Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kathianne View Post
    Because there is no way that the federal government is given the enumerated powers to deal with pets. Now if the states want to and their citizens agree, go for it. Seems more a city or country/parish concern IMO.
    Jeff said "The government", without specifying Federal or State. Anyway, the federal govenrment is involvdd in a gazillion other things no so enumerated. Why would anyone focus on this problem in particular?
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,569
    Thanks (Given)
    470
    Thanks (Received)
    532
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    10
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1486130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Jeff said "The government", without specifying Federal or State. Anyway, the federal government is involved in a gazillion other things no so enumerated. Why would anyone focus on this problem in particular?
    You do have a point. they do after all mandate "endangered species" and the like all the time. That comes from the federal level.

    Personally I think it should be a local municipality issue, not a federal one. If an area is being overrun with unwanted dogs and cats that is their issue to take care of. Why should I living in another area that has intelligent and respectful people who spay/neuter their animals and keep an eye on them have to pay for others inattentiveness???
    Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want." -Dr. Randy Pausch


    Death is lighter than a feather, Duty is heavier than a mountain

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Jeff said "The government", without specifying Federal or State. Anyway, the federal govenrment is involvdd in a gazillion other things no so enumerated. Why would anyone focus on this problem in particular?
    IMO, they shouldn't be. That is one of the things I thought we 'conservatives' were fighting against.

    Seriously, in the past few days I've become depressed, reading about all the things folks want the government to include in any 'bailout' schemes, including those on the right.

    I'm for getting back to the fed doing what was assigned to them, by the constitution. If states or lesser governmental entities want to get to dealing with individuals minutia, more power to them in holding office.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  4. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    in an economic situation the feds are the only ones big enough to do anything about it.

    You may have a pension working in the school system but could you imagine the old folks freezing to death right now without social security.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    in an economic situation the feds are the only ones big enough to do anything about it.

    You may have a pension working in the school system but could you imagine the old folks freezing to death right now without social security.
    Do about what LN? Smoking, pets, bailouts, gay marriage, reparations?


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  6. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    feds doing stuff not authorized in the constitution.....

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Newnan, GA
    Posts
    6,236
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31137

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    Jeff said "The government", without specifying Federal or State. Anyway, the federal govenrment is involvdd in a gazillion other things no so enumerated. Why would anyone focus on this problem in particular?
    To clarify: the federal government is not given the power to fund animal shelters. The federal government could certainly pass laws against animal cruelty, though.
    State and local governments certainly may choose to support the ASPCA with funding; however, I think it's an unwise use of funds.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    I have no problem with it being state or local vs. federally funded. However, I would hate to see us go back to the bad old days of starving animals wandering the streets, or animal abuse going unpunished because of lack of funds.

    I would hope that no one would be able to see that and be ok with it. Compassion for all beings is really not that hard, is it? Especially for those, like children and animals, who have no choice.
    Last edited by Abbey Marie; 01-31-2009 at 04:56 PM.
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,659
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3016

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    I have no problem with it being a state or local vs. federally funded. However, I would hate to see us go back to the bad old days of starving animals wandering the streets, or animal abuse going unpunished becasue of lack of funds.
    It's not like animal abuse is really strongly punished now (unless you're an NFL quarterback). If you ever watch Animal Police on Animal Planet (I wouldn't recommend it, but I had a roommate who used to watch it), you see abuse cases where the state that the animals are in is just nauseating, and the owner gets a $200 fine or something like that. It makes me sick. I know this is the bleeding-heart liberal in me coming out, but animal abuse cases make me more sick than human-on-human violence, by a mile.
    Last edited by dan; 01-31-2009 at 04:57 PM.
    Free the West Memphis 3.... http://www.wm3.org

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    In my knickers
    Posts
    31,029
    Thanks (Given)
    13927
    Thanks (Received)
    15358
    Likes (Given)
    4384
    Likes (Received)
    5487
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dan View Post
    It's not like animal abuse is really strongly punished now (unless you're an NFL quarterback). If you ever watch Animal Police on Animal Planet (I wouldn't recommend it, but I had a roommate who used to watch it), you see abuse cases where the state that the animals are in is just nauseating, and the owner gets a $200 fine or something like that.
    Like many crimes, the percentage of convictions is probably low. I agree that the fines should be higher. But it is still important to have the laws and to enforce them as much as you can. There must be some level of deterrence. People are sick.
    After the game, the king and the pawn go into the same box - Author unknown

    “Unfortunately, the truth is now whatever the media say it is”
    -Abbey

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,603
    Thanks (Given)
    23850
    Thanks (Received)
    17373
    Likes (Given)
    9628
    Likes (Received)
    6080
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5stringJeff View Post
    To clarify: the federal government is not given the power to fund animal shelters. The federal government could certainly pass laws against animal cruelty, though.
    State and local governments certainly may choose to support the ASPCA with funding; however, I think it's an unwise use of funds.
    Agreed. I give money to my local shelter, I've done so over 20 years. Do not think the government on any level should be subsidizing. There are animal lovers galore in US that will give.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Deep South
    Posts
    10,639
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ASPCA is an excellent organization IMHO, Kat. Until recently my little Mississippi town just shot and killed feral or stray cats and dogs, not to mention the coons, possums, skunks, etc. ASPCA came into town and now we have a no-kill shelter supported by most of our community organizations and general population. The ASPCA even helped us get a local vet to agree to services at low or no cost and I feel much better now about how we handle the problem of yet unwanted animals and our abilities to find wanting and adequate homes for them. ASPCA is a modern day miracle for us!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Cosmos?!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!



    Psychoblues

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    The governement should have a stronger hand on encouraging people to get their pets neutered!

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    At the house
    Posts
    2,979
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    31884

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -Cp View Post
    This seems like a HUGE waste of tax dollars... Our Tax Dollars? REALLY?

    http://www.aspca.org/
    Left unchecked, stray animals can be destructive, a nuisance and a danger to our families, especially our children.

    My only problem is when government agencies become too intrusive into our personal lives, like most seem to do.
    Only You Can Save Your Childrens Future!

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cumberland Plateau in TN
    Posts
    996
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Abbey View Post
    I'd especially like to see no-kill shelters get more money.
    Do you know about Nathan Winograds "no kill advocacy" movement?

    Animals should always survive the rescue and killing is wrong! Spay/neuter
    saves lives through prevention.
    What are reparations? Making me pay
    for something I had nothing to do with compensates no one
    who suffered an injustice therefore I would be penalized for
    something I didnt do and someone else would receive a settlement
    for an injury they did not suffer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums