NJ Democratic Party Mimics ACORN

[Kathianne]

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.c...Y4YmRiYWUyMjQ=

Thursday, October 29, 2009

HORSERACE
Democrats Ask New Jersey Secretary of State to Ignore Mismatched Signatures on Absentee-Ballot Requests
This year, New Jersey’s registered voters can request a mail-in ballot for any reason. (Before 2005, voters needed to provide a reason for why they needed an absentee ballot.) The state received about 150,000 absentee-ballot applications this year.

On about 2,300 of those applications so far, the signature on the request form does not match the signature on the voter’s registration forms with the state.

In a development that is depressingly predictable, the New Jersey Democratic party is asking the state to provide provisional ballots for all these voters. Those ballots could, presumably, be used to overcome any narrow lead by Republican Chris Christie over Democrat Jon Corzine on Election Day.

A mass distribution of provisional ballots, at the request of a political party, would represent a significant change from established law. Currently, when a county clerk rejects an absentee-ballot request, the clerk tries to contact the voter — through mail, by phone, and in some cases, by attempting to contact the voter in person. And a person who has spoken to some of New Jersey’s county clerks says they’re granting wide latitude on signature styles; for them to reject a ballot request because of the signature, it has to be dramatically different from the one on file.

Could some of these cases be an election official misjudging the natural deviation in two handwriting samples from the same person? Certainly, and that's why the current system has clerks reaching out to rejected voters (presuming they actually exist) to sort out the discrepancy. But Democrats want to short-circuit the established methods of sorting out the problem, and in fact to ban rejections based on signature mismatches entirely....

[PostmodernProphet]

NJ Democratic Party Mimics ACORN

which came first, the chicken or the egg?.......

[Kathianne]

which came first, the chicken or the egg?.......

Wouldn't that be acorn or oak?

[sgtdmski]

Wait a second, if the request do not match the signatures, why is this not be investigated.

I am sorry but this is clearly voter fraud, so tell me why is the Democratic party not wanting this investigated. It makes you wonder if the democratic party is okay with voter fraud. Thus far their tactics say they really are. Unless it is that Republican operatives were the ones who did this deed. The democrats should really want the investigation to proceed, unless it was they who conducted the fraud. Their decision to not investigate seriously points to that fact.

Remember, actions speak louder than words.

If they win the NJ election next week, everyone will wonder whether or not they did so fairly, and right now, it would seem that they did not!!!!!

So unless the Republican wins the election next week, it would seem that the only way for the Democrats to win is through fraud.

dmk

[Gaffer]

Wait till next year when the fraud is rampant. They are not giving up there power through a simple thing like a silly election.

[sgtdmski]

Every legislative law passed or proposed to prevent voter fraud has not been supported by the Democrats.

Voter identification laws have been challenged in court. Why? If someone wants to vote, why can their identity not be verified by a state issued identification card. If this affects the poor then why not allow those who are poor to have the state identification for free.

dmk