Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Walter Reed Privatized By Halliburton Subsidiary

    It all comes home. In a casket, a gurney or in a basket.


    The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has subpoenaed Maj. Gen. George Weightman, who was fired as head of Walter Reed Army Medical Center, after Army officials refused to allow him to testify before the committee Monday.

    Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and subcommittee Chairman John Tierney asked Weightman to testify about an internal memo that showed privatization of services at Walter Reed could put "patient care services... at risk of mission failure." ...

    The memorandum "describes how the Army's decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was causing an exodus of 'highly skilled and experienced personnel,'" the committee's letter states. "According to multiple sources, the decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed led to a precipitous drop in support personnel at Walter Reed."

    The letter said Walter Reed also awarded a five-year, $120-million contract to IAP Worldwide Services, which is run by Al Neffgen, a former senior Halliburton official.

    They also found that more than 300 federal employees providing facilities management services at Walter Reed had drooped to fewer than 60 by Feb. 3, 2007, the day before IAP took over facilities management. IAP replaced the remaining 60 employees with only 50 private workers.


    More: ARMY TIMES!!! http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/Weightmansubpoena

    I can’t even think in the light of this revelation and statement of FACT!!!!!!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    572
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12121

    Default

    Psycho posts:

    I can’t even think in the light of this revelation and statement of FACT!!!!!!!!
    __________________

    Finally, something we agree on.






























    I'm sorry, I was talking about the part where you can't think.
    If ya can't prove it, don't say it.
    Bikes, babes, and beer, it don't get no better than that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,853
    Thanks (Given)
    960
    Thanks (Received)
    3749
    Likes (Given)
    535
    Likes (Received)
    854
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17759693

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trobinett View Post
    Psycho posts:


    __________________

    Finally, something we agree on.






























    I'm sorry, I was talking about the part where you can't think.
    Some people try to think and nothing happens...Psycho is one of them.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Look, csm, you and trobby can condemn me all you want. The other facts are that neither of you have commented on the facts as presented in the article. You have, however, attacked me apparently because I posted the article and apparently you don't agree with it for whatever reason or you simply don't want to hear it. Either way, you indicate your intelligence by your own posts, not mine.

    Quote Originally Posted by CSM View Post
    Some people try to think and nothing happens...Psycho is one of them.
    Sorry sarge, you ain't makin' much sense to me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,979
    Thanks (Given)
    34370
    Thanks (Received)
    26486
    Likes (Given)
    2386
    Likes (Received)
    10007
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    It all comes home. In a casket, a gurney or in a basket.


    The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has subpoenaed Maj. Gen. George Weightman, who was fired as head of Walter Reed Army Medical Center, after Army officials refused to allow him to testify before the committee Monday.

    Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and subcommittee Chairman John Tierney asked Weightman to testify about an internal memo that showed privatization of services at Walter Reed could put "patient care services... at risk of mission failure." ...

    The memorandum "describes how the Army's decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was causing an exodus of 'highly skilled and experienced personnel,'" the committee's letter states. "According to multiple sources, the decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed led to a precipitous drop in support personnel at Walter Reed."

    The letter said Walter Reed also awarded a five-year, $120-million contract to IAP Worldwide Services, which is run by Al Neffgen, a former senior Halliburton official.

    They also found that more than 300 federal employees providing facilities management services at Walter Reed had drooped to fewer than 60 by Feb. 3, 2007, the day before IAP took over facilities management. IAP replaced the remaining 60 employees with only 50 private workers.


    More: ARMY TIMES!!! http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/Weightmansubpoena

    I can’t even think in the light of this revelation and statement of FACT!!!!!!!!
    Let us review:

    The memorandum "describes how the Army's decision to privatize support services at Walter Reed Army Medical Center was causing an exodus of 'highly skilled and experienced personnel,'" the committee's letter states.
    Highly skilled? Where did they keep THESE GUYS hidden?
    The letter said Walter Reed also awarded a five-year, $120-million contract to IAP Worldwide Services, which is run by Al Neffgen, a former senior Halliburton official.
    This statement does not support the allegation in the thread title; which, is blatant misrepresentation in an attempt to sensationalize.
    I can’t even think in the light of this revelation and statement of FACT!!!!!!!!
    More attempted senasationalism. I see nothing worthy of such a response.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Unfreakinbelievable!!!!!!!!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    Let us review:
    Highly skilled? Where did they keep THESE GUYS hidden?
    This statement does not support the allegation in the thread title; which, is blatant misrepresentation in an attempt to sensationalize.
    More attempted senasationalism. I see nothing worthy of such a response.
    Read it again and think about the good 'ol boys makin' all that easy dough while you read, gunny.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,979
    Thanks (Given)
    34370
    Thanks (Received)
    26486
    Likes (Given)
    2386
    Likes (Received)
    10007
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Psychoblues View Post
    Unfreakinbelievable!!!!!!!!!!



    Read it again and think about the good 'ol boys makin' all that easy dough while you read, gunny.
    I already read it. A former Haliburton employee does not a Haliburton subsidiary make. "Haliburton" is just one of those liberal buzzwords that gets y'all headlines; whether or not there is any legitimacy to the accusations.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    Now Halliburton can profit from the injured as well as the dead. How convenient.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    725
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    231

    Default

    Does anybody have any evidence that all this privatization has benefitted the injured troops?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,979
    Thanks (Given)
    34370
    Thanks (Received)
    26486
    Likes (Given)
    2386
    Likes (Received)
    10007
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Now Halliburton can profit from the injured as well as the dead. How convenient.
    Yeah ... ignore the fact Haliburton has nothing to do with it in favor of making yet another stupid and baseless accusation.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,979
    Thanks (Given)
    34370
    Thanks (Received)
    26486
    Likes (Given)
    2386
    Likes (Received)
    10007
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdzeye View Post
    Does anybody have any evidence that all this privatization has benefitted the injured troops?
    The privatization of support/non-primary military jobs has been going on since the cutbacks that started in the late 80s. It hasn't benefitted the military, to include injured troops.

    It's like stretching a rubber band. Sooner or later it's going to break.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    12,504
    Thanks (Given)
    6
    Thanks (Received)
    210
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    565784

    Default

    Privitizing? Good. Private sector always runs better and more efficiently then government run anything.

    Just remember how bad government has run this health care facility. Liberals want the government to run health care for the entire country. They can't handle a military hospital and they want to extend that to cover everyone.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

    Default

    If the Bushies keep our troops over in Iraq for long enough, they won't have to deal with as many coming back. Which is probably the primary objective.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    "Halliburton" is no "liberal buzzword", dipstick. Halliburton has been around for many years, been shown extraordinary favoritism by the Reagan, both Bushes and even the Clinton administrations and you reduce them to "liberal buzzword"?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I already read it. A former Haliburton employee does not a Haliburton subsidiary make. "Haliburton" is just one of those liberal buzzwords that gets y'all headlines; whether or not there is any legitimacy to the accusations.
    Talk to the regular employees of most any power generating entity, industrial refurbishment operation or commercial construction business associated with governmental contracting and they will all tell you that Halliburton is Poison with a capital P. That is outside the political infrastructure of the Republican Party. Excepting them (the pukes that support Halliburton) their reputation for inferior work, union busting and contract exploitation is well known.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums