All this outrage the libs are showing proves they have something to hide. Since day one of the war, the appeasers have made iit clear they have no spin. They have now iwll to fight. They have no thirst for victory
If Barry, Hillary, and the Dems would channel their hate and anger to the terrorists instead of Pres Bush - the terrorists would be running away and surrendering
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Hey, RSR, Fox News has a banner up that Obama is making another speech right now (12:30 5/16) against Bush calling him an appeaser!!!
So this is big.
Obama is also wearing a flag pin today and is starting a [Christian] "faith initiative" in Kentucky to say he's not really a Muslim.
The kind of "Christian" his church is seems indistinguishable from the Black Muslims they strongly support there, however.
Apparently Obama's campaign has decided they have to defend against all this stuff being thrown at them.
Defend himself from what?
According to the Obama people, we can't talk about his middle name, his trrrorist frind Ayers, his indicted buddy Resko, his wife when she bellows how she has never been proud about her country, his voting record, his racist pastor, Barry's racist remarks in his book, or his lack of wearing a flag pin and putting his hand over his heart during the National Anthem
Given the rules the Obama people want, I hope he is making a very long speech
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
I am sure that Hanoi John McCain has a chance.
This is from Peggy Noonan's latest column:
Big picture, May 2008:
The Democrats aren't the ones falling apart, the Republicans are. The Democrats can see daylight ahead. For all their fractious fighting, they're finally resolving their central drama. Hillary Clinton will leave, and Barack Obama will deliver a stirring acceptance speech. Then hand-to-hand in the general, where they see their guy triumphing. You see it when you talk to them: They're busy being born.
The Republicans? Busy dying. The brightest of them see no immediate light. They're frozen, not like a deer in the headlights but a deer in the darkness, his ears stiff at the sound. Crunch. Twig. Hunting party.
Obama will not only be another DuKakis - he will be another McGovern
Could Obama Be Another Dukakis?
By Susan Estrich
It is a thought that sends shivers down the backs of Democrats, a name that brings to mind memories of an election lost that might have been won, against a war hero once referred to in headlines as a "wimp" who won not so much by his own strengths but because of the skill of his operatives in painting his lesser-known opponent as an out of touch "liberal" who refused to salute the flag or admit his mistakes, not to mention his supposedly unpatriotic wife.
Could Obama be another Dukakis?
It isn't just die-hard Clinton supporters who are pointing out the similarities. Even some Obama backers who believe that the nomination fight is over see the possible parallels, and are determined to avoid them, or at least try.
I was there. Mike Dukakis was (and is) a friend of mine. And so I can say that, while the danger is certainly worth recognizing, Barack Obama is no Mike Dukakis. Or at least he doesn't have to be.
There is no question that the Republicans will try to do to Obama what they did to Dukakis: paint him as a liberal, out of touch with the values of average (white) Americans, so far left that he has left America.
for the complete article
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...r_dukakis.html
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
More from Peggy Noonan:
Republicans = toastThe Bush White House, faced with the series of losses from 2005 through '08, has long claimed the problem is Republicans on the Hill and running for office. They have scandals, bad personalities, don't stand for anything. That's why Republicans are losing: because they're losers.
All true enough!
But this week a House Republican said publicly what many say privately, that there is another truth. "Members and pundits . . . fail to understand the deep seated antipathy toward the president, the war, gas prices, the economy, foreclosures," said Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia in a 20-page memo to House GOP leaders.
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan
Red States: Polls don't mean jack shit at this point. Mondale was up by 17 points over Reagan at this point.
Obama has not even gotten his campaign against McCain in gear yet.
Here's what you should be concerned about....
In every Democratic primary contest so far, Obama has gained momentum and either built on his lead, or cut way down on Hillary's lead, or overtaken Hillary and passed her.
When this guy has time to campaign, when he gets out there and people get to know him, they like him.
Here's another thing you should be concerned about....
If Obama gets John Edwards on the ticket with him, they will be a very formidable combination.
Before you respond with your usual Rush Limbaugh-like bluster, stop and think.....
And if an idea should pop into your head, treat it kindly. It will be in a strange place and it may be afraid.....
How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.
Ronald Reagan