by domestic law enforcement officials, not the troops policing Iraq.

The last thing Murtha is going to do is cut the funding that keeps troops protected in the field. What you're spewing is a spun-up right-wing talking point that is simply not true.

Trust me, the President doesn't need the democrats' help in looking bad. His track record more than does that job for him.

Ha, you mean like we saw in Darfur? The Republican-run Congress sure did a lot to alleviate those people's pain. Or how about the deaths of the poor and black right here in the good ol' US of A directly following the Katrina disaster. You could really tell that the Republican congress' hearts were bleeding for those people. Man, the deaths of innocent people is a mighty convenient card to pull when you need it isn't it Mr. Conservative?

[avatar4321]

I was thinking more...

[stephanie]

I was thinking more...

That's all I could post...

I couldn't post what I was REALLY thinking...

[Gaffer]

Seems to me a debate in congress is a normal thing. I don't know what country you live in, but here in the US the purpose of the congress is to debate issues. We don't have a bi-cameral legislature so that they can be a rubber stamp for the sitting president. It also seems to me that the troops aren't doing much to keep anybody "safe." Last I checked terrorism here in the US was handled by domestic law enforcement officials, not the troops policing Iraq.

We are not talking about a debate in congress, we are talking about congress attempting to take power from the president and using the military and troops lives to do that. The troops are fighting al quada and iranian thugs in iraq. The same ones that want to come here and kill us after they take over the middle east. The same ones congress wants to give the battle plans too. We are not fighting terrorism, we are fighting islam. And the dems want to sell out this country to islam for their own gain.

[/QUOTE]The last thing Murtha is going to do is cut the funding that keeps troops protected in the field. What you're spewing is a spun-up right-wing talking point that is simply not true.[/QUOTE]

That's exactly what murtha wants to do. murtha is a piece of shit. He is doing everything in his power to undermine the military.

[/QUOTE]Trust me, the President doesn't need the democrats' help in looking bad. His track record more than does that job for him.[/QUOTE]

No he doesn't he does enough stupid shit on his own


[/QUOTE] Ha, you mean like we saw in Darfur? The Republican-run Congress sure did a lot to alleviate those people's pain. Or how about the deaths of the poor and black right here in the good ol' US of A directly following the Katrina disaster. You could really tell that the Republican congress' hearts were bleeding for those people. Man, the deaths of innocent people is a mighty convenient card to pull when you need it isn't it Mr. Conservative? [/QUOTE]

And what is being done in darfur now. That's a un run operation and the Us hasn't had much say in it. But the dems LOVE the un. How about deaths every day anywhere. You going to blame them on Bush too. Katrina was a disaster all right, nagan REALLY screwed things up and that stupid governor did even worse. But lets blame the republicans. It's the dem way, point the finger and blame someone else.

[stephanie]

This Is The Worst Democrat Congress.......EVER

Their selling out our Country.......For POWER

[Merlin]

You do know that this resolution was a protest vote against sending more troops INTO Iraq right? I thought "supporting the troops" meant keeping them alive. I guess you guys have been using "support the troops" as a code for "send as many troops as possible into dangerous situations where they can get maimed and killed."

I don't know if you have ever been over there or not, but I wish you were over there now. I would love to see you write then about how you wouldn't want Congress to send you any help. If you want to murder someone, why don't you just get your gun and do it like a man????

[OCA]

Despite what Congress thinks the president is going ahead bravely in the face of a media smear campaign and sending the troops.

God bless President Bush.