Scholar: 'Jesus Tomb' makers mistaken

[glockmail]

Sorry to burst your pseudo-scientific bubble, but ALL matter expands when heated and contracts when cooled. Water is unique in that it expands when heated or frozen. That water behaves in this unique manner is hardly evidence of design or creation.

Of course it is evidence, just evidence that you dismiss.

[Missileman]

Of course it is evidence, just evidence that you dismiss.

It's only evidence that water behaves differently, nothing more, nothing less. That you assign it some mystic meaning is of no consequence. You seem to be as poorly versed in science as you are in debate.

[glockmail]

It's only evidence that water behaves differently, nothing more, nothing less. That you assign it some mystic meaning is of no consequence. You seem to be as poorly versed in science as you are in debate.

As you have reverted to insults it appears that you have lost the debate.

[Missileman]

As you have reverted to insults it appears that you have lost the debate.

It wasn't an insult, but an observation. The fact that you feel insulted means it must have been an accurate observation.

[glockmail]

It wasn't an insult, but an observation. The fact that you feel insulted means it must have been an accurate observation.

There was nothing accurate about it. That is why I consider it insulting. Perhaps you could explain in a scientific manner why water behaves in this unique way.

[Missileman]

There was nothing accurate about it. That is why I consider it insulting. Perhaps you could explain in a scientific manner why water behaves in this unique way.

Perhaps you might explain how a self-proclaimed design engineer would be unfamiliar with the expansion and contraction of metal that makes expansion joints necessary.

[glockmail]

Perhaps you might explain how a self-proclaimed design engineer would be unfamiliar with the expansion and contraction of metal that makes expansion joints necessary.

Irrelevant.

[Missileman]

Irrelevant.

Hardly! You implied the expansion and contraction of matter is rare and that it's evidence of design. In order for your arguments to be credible, they should at the very least be based in fact. Since your appraisal of the rarity of the expansion and contraction of matter was flawed, it renders the rest of your "water is designed" argument invalid.

[glockmail]

Hardly! You implied the expansion and contraction of matter is rare and that it's evidence of design. In order for your arguments to be credible, they should at the very least be based in fact. Since your appraisal of the rarity of the expansion and contraction of matter was flawed, it renders the rest of your "water is designed" argument invalid.

Irrelevant. Steel is not used in structures in liquid form, turning to solid, thereby allowing fish to live in lakes of molten steel.

I really don't see where you are going with this.