Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    9,768
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    28
    Likes (Given)
    2
    Likes (Received)
    16
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    515526

    Default Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits

    http://www.independent.co.uk/life-st...ts-842478.html

    Threat of world Aids pandemic among heterosexuals is over, report admits

    A 25-year health campaign was misplaced outside the continent of Africa. But the disease still kills more than all wars and conflicts

    By Jeremy Laurance
    Sunday, 8 June 2008

    A quarter of a century after the outbreak of Aids, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has accepted that the threat of a global heterosexual pandemic has disappeared.

    In the first official admission that the universal prevention strategy promoted by the major Aids organisations may have been misdirected, Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids said there will be no generalised epidemic of Aids in the heterosexual population outside Africa.

    Dr De Cock, an epidemiologist who has spent much of his career leading the battle against the disease, said understanding of the threat posed by the virus had changed. Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.

    Dr De Cock said: "It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in other countries. Ten years ago a lot of people were saying there would be a generalised epidemic in Asia – China was the big worry with its huge population. That doesn't look likely. But we have to be careful. As an epidemiologist it is better to describe what we can measure. There could be small outbreaks in some areas."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,597
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1963

    Default

    Now we can get ready for the influenza pandemic.
    "Unbloodybreakable" DCI Gene Hunt, 2008

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    The Deep,Deep South
    Posts
    4,006
    Thanks (Given)
    2
    Thanks (Received)
    4
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    44440

    Default

    These idiots are just figuring out that this is a disease spread by homosexuals and needle users, what a surprise. I guess gay men will have to go back to purposely infecting straight females in order to get the funding back.
    No matter where I've traveled or how great the trip was, it's always wonderful to return to my country, The United States of America......... me

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31137

    Default

    I think the rest of the world figured this out about 15 years ago.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by actsnoblemartin View Post
    [url] ....Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids ....
    Quote Originally Posted by actsnoblemartin View Post
    [url] ....Kevin de Cock, the head of the WHO's department of HIV/Aids ....
    This one's up there with the Dr. Bone the orthopedist and Dr. Clapp the gynecologist.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Tell that to a large part of Africa. It ain't the gay drug addicts there for sure. One whole continent is a large part of "the world".
    Last edited by LiberalNation; 06-08-2008 at 06:56 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,271
    Thanks (Given)
    22
    Thanks (Received)
    272
    Likes (Given)
    73
    Likes (Received)
    347
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    554230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    Tell that to a large part of Africa. It ain't the gay drug addicts there for sure. One whole continent is a large part of "the world".
    Yeah, that was addressed;

    Whereas once it was seen as a risk to populations everywhere, it was now recognised that, outside sub-Saharan Africa, it was confined to high-risk groups including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers and their clients.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    That's good news. Bad disease that we are lucky has been largly confined to high risk groups in the west so far. I wouldn't call the threat over tho, it's not over till there is a cure. It could still spread into the wider population.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    can i just ask (while i have the opportunity) why is it high risk between 2 men, but not high risk between a man and a woman? surly the risks are the same aslong as there is penetrative sex, and it wwould spread faster among the hetro population as there are far more hetro persons having sex than homo/bisexuals
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    True but if it's limited to a group of gays and those gays aren't screwing a lot of promiscuous women it would tend to stay in that group I’d think. Any sex between someone hiv positive would hafta be somewhat high risk.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Noir View Post
    can i just ask (while i have the opportunity) why is it high risk between 2 men, but not high risk between a man and a woman? surly the risks are the same aslong as there is penetrative sex, and it wwould spread faster among the hetro population as there are far more hetro persons having sex than homo/bisexuals
    Anal sex babe- it's not normal, moral, natural or healthy, so it breeds disease.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Doesn't sound too pleasent but whatever floats peoples boats. It's no more immoral or abnormal then plenty of other sex.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Anal Intercourse Disease Syndrome. Proof that its not normal, moral, natural or healthy.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    prove that it's not. Mora;, normal, natural, all subjective and determined by the time and society you live in.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    12,358
    Mentioned
    79 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4760245

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    Anal sex babe- it's not normal, moral, natural or healthy, so it breeds disease.
    So you are more likely to spread aid through anal sex than vaginal (sp?) sex?
    If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums