Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lousiville, Kentucky
    Posts
    5,840
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    8
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Murder charge dropped against 1 Marine in Haditha killings

    Good for him bad for the others still facing charges.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070417/..._iraq_shooting

    LOS ANGELES - The Marines Corps said Tuesday it had dropped all charges against a sergeant in exchange for his testimony against fellow Marines accused of killing 24 civilians in Haditha, the deadliest criminal case to arise from the Iraq war.

    Sgt. Sanick P. Dela Cruz had been charged with unpremeditated murder in the death of five Iraq civilians.

    Lt. Gen. James Mattis, who announced the deal Tuesday, said the charges against Dela Cruz had been dismissed April 2. Dela Cruz was given immunity in exchange for his testimony, the Marines said.

    "Dela Cruz is required to testify," Marine spokesman Lt. Col. Sean Gibson said.

    The Marine squad had suffered a fatality on Nov. 19, 2005, when its convoy was rocked by a roadside bomb blast. In the aftermath of the explosion, the troops are accused of killing 24 Iraqis in Haditha.

    Four enlisted Marines were charged with unpremeditated murder, and four officers were charged with failing to adequately report the deaths.

    Aside from the murder charge, Dela Cruz faced one charge of making a false official statement with intent to deceive. He faced a possible life sentence, dishonorable discharge, dismissal and forfeiture of pay.

    Dela Cruz, 24, is the first Marine to make a deal with the government in the case. His testimony will likely form a vital part of the prosecution's case.

    The Marine Corps announced the charges in December, but there have been no preliminary hearings and no court dates have been finalized. What would have been the first hearing in the case, for another Marine accused of murder, was recently delayed at the government's request.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,942
    Thanks (Given)
    34353
    Thanks (Received)
    26451
    Likes (Given)
    2375
    Likes (Received)
    9985
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    This is bullshit. If he's guilty, he needs to fry with the rest of them.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    434
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    220

    Default

    I hope it's worth it, to let a murderer go free so they can have enough evidence against the rest of them. Those assholes put a big black mark on our brave military's name.
    "Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows"
    Martin Luther King Jr.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,942
    Thanks (Given)
    34353
    Thanks (Received)
    26451
    Likes (Given)
    2375
    Likes (Received)
    9985
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Samantha View Post
    I hope it's worth it, to let a murderer go free so they can have enough evidence against the rest of them. Those assholes put a big black mark on our brave military's name.
    I actually agree with you. I have no tolerance for those who violate the laws of war.

    If what was reported was true, these rogue agents acting outside the confines of military law and the laws of war, executed unarmed civilians.

    I'm just wondering how weak the case is if they have to offer immunity to one of them.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    434
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunny View Post
    I actually agree with you. I have no tolerance for those who violate the laws of war.

    If what was reported was true, these rogue agents acting outside the confines of military law and the laws of war, executed unarmed civilians.

    I'm just wondering how weak the case is if they have to offer immunity to one of them.
    I know for a fact that our troops are honorable and brave. When a few psycho killers damage our military's name and our country's name the way these guys and some others did, I'd like to see the strong arm of the law slam down upon them. I am glad you agree with me about those who violate military law.

    I know you don't agree with me on this, but when the people who've been elected to the White House break our countries laws, I'd like to see the strong arm of the law slam down on them too.

    If they don't stack the courts with cronies first...

    Anyway, this is a depressing story and those soldiers have our country's damaged honor on their hands, as well as the blood of innocent civilians.

    I'd like to see the military put our men through some extra training on civilian safety.
    "Wars are poor chisels for carving out peaceful tomorrows"
    Martin Luther King Jr.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Republic of Texas
    Posts
    47,942
    Thanks (Given)
    34353
    Thanks (Received)
    26451
    Likes (Given)
    2375
    Likes (Received)
    9985
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    12
    Mentioned
    369 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475526

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Samantha View Post
    I know for a fact that our troops are honorable and brave. When a few psycho killers damage our military's name and our country's name the way these guys and some others did, I'd like to see the strong arm of the law slam down upon them. I am glad you agree with me about those who violate military law.

    I know you don't agree with me on this, but when the people who've been elected to the White House break our countries laws, I'd like to see the strong arm of the law slam down on them too.

    If they don't stack the courts with cronies first...

    Anyway, this is a depressing story and those soldiers have our country's damaged honor on their hands, as well as the blood of innocent civilians.

    I'd like to see the military put our men through some extra training on civilian safety.
    The military is trained in noncombatant safety to the point that they violate the basic principle of not exposing themselves unnecessarily to risk to any other reason than mission accomplishment. They go around, hold fire and/or get fired upon themselves at times simply because of noncombatants.

    The rules of engagement, US military law and the law of war is pumped into our heads until it is oozing out our ears.

    All the training in the world will not stop criminals from committing criminal acts.
    “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.” Edumnd Burke

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums