Page 40 of 42 FirstFirst ... 303839404142 LastLast
Results 586 to 600 of 627
  1. #586
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    1,026
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Birdzeye View Post


    Could I interest you in some oceanfront property in Arizona?
    DON'T SAY THAT When California drops off. Arizona WILL be beachfront.(My property in the Majave Desert will be under water.)
    Who else is as much a Bush-basher as I???
    An Italian Confusious Say: "He who throwist mud, losith ground"

  2. #587
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    You first. Name one that is true.


    “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa .”
    This was taken out of previous speeches, but put back in the SOTU speech.

  3. #588
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,214
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2939

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lily View Post
    This was taken out of previous speeches, but put back in the SOTU speech.
    Uh, Saddam was trying to get uranium from Africa. As far as we know, he didn't succeed, but he was definitely trying. I mean, even Joe Wilson says he was setting up 'imports' with Niger, and the only thing they export in any kind of quantity is uranium.
    "Lighght"
    - This 'poem' was bought and paid for with $2,250 of YOUR money.

    Name one thing the government does better than the private sector and I'll show you something that requires the use of force to accomplish.

  4. #589
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,194
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbit View Post
    Uh, Saddam was trying to get uranium from Africa. As far as we know, he didn't succeed, but he was definitely trying. I mean, even Joe Wilson says he was setting up 'imports' with Niger, and the only thing they export in any kind of quantity is uranium.
    No actually what Joe said is that they sent a small delegation once, who was rebuffed, and many years ago.

    Trying is an active tense verb.

  5. #590
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    ````````````````

  6. #591
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doniston View Post
    OK. JUST one

    He misled the congress and the american people on the reasons to go to war.....
    Bullshit. Your heros Clinton and Kerry said the exact same things.

  7. #592
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lily View Post
    This was taken out of previous speeches, but put back in the SOTU speech.
    What part of that was not true?

  8. #593
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    What part of that was not true?
    The entire quote.

  9. #594
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Carson City
    Posts
    3,147
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    839

    Default ........

    Quote Originally Posted by lily View Post
    ````````````````
    Huh?

    If you attack the Clintons publically make sure all your friends know your not planning on commiting suicide ~ McCain 2008
    Happiness is Obama's picture on the back of a milk carton.

  10. #595
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Carson City
    Posts
    3,147
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    839

    Default ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    Bullshit. Your heros Clinton and Kerry said the exact same things.
    Don't forget Carter as well!!!!!!!

    If you attack the Clintons publically make sure all your friends know your not planning on commiting suicide ~ McCain 2008
    Happiness is Obama's picture on the back of a milk carton.

  11. #596
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lily View Post
    The entire quote.
    So you assert that: The British Government had not learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa?

  12. #597
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by glockmail View Post
    So you assert that: The British Government had not learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa?
    Well sure.........if you want to consider the "information" was taken from a badly forged document.

  13. #598
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lily View Post
    Well sure.........if you want to consider the "information" was taken from a badly forged document.

  14. #599
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    1,021
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/

    Fake Iraq documents 'embarrassing' for U.S.
    From David Ensor
    CNN Washington Bureau
    Friday, March 14, 2003 Posted: 10:43 PM EST (0343 GMT)


    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Intelligence documents that U.S. and British governments
    said were strong evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons have been
    dismissed as forgeries by U.N. weapons inspectors.

    The documents, given to International Atomic Energy Agency Director General
    Mohamed ElBaradei, indicated that Iraq might have tried to buy 500 tons of
    uranium from Niger, but the agency said they were "obvious" fakes.

    U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell referred to the documents directly in
    his presentation to the U.N. Security Council outlining the Bush
    administration's case against Iraq.

    "I'm sure the FBI and CIA must be mortified by this because it is extremely
    embarrassing to them," former CIA official Ray Close said.

    Responding to questions about the documents from lawmakers, Powell said, "It
    was provided in good faith to the inspectors and our agency received it in
    good faith, not participating ... in any way in any falsification
    activities."

