Tillman Investigation Hampered by "near universal lack of recall"

[Psychoblues]

Marteen, you posted within my post and didn't include anything to indicate your overwriting. Go back to your post here, #8 I think, and reread it. I think you'll catch it. If you continue to have a prob I'll give additional instruction, my friend.

im really lost here. can you just tell me your point, cause i cant tell if your kidding or insulting here, and id rather give u the benefit of the doubt and let you explain to me what you meant, and let me have another try at that question

Tonight is getting too annoying

I meant nothing arbitrary or disconcerting in my remarks, marteen.

[actsnoblemartin]

Thank you my dear friend, i always give you the benefit of the doubt, cause your kind to me

Marteen, you posted within my post and didn't include anything to indicate your overwriting. Go back to your post here, #8 I think, and reread it. I think you'll catch it. If you continue to have a prob I'll give additional instruction, my friend.





I meant nothing arbitrary or disconcerting in my remarks, marteen.

[Psychoblues]

You are very welcome, marteen my friend.

Thank you my dear friend, i always give you the benefit of the doubt, cause your kind to me

Some of these jerks just love to see you chasing your tail, don't cha know?

[emmett]

Martin, you really need to get a life son. Sitting around in the middle of the day having a conversation with David about nothing is not the way I want you to live.

We have got to find you a girlfriend.

[April15]

Don't change dicks in the middle of a screw
Vote Nixon in 72.

[theHawk]

As usual, I smell an even bigger coverup than we already know about!!!!!!!! But, this is not surprising from a conservative administration, is it? Going all the way back to tricky dicky, R. Reagan (Iran/Contra), etc. the modem operandi is always "I don't know". As was the case in Watergate we'll have to depend on honest and competent journalism to get to the real truth of what happened.

Tillman was killed by friendly fire, period. Is the White House somehow responisble for that particular incident? Are they trying to cover up when they learned it could of been friendly fire? Are they not supposed to just let the Army conduct their investigation? Or are they supposed to micro-manage every situation and investigation?

[gabosaurus]

We should let the Army investigate something that they tried to cover up earlier?

[theHawk]

We should let the Army investigate something that they tried to cover up earlier?

Yes, the Army is perfectly capable of policing its own. Maybe a few officers tried to hide things. The JAG or whatever the Army equivlant is, its meant to find out any wrong doing within the Army.

[gabosaurus]

Whenever the military hierarchy does an "investigation" of itself, it always comes out the same: Bullshit in, bullshit out.

[theHawk]

Whenever the military hierarchy does an "investigation" of itself, it always comes out the same: Bullshit in, bullshit out.

You do realize that the Abu Ghraib story was first broke by the Army doing its own investigation right?

[Psychoblues]

That's not true, hawk. The Washington Times sat on that story for months waiting for the Army tro break it so they could contribute. The Army kept dragging their feet so the Washington Times sold it to the Washington Post and they broke it. The army, as usual, didn't know how to handle the bad news.

You do realize that the Abu Ghraib story was first broke by the Army doing its own investigation right?