Will "Torture" Hearings Include Democrats?

[glockmail]

and I have never suggested that the Geneva Convention applies to them...

Neither do our techniques to deal with them.

When attacked from the gutter one must sometimes get low.

[glockmail]

What does Hillary have to hide?


<script src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/js/2.0/video/evp/module.js?loc=dom&vid=/video/politics/2009/04/22/sot.clinton.dig.cheney.cnn" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Embedded video from <a href="http://www.cnn.com/video">CNN Video</a></noscript>

This will come back to haunt her in her next Presidential run.

[red states rule]

Neither do our techniques to deal with them.

When attacked from the gutter one must sometimes get low.

Can anyone name any terrorist who died as a result of waterboarding?

[red states rule]

This will come back to haunt her in her next Presidential run.

It will be shown ONLY on Fox News and on the internet

[glockmail]

Glock, I have owned him since he posted under MFM

He is so desperate for attention, despite his feeble debate skills. I am the only one here who replies to his insane rants

He's proving the feebleness of his debate skills again at JPP right now by going with his "gay child molester" routine.

[moderate democrat]

Neither do our techniques to deal with them.

When attacked from the gutter one must sometimes get low.

I believe that our techniques may, in fact, violate the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which is the supreme law of OUR land.

[glockmail]

It will be shown ONLY on Fox News and on the internet

And by her opponents.

[red states rule]

And by her opponents.

and Bill will be happy to provide them

[glockmail]

and Bill will be happy to provide them

I dunno I think he'd love to be in a position of power again as First Sodomizer.

[red states rule]

I dunno I think he'd love to be in a position of power again as First Sodomizer.

True, but with Bill it has to be all about him

Back to waterboarding VS terrorist's rights

Considering Tenet said that waterboarding extracted more info than the CIA and FBI could ever extract worked, what would be more effective?

Libs are so wraped up in trying to fight a PC war on terror

[Yurt]

If she broke any laws, I think she should be prosecuted. I think that for anyone of any party. As I said, I am not certain whether merely KNOWING about an illegal activity is itself illegal but would be perfectly willing to have the courts decide that.

bullcrap and you know it....her position makes it clear she is aiding and abetting or at a minimum an accomplice...she swore an oath and if she was given information about others violating the constitution and she did nothing, then yes, she is guilty as long as those who are alleged to have violated the constitution are guilty...

but no one is surprised that you of course take the logic that she is first innocent but oh no, if it is a repub you find fault first....

party over country

[Yurt]

you're not a lawyer and neither am I... if she is guilty of a crime, she should be prosecuted. I would not agree to her getting any sort of pass.

what a pathetic hypocrite....you don't say that when it comes to bush/cheney you assume guilt...

party over country

[red states rule]

bullcrap and you know it....her position makes it clear she is aiding and abetting or at a minimum an accomplice...she swore an oath and if she was given information about others violating the constitution and she did nothing, then yes, she is guilty as long as those who are alleged to have violated the constitution are guilty...

but no one is surprised that you of course take the logic that she is first innocent but oh no, if it is a repub you find fault first....

party over country

Yurt, this is political gamesmanship at it’s worse.

Pelosi knew all along about waterboarding and had no problem with it until it was decided they could hurt George W Bush, the troops, and those hired to protect this country from terror attacks with it.

Somebody leaked this out that the CIA was using this practice, could it have been Nancy Pelosi herself? Or a loyal liberal like Virgil who works for the CIA?

To think someone would put their re-election ahead of what is right for the country is despicable - but typical of the modern day Democrats

[moderate democrat]

bullcrap and you know it....her position makes it clear she is aiding and abetting or at a minimum an accomplice...she swore an oath and if she was given information about others violating the constitution and she did nothing, then yes, she is guilty as long as those who are alleged to have violated the constitution are guilty...

but no one is surprised that you of course take the logic that she is first innocent but oh no, if it is a repub you find fault first....

party over country

I assume that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. If laws were broken, then the people who broke those laws should be prosecuted. period. regardless of party. the folks here on the right do not WANT any such prosecutions. I would suggest that their position is much more partisan than mine.

[moderate democrat]

what a pathetic hypocrite....you don't say that when it comes to bush/cheney you assume guilt...

party over country

I do not assume guilt for Bush OR Cheney...certainly not in any legal sense. I believe that Bush lied about WMD's and about Saddam's connections to Al Qaeda, but he certainly committed no CRIME in doing so. He was not under oath that I am aware of.