Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default My Take on Flooding and Levees

    As a civil and environmental engineer I think that levees should be built to a 2 or maybe five year storm height and no more. That's analogous to the natural berm that rivers deposit along their banks. Floodplains should be used for crops and not much else. Frequent flooding nourishes the soil with sediments, and prevents them from moving further downstream, like what is happening now at the end of the Mississippi, the largest "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico ever observed by man. Upstream flooding minimizes downstream flooding.

    Whenever we mimic nature we are usually correct. When public health officials settled on a concentration of fluoride to put in the public water supply, they used the percentage that occurred naturally in sea water. That turned out to be beneficial, inexpensive and caused no harm.

    The medical profession has the Hippocratic Oath, which states: “first, do no harm”. The engineering and public policy professions should abide by the same oath.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    7,727
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    8
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    243661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    As a civil and environmental engineer I think that levees should be built to a 2 or maybe five year storm height and no more. That's analogous to the natural berm that rivers deposit along their banks. Floodplains should be used for crops and not much else. Frequent flooding nourishes the soil with sediments, and prevents them from moving further downstream, like what is happening now at the end of the Mississippi, the largest "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico ever observed by man. Upstream flooding minimizes downstream flooding.

    Whenever we mimic nature we are usually correct. When public health officials settled on a concentration of fluoride to put in the public water supply, they used the percentage that occurred naturally in sea water. That turned out to be beneficial, inexpensive and caused no harm.

    The medical profession has the Hippocratic Oath, which states: “first, do no harm”. The engineering and public policy professions should abide by the same oath.
    I agree but I'm afraid man is far too egotistical to let nature "win" . We are determined to figure it all out and rule over it. We will undoubtably lose.

    A nutcase will do nutty things.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums