Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Some W. House e-mails on fired attorneys may be lost

    So the conspiracy deepens.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070412/...u4SRRIJOADW7oF

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some White House staff wrote e-mail messages about official business on Republican Party accounts, and some may have been wrongly deleted, the administration said on Wednesday in an embarrassing disclosure tied to the probe into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys.

    The White House said it could not rule out the possibility that some official e-mails relating to the firings had been deleted and are lost.

    Democrats in Congress have been seeking copies of e-mails from the Republican National Committee as part of an investigation into whether the firing of the prosecutors last year was politically motivated.

    White House spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters 22 White House officials were allowed to maintain e-mail addresses through the Republican National Committee. They included President George W. Bush's senior political adviser, Karl Rove, and several of his deputies.

    Democrats have been seeking information that might tie Rove to the decision to fire the attorneys.

    Some White House aides trying to avoid violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits using government property for certain political activities, may have used the political account to communicate about official White House business, Stanzel said.

    Some of those official e-mails may be lost because the RNC had a policy of deleting e-mails about every 30 days from its accounts. That policy was changed in 2004 to exclude White House officials, who are required to retain records and correspondence and everything e-mailed from a White House account is automatically archived, Stanzel said.

    "Some official e-mails have potentially been lost and that is a mistake the White House is aggressively working to correct," he said.

    Asked whether some of the lost e-mails could be related to the firings of the U.S. attorneys last year, Stanzel said: "That can't be ruled out."

    The White House admission came as the Democratic-led Congress moved to obtain additional documents from the administration in its investigation of the firing of eight prosecutors, a case that has prompted bipartisan calls for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to resign.

    Gonzales received a subpoena on Tuesday from the House Judiciary Committee for documents related to the firings.

    The White House said Bush had asked the Justice Department to be "fully responsive" to the request.

    Gonzales, who with Bush's public support has rejected calls to resign, is to appear next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which plans to authorize subpoenas of its own on Thursday for administration documents.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,168
    Thanks (Given)
    34544
    Thanks (Received)
    26641
    Likes (Given)
    2496
    Likes (Received)
    10127
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    So the conspiracy deepens.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070412/...u4SRRIJOADW7oF

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Some White House staff wrote e-mail messages about official business on Republican Party accounts, and some may have been wrongly deleted, the administration said on Wednesday in an embarrassing disclosure tied to the probe into the firing of eight U.S. attorneys.

    The White House said it could not rule out the possibility that some official e-mails relating to the firings had been deleted and are lost.

    Democrats in Congress have been seeking copies of e-mails from the Republican National Committee as part of an investigation into whether the firing of the prosecutors last year was politically motivated.

    White House spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters 22 White House officials were allowed to maintain e-mail addresses through the Republican National Committee. They included President George W. Bush's senior political adviser, Karl Rove, and several of his deputies.

    Democrats have been seeking information that might tie Rove to the decision to fire the attorneys.

    Some White House aides trying to avoid violating the Hatch Act, which prohibits using government property for certain political activities, may have used the political account to communicate about official White House business, Stanzel said.

    Some of those official e-mails may be lost because the RNC had a policy of deleting e-mails about every 30 days from its accounts. That policy was changed in 2004 to exclude White House officials, who are required to retain records and correspondence and everything e-mailed from a White House account is automatically archived, Stanzel said.

    "Some official e-mails have potentially been lost and that is a mistake the White House is aggressively working to correct," he said.

    Asked whether some of the lost e-mails could be related to the firings of the U.S. attorneys last year, Stanzel said: "That can't be ruled out."

    The White House admission came as the Democratic-led Congress moved to obtain additional documents from the administration in its investigation of the firing of eight prosecutors, a case that has prompted bipartisan calls for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to resign.

    Gonzales received a subpoena on Tuesday from the House Judiciary Committee for documents related to the firings.

    The White House said Bush had asked the Justice Department to be "fully responsive" to the request.

    Gonzales, who with Bush's public support has rejected calls to resign, is to appear next week before the Senate Judiciary Committee, which plans to authorize subpoenas of its own on Thursday for administration documents.
    What conspiracy? That the President can hire or fire as he sees fit, and every President before Bush has done so?

    And this investigation is to see if the firings were politically motivated? Well, DUH. Go figure. Every President has hired and fired the attorneys and put he wanted in their place. I'd say that's a stupid question with an obvious answer, and yet another example of my tax dollars being wasted by Democrats on a witchhunt.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    The lying about doesn't go over so well though.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bluebonnet Country
    Posts
    720
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    ... and yet another example of my tax dollars being wasted by Democrats on a witchhunt.
    When it gets to $64 million, call me. We'll compare notes.

    Violating the Presidential Records Act is just another in a long list of scandals that this administration has yet to answer for.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,168
    Thanks (Given)
    34544
    Thanks (Received)
    26641
    Likes (Given)
    2496
    Likes (Received)
    10127
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron Von Esslingen View Post
    When it gets to $64 million, call me. We'll compare notes.

    Violating the Presidential Records Act is just another in a long list of scandals that this administration has yet to answer for.
    You witchhunters NEVER give up on yor neverending quest to throw shit agains the wall and see if it sticks, huh?

    Cost is irrelevant. The fact is, it's stupid. It's looking for the obvious and trying to make something bad out of it for nothing BUT partisan witchhunting.

    What's really funny is the tighteous indignation you dems are going to display when the next time a Dem president does it, the republicans want the same answers. Then it'll be ... what're you talking about? Every president does this. No big deal.

    F-ing hypocrites from Hell with NO peers.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bluebonnet Country
    Posts
    720
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    228

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    What's really funny is the tighteous indignation you dems are going to display when the next time a Dem president does it, the republicans want the same answers.
    That's the $64 million we spent on the last witch hunt. We'll see if Congress conducts it's oversight responsibly or whether they will act like the Newt-led republican congress of yore. At least we can be sure that Senator Leahy won't be banging his secretary while he investigates the president.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441563

    Default

    Their so desperate...now their trying to say we don't have a right to delete our emails......

    HOW DO YOU SAY.........DESPERATE...
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    So the conspiracy deepens.

    ....
    What conspiracy? The attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President, and the President's staff does the firings systematically.

    How easily we forget when Clinton fired all 90 odd attorneys from the Bush 41 Administration.

    Bush 43 should have done the same, but he tried to be fair, and per usual, no good deed goes unpunished.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Like I said it was the lying about it not the firings themselves.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,672
    Thanks (Given)
    177
    Thanks (Received)
    680
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1200646

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    Like I said it was the lying about it not the firings themselves.
    What lies?

    Seems like another attempt to "Scooter Libby" someone in the Administration. As that is the New Democrat Tactic I say tell them all nothing, nada, zero, 5th Ammendment.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,168
    Thanks (Given)
    34544
    Thanks (Received)
    26641
    Likes (Given)
    2496
    Likes (Received)
    10127
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron Von Esslingen View Post
    That's the $64 million we spent on the last witch hunt. We'll see if Congress conducts it's oversight responsibly or whether they will act like the Newt-led republican congress of yore. At least we can be sure that Senator Leahy won't be banging his secretary while he investigates the president.
    I thought banging your secretary was a non-issue with you lefties? Are you just trying to make my point about the hypocrisy for me?

    You can try to whitewash with the term "Oversight" all you want. If that's all it was, I'd have no problem with it. All it is in reality is partisan witch hunting.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Well people have resigned over it so I'd say it's more than nothing. Lies, calling them incompetent for no reason. lying to congress about it, refusing to testify.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    48,168
    Thanks (Given)
    34544
    Thanks (Received)
    26641
    Likes (Given)
    2496
    Likes (Received)
    10127
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    373 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475529

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiberalNation View Post
    Like I said it was the lying about it not the firings themselves.
    Yeah ... WHAT lies?

    First off, the President doesn't have to explain himself at all in this matter. Second, it is not Congress's business to even ask. "I just felt like it" should be sufficient enough reason.

    And as I said, wait until this precedent being set gets thrown back in the Dem's faces. The wailing and gnashing of teeth will be of Bibilical proportion.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    58692

    Default

    sombody should check sandy bergers bvds

    "I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."

    ~Albert Camus

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    11,274
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    58692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron Von Esslingen View Post
    That's the $64 million we spent on the last witch hunt. We'll see if Congress conducts it's oversight responsibly or whether they will act like the Newt-led republican congress of yore. At least we can be sure that Senator Leahy won't be banging his secretary while he investigates the president.
    at least newt actually drilled her....big bill used a cigar....what a pussy

    "I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is."

    ~Albert Camus

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums