Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867369

    Default Baucus bill would destroy private health insurance

    Some Dems have been honest their intent is to put private health ins compnaies out of business - leaving the Federal government the only place to get your healthcare ins

    I am glad to see more of this information coming out



    Baucus bill would destroy private health insurance

    Some breathed a sigh of relief that a new health care bill introduced by Sen. Max Baucus does not include government insurance. This solace is premature. The Montana Democrat's bill proposes new regulations that would doom the private insurance industry.

    The lion's share of President Obama's Wednesday address to Congress pushed Mr. Baucus' plan. Because a direct government takeover of health care sparked violent public protests, the new strategy is to take smaller bites out of private care. The president still promises more service for less cost with greater government involvement, which is impossible.

    It takes chutzpah for Democrats to claim that a bill that taxes health insurance will encourage more people to get private insurance. The claim that new taxes -- or "fees" as the bill calls them -- will not increase costs makes no sense. Democrats may pretend they can get tax revenue without raising prices, but any increased cost caused by taxation would be passed on to the consumer.

    According to the Baucus bill, any insurance plan that caps benefits would be prohibited. It doesn't matter if the cap is $1 million or $10 million. There's no way to avoid greater costs with such mandated expansiveness of coverage. The same rule applies to any ban on higher fees for pre-existing conditions, a prohibition that is in every Democratic health care plan.

    There is a tax for those who don't buy insurance, which ranges from $750 for the poorest individual to $3,800 for families. This doesn't come close to covering costs even with limited benefits. In 2008, average health insurance costs were $4,704 for individuals and $12,682 for families. If there were no penalty for having pre-existing conditions, people would simply pay the tax and wait until they got sick to buy insurance. This would raise costs dramatically because sicknesses tend to be worse when care is deferred to the last possible moment.

    The Baucus bill also raises taxes on pharmaceutical manufacturers, clinical laboratories and the makers of medical devices. At every turn, costs are increased with no way for industry to recoup the money. Over time, this will drive private companies out of business.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...lth-insurance/


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Cumberland Plateau in TN
    Posts
    996
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13286

    Default

    That man has friggin lost his mind! This gets more insane by the day.
    What are reparations? Making me pay
    for something I had nothing to do with compensates no one
    who suffered an injustice therefore I would be penalized for
    something I didnt do and someone else would receive a settlement
    for an injury they did not suffer.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    45,781
    Thanks (Given)
    20
    Thanks (Received)
    1013
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3867369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cat slave View Post
    That man has friggin lost his mind! This gets more insane by the day.
    It is what Dems want. They do want to put private ins companies out of business

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dT4mV3R7vu4&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dT4mV3R7vu4&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


    How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin.

    Ronald Reagan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    In your head
    Posts
    23,942
    Thanks (Given)
    4224
    Thanks (Received)
    4563
    Likes (Given)
    1428
    Likes (Received)
    1079
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    39
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9173679

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by red states rule View Post
    Some Dems have been honest their intent is to put private health ins compnaies out of business - leaving the Federal government the only place to get your healthcare ins
    The only question is how long. Higher regulations, taxes, mandates, etc. would raise insurance costs and give more ammunition to the left about insurance companies.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums