Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Green card soldiers Families torn by citizenship for fallen

    Real long article full a personal testimonials at the link. Pretty interesting read.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080324/...id3bNN2fdvzwcF

    A young, ambitious immigrant from Guatemala who dreamed of becoming an architect. A Nigerian medic. A soldier from China who boasted he would one day become an American general. An Indian native whose headstone displays the first Khanda, emblem of the Sikh faith, to appear in Arlington National Cemetery.

    These were among more than 100 foreign-born members of the U.S. military who earned American citizenship by dying in Iraq.
    There are tens of thousands of foreign-born members in the U.S. armed forces. Many have been naturalized, but more than 20,000 are not U.S. citizens.

    "Green card soldiers," they are often called, and early in the war, Bush signed an executive order making them eligible to apply for citizenship as soon as they enlist. Previously, legal residents in the military had to wait three years.

    Since Bush's order, nearly 37,000 soldiers have been naturalized. And 109 who lost their lives have been granted posthumous citizenship.

    They are buried with purple hearts and other decorations, and their names are engraved on tombstones in Arlington as well as in Mexico and India and Guatemala.
    Others question whether non-citizens should even be permitted to serve. Mark Krikorian of the conservative Center for Immigration Studies, argues that defending America should be the job of Americans, not non-citizens whose loyalty might be suspect. In granting special benefits, including fast-track citizenship, Krikorian says, there is a danger that soldiering will eventually become yet another job that Americans won't do.

    And yet, immigrants have always fought — and died — in America's wars.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,989
    Thanks (Given)
    34386
    Thanks (Received)
    26498
    Likes (Given)
    2389
    Likes (Received)
    10014
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    Real long article full a personal testimonials at the link. Pretty interesting read.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080324/...id3bNN2fdvzwcF
    So what's your point? Military service has been a means to US citizenship since forever.

    It's no different than those that join for the educational benefits. You take the man's money and benefits, you do the man's job, peacetime or war. The US military isn't just a peactime handout program. It's primary business is to conduct war. That's the risk involved in taking the man's money and benefits.

    Don't like the risk? Don't join.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    I'm fine with the idea of letting forigners serve in the military but they out to be allowed to take the citizenship test right then and there. Americans should fight for America, they should be made new Americans for serving.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    san antonio
    Posts
    3,310
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9177

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    I'm fine with the idea of letting forigners serve in the military but they out to be allowed to take the citizenship test right then and there. Americans should fight for America, they should be made new Americans for serving.
    What are you talking about? Bush's order made them all citizens....
    PRAIRIE FIRE by William Ayers: Obama's guide to destory America
    "Maybe I missed that part of the Constitution"--Joe Steel
    You can't spell Liberals without Lies.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    So he has, good.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,989
    Thanks (Given)
    34386
    Thanks (Received)
    26498
    Likes (Given)
    2389
    Likes (Received)
    10014
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    I'm fine with the idea of letting forigners serve in the military but they out to be allowed to take the citizenship test right then and there. Americans should fight for America, they should be made new Americans for serving.
    No they shouldn't. Since when is paying for the job before it's done good business? Never.

    They earn American citizenship after a specified period of honorable service, just like you get paid at the end fo the week AFTER you perform the work.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,989
    Thanks (Given)
    34386
    Thanks (Received)
    26498
    Likes (Given)
    2389
    Likes (Received)
    10014
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theHawk View Post
    What are you talking about? Bush's order made them all citizens....

    What order is THAT? Got a link?
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    No they shouldn't. Since when is paying for the job before it's done good business? Never.

    They earn American citizenship after a specified period of honorable service, just like you get paid at the end fo the week AFTER you perform the work.
    Off course there should be the ability to revoke it if they do not complete their term of service for a valid reason but I'd still say let them go for it as soon as they join and start serving. A military full of hired foreign guns with no loyalties to the US thru citizenship is not a good thing.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,989
    Thanks (Given)
    34386
    Thanks (Received)
    26498
    Likes (Given)
    2389
    Likes (Received)
    10014
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    Off course there should be the ability to revoke it if they do not complete their term of service for a valid reason but I'd still say let them go for it as soon as they join and start serving. A military full of hired foreign guns with no loyalties to the US thru citizenship is not a good thing.
    Be for real. This is the US with its bleeding heart, liberal US courts. Revokation would never happen.

    And there is no hiring of "foreign guns" with no loyalties to the US through citizenship since citizenship IS the enticement. It ain't like the pay and chow is good.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums