Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    In a house
    Posts
    1,690
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7239

    Default

    There was a link on the MSN homepage about gays today but it has been removed... I tried to google it with "msn gays military 8 jan. 09" and you can't get the original link or the blog try the google and look at the original link... Obama better bite his bottom lip real hard before he announces to rethink that idea kinda like Clinton did.
    "The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers."
    ---Thomas Jefferson (or as Al Sharpton calls him: Grandpappy)

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16,760
    Thanks (Given)
    94
    Thanks (Received)
    1751
    Likes (Given)
    7
    Likes (Received)
    165
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    13
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9306080

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    not until it happens. doen't it hafta get thru congress. You'd be suprised how many dems would side with repubs on this one.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    5,457
    Thanks (Given)
    14
    Thanks (Received)
    714
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    7
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1515011

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AFbombloader View Post
    The people whoe were polled (from the military) do not want the policy changed, 58%. And the paper I read yesterday said that 25%-30% said they would seperate/not reenlist if the policy is changed. That should say something. Doesn't the voice of the people who have to live and work in the environment we are discussing mean something?

    AF
    not in the case of depriving liberty to an entire subsection of the country. Remember, the same was said when they went to let in Women, as well as Blacks. And again, they're already in, so what's the big difference?

    as to the people that are going to bag out just because of gays/lesbians being allowed in, they do not having any understanding of Honor, Courage, or Commitment.
    "Government screws up everything. If government says black, you can bet it's white. If government says sit still for your safety, you'd better run for your life!"
    --Wayne Allyn Root
    www.rootforamerica.com
    www.FairTax.org

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Queers in the military?!?!?!??!?!? And fat ones to boot?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!



    Psychoblues

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums