Stats Show Earth Is Cooling Not Warming

[red states rule]

So much for the global warming hysteria and false theories that try to explain a natural occurance


Critic cites stats -- Earth cooling down, not warming up
Pete Chagnon - OneNewsNow - 2/25/2008 10:30:00 AM

A prominent global-warming critic says many scientists believe that this winter's weather could point to a future cooling trend.

Marc Morano is the resident authority on global warming with the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works minority staff. He says according to records kept by the United Nations, global average temperatures peaked during the El Nino year of 1998 -- and that since 2001, the temperature trend has declined slightly.

According to Morano, despite the continued pumping of CO2 into the atmosphere, the southern hemisphere has also experienced a cooling trend; and in the northern hemisphere, January 2008, by some estimates, was the coldest month in more than a decade.

"Solar scientists are worried about the lows," he says. "They're calling it the 'disturbingly quiet solar cycle.' And we're faced with again just a lack of years ... of temperatures just sort of 'plateau-ing out' to the point where the head of the U.N. IPCC [Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change] has recently called for an investigation as to why temperatures were not continuing to rise as predicted."

Morano also notes that between 1940 and 1975, the earth's temperature cooled even though CO2 levels rose. And global warming alarmists, he notes, have failed to explain the lack of a correlation between rising CO2 and rising temperatures, a theory that Al Gore promotes in his movie An Inconvenient Truth.

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/D....aspx?id=68277

[Hobbit]

Get with the times, RSR, it's not 'global warming' any more. It's 'global climate change.' Didn't you know that the Earth is like a thermostat? If the temperature changes at all, it's because you did something wrong.

[red states rule]

Get with the times, RSR, it's not 'global warming' any more. It's 'global climate change.' Didn't you know that the Earth is like a thermostat? If the temperature changes at all, it's because you did something wrong.

I am sorry. I can't keep up with the libs changing the details of the crisis

In HS a lib SS teacher held up the Newsweek on global cooling

Then about 15 years later it was called global warming

Now, as you point out, it is climate change

I do love it when snow cancels the Global Warming hearings in DC

[TheStripey1]

I am sorry. I can't keep up with the libs changing the details of the crisis

In HS a lib SS teacher held up the Newsweek on global cooling

Then about 15 years later it was called global warming

Now, as you point out, it is climate change

I do love it when snow cancels the Global Warming hearings in DC

maybe you haven't heard... considering where you keep your head, it is totally understandable... but the Pentagon has plans to deal with Global Climate Change...

heard about it?

Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us

Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters..

A secret report, suppressed by US defence chiefs and obtained by The Observer, warns that major European cities will be sunk beneath rising seas as Britain is plunged into a 'Siberian' climate by 2020. Nuclear conflict, mega-droughts, famine and widespread rioting will erupt across the world.

The document predicts that abrupt climate change could bring the planet to the edge of anarchy as countries develop a nuclear threat to defend and secure dwindling food, water and energy supplies. The threat to global stability vastly eclipses that of terrorism, say the few experts privy to its contents.

'Disruption and conflict will be endemic features of life,' concludes the Pentagon analysis. 'Once again, warfare would define human life.'

The findings will prove humiliating to the Bush administration, which has repeatedly denied that climate change even exists. Experts said that they will also make unsettling reading for a President who has insisted national defence is a priority.

...snip

so tell me, rsr, are those folks at the pentagon all liberals?

[TheStripey1]

different source:

Storm over Pentagon climate scenario
Consultants present worst-case view: warming, then sudden cooling

[TheStripey1]

maybe you don't like msnbc... how about Fortune?

The Pentagon's Weather Nightmare The climate could change radically, and fast. That would be the mother of all national security issues.

[red states rule]

Tell me more about global warming. It is Spring and we have this weather update

To bad the waeather is not living up to the hysteria of the global warming nuts


UPDATED: Snow will start abruptly and hard
Duluth News Tribune
Published Thursday, April 10, 2008

Snow is expected to start abruptly and hard in the Twin Ports by about 8 p.m. tonight with up to 15 inches on the ground by the time snow ends early Saturday.

Higher amounts, up to 20 inches and more, are possible in the higher elevations around Lake Superior.

A broad area of central Minnesota and Northwestern Wisconsin will see up to a foot of new snow that will continue on into the Upper Peninsula.

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/art...07d5504377f281

[TheStripey1]

Maybe you haven't heard considering where you keep your head, but Chuck Hagel is a republican...

