Yea, according to the kook left - try Clinton IncOriginally Posted by truthmatters
Senior Member
Yea, according to the kook left - try Clinton Inc
Marine turned Soldier
Only Bush and the pubbies can do that.
POLITICAL ACTIVISTS CREED
"It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brushfires in people's minds" -Samuel Adams
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men
stand ready to do violence on their behalf."~George Orwell
Senior Member
Yet libs keep telling us how Bush is an idiot. For an "idiot" he was able to steal 3 elections and fool the Dems into voting for the Iraq warOnly Bush and the pubbies can do that.
Senior Member
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0503/S00470.htm
Exit polls until the last decade have been pretty acruate.
Senior Member
and is that Bush's fault as well?
Libertas Super Omnia
A very weak indicator.
Liberty is the greatest measure of equality.
Economic Left/Right: 9.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Sola Scriptura | Soli Deo Gloria | Solo Christo | Sola Gratia | Sola Fide
Senior Member
Bush himself said that the exit polls in the Urikrane were an obvious sign of fraud in 2004.
Senior Member
and what does that have to do with the NH vote?
Senior Member
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Nov21.html
We paid for the exit polls in the Ukraine and Bush was concerned that they election was invalid because of the exit polls were off.
Senior Member
Again, what the hell does this have to do with the election in NH?
Senior Member
Exit polls have always been an indicator of fraud and even Bush agreed.
Senior Member
Not in the US
Only Dems whine about fraud when they lose elections. Yet it is mostly Dems who are convicted of voting fraud
Senior Member
so what explains the hand counts in New hampshire going for Obamma and the machine counts going for Hillary?
You do know the guy who owns the company NH bought them from is in jail on drug charges right?
Senior Member
So now the kook left is turning on Hillary - this is to good to be true
Hell, a Hilary staffer is in jail for DWI. Does that mean Hillary is to blame for that as well?
Senior Member
http://www.legitgov.org/nh_machine_vs_paper.html
If he broke the law he should be in jail.
Hillary does not control the machine software.
Someone wanted the Rs to face Hillary instead of Obama.
2008 New Hampshire Democratic Primary Results --Total Democratic Votes: 287,580 - Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Hillary Clinton, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 40.121%
Clinton, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 34.703%
Barack Obama, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 35.756%
Obama, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 38.785%
Machine vs Hand:
Clinton: 5.419% (15,584 votes)
Obama: -3.029% (-8,711 votes)
2008 New Hampshire Republican Primary Results --Total Republican Votes: 238,909 Machine vs Hand (RonRox.com) 09 Jan 2008
Mitt Romney, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 33.044%
Romney, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 25.536%
Ron Paul, Diebold Accuvote optical scan: 7.233%
Paul, Hand Counted Paper Ballots: 9.235%
Machine vs Hand:
Romney: 7.509% (17,939 votes)
Paul: -2.112% (-4,781 votes)
The numbers you report in "Where Paper Prevailed, Different Results" (1/9/08) certainly merit further investigation. The next step would be to get standard deviations and do a simple difference of means test. This would tell the probability that these results could have occurred by chance. --CLG reader Brian D'Agostino, Ph.D., New York, NY
The difference between results from hand-counting and machine-counting do not necessarily signify that the machine-counting is wrong. Other factors may be involved. For example, voting machines may have been used in wealthier, more moderate neighborhoods. There may not be a causal connection between machine-counted ballots and differing totals. One cannot assume that machines are necessarily wrong while hand-counting is necessarily right. --Michael Rectenwald
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote