Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    8,256
    Thanks (Given)
    951
    Thanks (Received)
    3923
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    4457674

    Default Irena Sendler -VS- Al Gore

    Gore can't hold a candle to this. never will


    [YOUTUBE]OVw1PANUcdg[/YOUTUBE]

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    that award is no longer relevant, solely political
    Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. ~Zen Buddhist Proverb

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burlingame,California
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    What I find curious is that the nominated names are not made public until 50 years after they are considered. So how did this name get released? It is a lie. She was not up for consideration but used to make Gore look, and the Nobel people too, bad. Only fools got sucked into it.
    A chance for a new beginning, like a dawn of reconciliation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by April15 View Post
    What I find curious is that the nominated names are not made public until 50 years after they are considered. So how did this name get released? It is a lie. She was not up for consideration but used to make Gore look, and the Nobel people too, bad. Only fools got sucked into it.
    1. did not know about the 50 years

    2. if true, how was she "used", if true, do you support gore getting the nobel over her?
    Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. ~Zen Buddhist Proverb

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Burlingame,California
    Posts
    2,642
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yurt View Post
    1. did not know about the 50 years

    2. if true, how was she "used", if true, do you support gore getting the nobel over her?
    I do not believe the Nobel people would be so dumb as to pick anyone over her! If she indeed was nominated. But we will have to wait a long time to find out that answer.
    A chance for a new beginning, like a dawn of reconciliation.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,363
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by April15 View Post
    I do not believe the Nobel people would be so dumb as to pick anyone over her! If she indeed was nominated. But we will have to wait a long time to find out that answer.
    do you have a link for that btw?
    Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. ~Zen Buddhist Proverb

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums