Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 91 to 92 of 92
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,799
    Thanks (Given)
    34
    Thanks (Received)
    59
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    835969

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joe Steel View Post
    Technically, yes. What she's doing probably isn't unlawful.

    As a matter of fact, though, she's no more traveling, and thus eligible for the per diem, than other government workers who live the same distance or farther from their normal workplace. She's taking unfair advantage of the multiple offices available to the governor.
    How many people do you know who commute daily 850 miles each way?

    BTW...there's another way to put "probably isn't unlawful". It's called "perfectly legal". If she wasn't eligible to receive per diem and claimed and received it, it would be an entirely different matter.

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Not a single one of you jerks addressed my original post as to maybe it was due to her "State Church" business that the payment vouchers were filed!!!!!!!!

    You're all such idiots for self imposed ignorance!!!!!!!!!!!!


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums