Maxine Waters Urges Obama to Pass Health Care Using the "Nuclear Option" - Video

[glockmail]

I guess you missed the fact that Southernman threatened to kill me. That is why I have contacted my police department to provide them with the exact wording of his threat. That has nothing to do with you.....

Words have meanings. What made you think that I threatened you?

[glockmail]

we've known one another for about a decade. we served on several rotarian committees together. He's a nice guy. I expect a reply to my email to him tomorrow sometime. I hope it doesn't cause damo any trouble.

I look forward to sending him links to some of your most renowned posts.

[maineman]

Words have meanings. What made you think that I threatened you?

your very words.

unambiguous

[maineman]

I look forward to sending him links to some of your most renowned posts.

unfortunately for you, none of mine threaten you or anyone else with bodily harm.

you screwed up cowboy.

[glockmail]

unfortunately for you, none of mine threaten you or anyone else with bodily harm.

you screwed up cowboy.

"9mm or .38?

I got both.

which fits your knee better?"

[maineman]

"9mm or .38?

I got both.

which fits your knee better?"

from your PM to me:

"A little paralysis gas seeping into your house late at night, a loaded trunk, a long trip back to North Carolina, a 20' deep hole inside a building under construction..."

ooops.

[glockmail]

from your PM to me:

"A little paralysis gas seeping into your house late at night, a loaded trunk, a long trip back to North Carolina, a 20' deep hole inside a building under construction..."

ooops.

Any communication between members and/or staff via the private message system will remain private. Discussing of PM's on the forum without explicit permission will result in disciplinary action.

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=3487

Oops.

[jimnyc]

http://www.debatepolicy.com/showthread.php?t=3487

Oops.

Was this a PM from this board or another board?

[glockmail]

Was this a PM from this board or another board?

Discussing of PM's on the forum without explicit permission will result in disciplinary action.

Does it matter?

[jimnyc]

Does it matter?

Yes, it does. My job is to protect the privacy expected while utilizing the software I provide everyone with. The rule was meant to give members a way to communicate with an expectation of privacy. What you guys do elsewhere is none of my concern, and shouldn't even be brought to this board in the first place. Additionally, I have no way whatsoever to verify anything involving this argument, although it would be difficult enough on my own board.

The BOTH of you are making comments to one another that are nothing more than an eyesore to this board. Neither is an innocent party. I asked when announcing maineman's return that the threads remain on topic and to stop with the non-stop feuding. It would appear that both sides are ignoring my request. I can only do so much when members refuse to put one another on ignore. Nonetheless, I do not, and do not want, responsibility for things that are done/said off this website.

[glockmail]

OK, so just for the record, maineman accused me of "threatening to kill him", where I was responding to his message: "9mm or .38? I got both. which fits your knee better?". Now he's claiming to send message board PMs (from another board) to his local chief of police. I think it would be pretty funny to get an email from "Wayne" on this. LOL

[maineman]

Yes, it does. My job is to protect the privacy expected while utilizing the software I provide everyone with. The rule was meant to give members a way to communicate with an expectation of privacy. What you guys do elsewhere is none of my concern, and shouldn't even be brought to this board in the first place. Additionally, I have no way whatsoever to verify anything involving this argument, although it would be difficult enough on my own board.

The BOTH of you are making comments to one another that are nothing more than an eyesore to this board. Neither is an innocent party. I asked when announcing maineman's return that the threads remain on topic and to stop with the non-stop feuding. It would appear that both sides are ignoring my request. I can only do so much when members refuse to put one another on ignore. Nonetheless, I do not, and do not want, responsibility for things that are done/said off this website.

I am trying Jim... I would love to stay on topic, but glock, rsr, and jeff don't seem to want to do the same.

[jimnyc]

I am trying Jim... I would love to stay on topic, but glock, rsr, and jeff don't seem to want to do the same.

If someone truly wanted to take the high road, and truly wanted to debate without going off course - those individuals would place others on ignore and all the problems would cease.

[maineman]

If someone truly wanted to take the high road, and truly wanted to debate without going off course - those individuals would place others on ignore and all the problems would cease.

OK

wilco

[cat slave]

Dont we have bigger fish to fry????? The enemy of my enemy etc.