Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 49
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Let's ignore the fascism/socialist aspect of this for a moment.

    What exactly does Obama expect this group of volunteers to do? I still dont know what our military can't do national security wise.
    If we were as industrious to become good as to make ourselves great, we should become really great by being good, and the number of valuable men would be much increased; but it is a grand mistake to think of being great without goodness; and i pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous." - Ben Franklin

    Imagine what good we can do if we all joined together, united as followers of Christ - M. Russell Ballard

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by avatar4321 View Post
    Let's ignore the fascism/socialist aspect of this for a moment.

    What exactly does Obama expect this group of volunteers to do? I still dont know what our military can't do national security wise.

    I guess they could spy on everybody; the post office people refused to do that when Homeland Security floated the idea, so get the kids to spy.

    It was done formally in both the Soviet Union early on, and famously in Nazi Germany, kids rewarded by the regime for turning in their parents for forbidden types of talk at home.

    I'm kidding in a way, I really expect this stupid idea to die in the campaign. Bush floated the same nonsense after 9/11 in a SOTU address, but it went nowhere.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mundame View Post
    I guess they could spy on everybody; the post office people refused to do that when Homeland Security floated the idea, so get the kids to spy.

    It was done formally in both the Soviet Union early on, and famously in Nazi Germany, kids rewarded by the regime for turning in their parents for forbidden types of talk at home.

    I'm kidding in a way, I really expect this stupid idea to die in the campaign. Bush floated the same nonsense after 9/11 in a SOTU address, but it went nowhere.
    Our government already does such a wonderful job of spying on its own citizens.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    But that's not his belief. You just made it up.
    We don't know what Obama's beliefs are. They change from day to day.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    7,396
    Thanks (Given)
    11
    Thanks (Received)
    1501
    Likes (Given)
    5
    Likes (Received)
    47
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2067947

    Default

    You have to wonder: What is Obama's reason for wanting a new force (as he called it) like this, as large and well-funded as the present U.S. Army? Just another way to direct government largesse to people not presently getting it, in exchange for their votes in November?

    What exactly does he intend these people to do?
    "The social contract exists so that everyone doesn’t have to squat in the dust holding a spear to protect his woman and his meat all day every day. It does not exist so that the government can take your spear, your meat, and your woman because it knows better what to do with them." - Instapundit.com

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
    What is Obama's reason for wanting a new force (as he called it) like this, as large and well-funded as the present U.S. Army? Just another way to direct government largesse to people not presently getting it, in exchange for their votes in November?
    I like it, Acorn: I bet you are right. We need to watch out for that.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    9,002
    Thanks (Given)
    36
    Thanks (Received)
    209
    Likes (Given)
    20
    Likes (Received)
    101
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1187318

    Default

    my daughter's private school has required service participation for years now.....ten hours per year for underclassmen, twenty hours for seniors......no graduation without proof of participation......
    ...full immersion.....

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    my daughter's private school has required service participation for years now.....ten hours per year for underclassmen, twenty hours for seniors......no graduation without proof of participation......
    That's the difference between public and private schools though. You signed your kids up for school knowing the requirements up front.

    Obama is threatening to withhold gov. funding. Big difference.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trigg View Post
    That's the difference between public and private schools though. You signed your kids up for school knowing the requirements up front.

    Obama is threatening to withhold gov. funding. Big difference.

    We had to do 40 hours in my high school during our junior year. It was definitely a worthwhile experience. I hated it at the time but I think it helped me grow up a little quicker.

    If a law like this gets passed, they need to realize that a lot of private schools and indeed churches require service already. Had I not gone to a private school, my church would have required me to do about the same amount of service to get confirmed anyway.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    If a law like this gets passed, they need to realize that a lot of private schools and indeed churches require service already. Had I not gone to a private school, my church would have required me to do about the same amount of service to get confirmed anyway.

    What service were you expected to do from your church?

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    We had to do 40 hours in my high school during our junior year. It was definitely a worthwhile experience. I hated it at the time but I think it helped me grow up a little quicker.

    If a law like this gets passed, they need to realize that a lot of private schools and indeed churches require service already. Had I not gone to a private school, my church would have required me to do about the same amount of service to get confirmed anyway.
    My problem with this is the disenfranchisement of the poor.

    Obama wants to threaten people with no federal funding for schools. Inner city schools are the ones that are going to suffer. The parents can't afford to ferry their children to and from volunteer programs.

    Libs argue until they're blue in the face about requiring ID to vote and then Obama proposes something like this????? Our low income students would be refused funding for their schools and no diploma on top of that. What a nice guy.

    For the record you can't com pair private school requirements to public.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trigg View Post
    My problem with this is the disenfranchisement of the poor.

    Obama wants to threaten people with no federal funding for schools. Inner city schools are the ones that are going to suffer. The parents can't afford to ferry their children to and from volunteer programs.
    So have volunteer programs that utilize school transportation. Maybe we shouldn't expect poor kids to go to school at all, since it puts such a burden on their family to have to go do stuff.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,800
    Thanks (Given)
    29
    Thanks (Received)
    199
    Likes (Given)
    107
    Likes (Received)
    99
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1284556

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    So have volunteer programs that utilize school transportation. Maybe we shouldn't expect poor kids to go to school at all, since it puts such a burden on their family to have to go do stuff.

    I like it. Let's do exactly that: people only go to school whose family WANTS them to and can force them to go and to behave well enough to stay in.

    Hard rules, real discipline, if they act like thugs they get suspended or expelled. Don't want to go? Good, lettuce-picking is 800 miles thataway.

    And you KNOW we need lettuce-pickers.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    The great white north
    Posts
    5,718
    Thanks (Given)
    455
    Thanks (Received)
    1144
    Likes (Given)
    11
    Likes (Received)
    19
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2334308

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SpidermanTUba View Post
    So have volunteer programs that utilize school transportation. Maybe we shouldn't expect poor kids to go to school at all, since it puts such a burden on their family to have to go do stuff.
    Why do you hate the poor? Arn't you a dem?

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans 7th ward
    Posts
    1,125
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mundame View Post
    I like it. Let's do exactly that: people only go to school whose family WANTS them to and can force them to go and to behave well enough to stay in.

    Hard rules, real discipline, if they act like thugs they get suspended or expelled. Don't want to go? Good, lettuce-picking is 800 miles thataway.

    And you KNOW we need lettuce-pickers.
    Plus, they should only be allowed to go if their parents have enough money to pay for it.

    I'm personally against any sort of system that seeks to provide opportunity to those with bad parents. I think any kid with bad parents should just be sold into slavery.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums