You didn't answer my question. If kids are indeed NOT being prevented from praying by the lack of a designated moment of silence, why is this designated moment required? I'd like to hear a legitimate reason why a religious practice (ceremony?) should be included in the public school schedule if it has no impact on kid's ability to pray silently while in school.
Here in Australia it's arguably as much a "Christian" population as the States, but they don't mix politics and religion anywhere near as much. People seem to realize that religion is a personal matter and that you can't force your religion on other people, especially not through politics. I must say it's much better that way. People can't agree on religion or politics, mixing them is like a speedball. Only an addict would think it's a good thing.
Pork, good for you, bad for Muslims and Jews.
So, if there is some other document out there outside of the Bible that establishes certain behaviors as wrong, then you won't say its religion pushing its morals on everyone else?
Is the Bible the only document in the world that condemns homosexuality? If not, then how could you say an anti-homosexual stance on issues is an example of pushing religion on others?
PRAIRIE FIRE by William Ayers: Obama's guide to destory America
"Maybe I missed that part of the Constitution"--Joe Steel
You can't spell Liberals without Lies.
[QUOTE=theHawk;33882]So, if there is some other document out there outside of the Bible that establishes certain behaviors as wrong, then you won't say its religion pushing its morals on everyone else?
There are, for the most part, universally accepted laws against murder, theft of another's property, perjury, etc. The prohibition of these offenses is not unique to any religion or society. There are however lots of blue laws still on the books that were put in place to do nothing other than push morals.
Where did I say this?
Liberty is the greatest measure of equality.
Economic Left/Right: 9.38, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.51
Sola Scriptura | Soli Deo Gloria | Solo Christo | Sola Gratia | Sola Fide
You didn't, I am trying to understand your logic though.
The "you" was meant more for people in general who say religious people are "pushing their morals onto them", such as homosexual issues, gay marriage, abortion ect.
What I don't understand is how you can say I have "no point" about my example of murder because the Bible is not the only source to condemn murder. You imply that if multiple documents outside of the Bible share the same moral values, then it isn't an example of religion pushing its morals.
PRAIRIE FIRE by William Ayers: Obama's guide to destory America
"Maybe I missed that part of the Constitution"--Joe Steel
You can't spell Liberals without Lies.
Murder, universally accepted by nearly every human being as a taboo, is not a religious moral just because it's listed in the Bible. IMO, religious morals are those that fall outside the universally acccepted, morals like those of the Ten Commandments that don't deal with killing, stealing, and perjury.
Blue laws are perfect examples of forced compliance with religious morals. The commandment to keep the sabbath holy led to prohibition of alcohol sales on Sundays.