    "It was the information that we had. We provided it. If that information is
    inaccurate, fine," Powell said on NBC's "Meet the Press" last Sunday.

    "We don't believe that all the issues surrounding nuclear weapons have been
    resolved [in Iraq]," he said.

    How were forgeries missed?
    But the discovery raises questions such as why the apparent forgeries were
    given to inspectors and why U.S. and British intelligence agents did not
    recognize that they were not authentic.

    Sources said that one of the documents was a letter discussing the uranium
    deal supposedly signed by Niger President Tandja Mamadou. The sources
    described the signature as "childlike" and said that it clearly was not
    Mamadou's.

    Another, written on paper from a 1980s military government in Niger, bears
    the date of October 2000 and the signature of a man who by then had not been
    foreign minister of Niger in 14 years, sources said.

    "The IAEA has concluded, with the concurrence of outside experts that these
    documents -- which formed the basis for the reports of recent uranium
    transactions between Iraq and Niger -- are not in fact authentic," ElBaradei
    said in his March 7 presentation to the U.N. Security Council.

    Close said the CIA should have known better.

    "They have tremendously sophisticated and experienced people in their
    technical services division, who wouldn't allow a forgery like this to get
    by," Close said. "I mean it's just mystifying to me. I can't understand it."

    A U.S. intelligence official said that the documents were passed on to the
    International Atomic Energy Agency within days of being received with the
    comment, " 'We don't know the provenance of this information, but here it
    is.' "

    If a mistake was made, a U.S. official suggested, it was more likely due to
    incompetence not malice.

    "That's a convenient explanation, but it doesn't satisfy me," Close said.
    "Incompetence I have not seen in those agencies. I've seen plenty of malice,
    but I've never seen incompetence."

    Who made the forgeries?
    But the question remains -- who is responsible for the apparent forgeries?

    Experts said the suspects include the intelligence services of Iraq's
    neighbors, other pro-war nations, Iraqi opposition groups or simply con men.

    Most rule out the United States, Great Britain or Israel because they said
    those countries' intelligence services would have been able to make much
    more convincing forgeries if they had chosen to do so.

    President Bush even highlighted the documents in his State of the Union
    address on January 28.

    "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought
    significant quantities of uranium from Africa," Bush said.

    U.S. officials said that the assertion by the president and British
    government was also based on additional evidence of Iraqi efforts to obtain
    uranium from another African country. But officials would not say which
    nation and a knowledgable U.S. official said that there was not much to that
    evidence either.

  15. #600
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default


    Interesting....

    You do realize the source of this article is the opinion of one person: Ray Close. Not to attack the messenger, but to simply understand what other opinions that he may have:


    http://www.counterpunch.org/close08262006.html Ray Close was a top CIA analyst in the Near East Division. He is now a member of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity. He can be reached at close@counterpunch.org
    http://www.atlanticblog.com/archives/000967.html VIPS does not seem to have a website, but its email is vips@counterpunch.org, and their open letter appears to have been published at CounterPunch (run by Alexander Cockburn, the Nation columnist), an outfit whose staple is stuff comparing Bush to Hitler. VIPS also published an open letter in opposition to the war at Common Dreams back in February. The spokesman for VIPS is Raymond McGovern, a retired CIA analyst. McGovern's email is also at CounterPunch. He is giving a briefing today with Rep. Dennis Kucinich. McGovern has compared the Iraq war to Vietnam, even saying that it could lead to nuclear war. He has charged that if WMDs are found in Iraq, they may well have been planted. He believes Tenet's job is safe because if Tenet were fired, he would reveal that the White House ignored intelligence warnings pre-9/11. McGovern has urged CIA analysts to illegally release classified documents to show what he believes to be true, specifically citing Daniel Ellsberg.
    Another member of the VIPS steering committee is William Christison, who among other things believes that the Bush administration is attempting to colonize the Middle East, jointly with Israel. He believes that the war on terror is being used to turn the US into a military dictatorship. He is also a backer of the left-wing UrgentCall, along with people such as Noam Chomsky, Barbara Kingsolver, Julian Bond, and Jonathan Schell.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums