Contact these turncoats...

[nevadamedic]

If you want to really show your support for our Troops and their efforts goto www.wewintheylose.com after you write those creeps who go along with Pelosi and her delusions.

[Doniston]

Every slimy Democrat but two voted for this...17 Republicans voted with them, I put their contact information below...Let's tell them what we think....

In this image from television, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Ca., gavels the 246-182 vote approving a nonbinding measure, a symbolic rejection of President Bush's plan to deploy more troops to Iraq, Friday, Feb. 16, 2007, in Washington. AP Photo/vis CSPAN)




FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 99
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

H CON RES 63 YEA-AND-NAY 16-Feb-2007 3:22 PM
QUESTION: On Agreeing to the Resolution
BILL TITLE: Disapproving of the decision of the President announced on January 10, 2007, to deploy more than 20,000 additional United States combat troops to Iraq


Yeas Nays PRES NV
Republican 17- 180- 4
Democratic 229- 2- 2
Independent
TOTALS 246 -182- 6


Here are the contacts for the 17 Republicans...
http://www.castle.house.gov/ DE
http://coble.house.gov/ NC 6th district
http://tomdavis.house.gov/ VA 11th district
http://www.house.gov/duncan/ TN 2nd district
http://www.house.gov/english/ PA 3rd
http://gilchrest.house.gov/ MD 1st
http://inglis.house.gov/ SC 4th
http://www.house.gov/timjohnson/ IL 15th
http://jones.house.gov/ NC 3rd
http://keller.house.gov/ FL 8th
http://www.house.gov/kirk/ IL 10th
http://www.house.gov/latourette/ OH 14th
http://www.house.gov/paul/ TX 14th
http://www.house.gov/petri/ WI 6th
http://www.house.gov/ramstad/ MN 3rd
http://www.house.gov/upton/ MI 6th
http://walsh.house.gov/ NY 25th


This is the contact for the two brave Democrats who stood up for the troops..
http://jimmarshall.house.gov/ D-GA 8
http://www.house.gov/genetaylor/ D-MS 4

why do you consider them turncoats? Is everyone who disagrees with you point of veiw a turmcoat?

EDITED: Since this have been moved to the steel cage, I will make no further comment on the thread.

[shattered]

why do you consider them turncoats? Is everyone who disagrees with you point of veiw a turmcoat?

EDITED: Since this have been moved to the steel cage, I will make no further comment on the thread.

Where did she say *that*? Man, yer dumber than a brick. You couldn't take a 2 year old "to task".

[LuvRPgrl]

You do know that this resolution was a protest vote against sending more troops INTO Iraq right? I thought "supporting the troops" meant keeping them alive. I guess you guys have been using "support the troops" as a code for "send as many troops as possible into dangerous situations where they can get maimed and killed."

I know this is a bit old, its in the hottest threads list, so I thought it was current at first.

But think about it, our fine liberal idiot here thinks that supporting the troops means keeping them alive is foremost.

Heck, with that as a priority, we might as well just disband the military altogether and we will be 100% effective.

Interesting how these libs always have to put words in our mouths to try and make us look wrong or bad, or they have to make some false presumption, like, if you support the troops, then you must think keeping them alive is the ultimate imperative.

These bafoons are still looking for a spin that will allow them to oppose the troops yet somehow make it sound like they are actually supporting the troops.

I think they should expand it to, we support our law enforcement, we just dont support giving them guns, cars, or the ability to search suspects until after they are shot.