Bill ties climate to national security
Seeks assessments by CIA, Pentagon


By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff | April 9, 2007

WASHINGTON -- The CIA and Pentagon would for the first time be required to assess the national security implications of climate change under proposed legislation intended to elevate global warming to a national defense issue.

The bipartisan proposal, which its sponsors expect to pass the Congress with wide support, calls for the director of national intelligence to conduct the first-ever "national intelligence estimate" on global warming.

The effort would include pinpointing the regions at highest risk of humanitarian suffering and assessing the likelihood of wars erupting over diminishing water and other resources.

The measure also would order the Pentagon to undertake a series of war games to determine how global climate change could affect US security, including "direct physical threats to the United States posed by extreme weather events such as hurricanes."

The growing attention to global warming as a national security issue could open new avenues of support for tougher efforts to limit greenhouse gases, according to specialists.

"If you get the intelligence community to apply some of its analytic capabilities to this issue, it could be compelling to whoever is sitting in the White House," said Anne Harrington , director of the committee on international security at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington. "If the White House does not absorb the independent scientific expertise, then maybe something from the intelligence community might have more weight."

The measure, sponsored by Senator Chuck Hagel , a Nebraska Republican, and Senator Richard J. Durbin , an Illinois Democrat, comes as other international bodies are taking steps to designate global warming as a high international priority

...snip

Is Senator Hagel a liberal too? or are you just fixated on liberals? Why do you hate liberals? Jesus was a liberal... do you hate him too?

[red states rule]

Chucky is a RINO and he is wrong on this issue as well

Global warming is a hoax and a scam

[TheStripey1]

I ask you this question from time to time but you have never once answered it...

You say Global Climate Change is a natural occurance... so... How many people died last time it happened due to the rising seas? How many were displaced? How many cities had to relocate? How many died because of the famines caused by failed crops? How many died in the wars that ensued due to the changing environment? Hmmm, rsr? How many?

What we need to do is figure out how to cope with the coming disasters... or we could do what you do... keep our heads up our asses... is that YOUR plan, rsr?

[red states rule]

I ask you this question from time to time but you have never once answered it...

You say Global Climate Change is a natural occurance... so... How many people died last time it happened due to the rising seas? How many were displaced? How many cities had to relocate? How many died because of the famines caused by failed crops? How many died in the wars that ensued due to the changing environment? Hmmm, rsr? How many?

What we need to do is figure out how to cope with the coming disasters... or we could do what you do... keep our heads up our asses... is that YOUR plan, rsr?

The only disaster is having to listen to the global wamring nuts as they spread their hysteria in the face of evidence that proves them wrong

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com...ast-12-months/

If there is such a huge "crisis" why do the ones who rant the most about global warming do not change their lifestyle and energy consumption?

http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com...ast-12-months/

[red states rule]

Al Gore at his best

[April15]

Considering that the polar ice is melting faster than in recorded history I can see a cooling of the earth. That the levels of the oceans has risen I am even more convinced because of all the extra water the earth has to cool off!

[red states rule]

Considering that the polar ice is melting faster than in recorded history I can see a cooling of the earth. That the levels of the oceans has risen I am even more convinced because of all the extra water the earth has to cool off!

I am so sorry to bust your bubble, but.............


September 15, 2007
Expanding ice caps...
John Hinderaker:

You've no doubt read about the shrinking ice cap at the North Pole, and the plight of the polar bears there. It's less likely that you've heard that in the meantime, the ice cap at the South Pole has been expanding, and just recently reached its largest extent since measurements began in 1979.

I compared Google News searches for "ice cap 'north pole'" and "ice cap 'south pole.'" The North Pole stories were all about the shrinking ice cap there as evidence of global warming. I couldn't find a single news story about the expanding ice cap at the South Pole. This strikes me as a pretty good illustration of how the conventional story line about Earth's climate drives news reporting...

Neither North nor South Poles are definitive evidence in themselves. Climate change would not be linear. But this is sure powerful evidence of what a bunch of frauds our news-media are.

The whole globo-warming debate is warped because a LOT of things are not being mentioned. Things that would cause the little people—you and me— to possibly fail to reach the conclusions deemed appropriate by our elite would-be masters. For instance, 99% of the Greenhouse Effect on Earth is caused by water vapor. And lucky we are that it is; we'd be pretty cold without it. We'd all be living in the "Antarctic."

http://www.randomjottings.net/archives/003023.html

[manu1959]

Considering that the polar ice is melting faster than in recorded history I can see a cooling of the earth. That the levels of the oceans has risen I am even more convinced because of all the extra water the earth has to cool off!

they cancelled the opening baby harp seal clubbing this year because the ice was too thick.....