Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    47,604
    Thanks (Given)
    23858
    Thanks (Received)
    17377
    Likes (Given)
    9630
    Likes (Received)
    6081
    Piss Off (Given)
    85
    Piss Off (Received)
    10
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    21475523

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    You can spin it any way you want. The attack took place on Sept. 11, 2001. With plenty of warning signs for months prior.
    Who was Commander in Chief on that date? Who failed to protect America?

    Second point: Soldiers in Afghanistan are not "protecting America." They are protecting Afghanistan.
    The soldiers need to be brought back to America to protect us here.
    Bush had a little less than 9 months in office, which had followed perhaps the worst transition ever by a president. Obama had nearly 11 months in office, with not only 'warnings' of attempts, but undeniable attempts. While 9/11 was certainly more devastating, no doubt Fort Hood was more preventable, meaning Obama is the bigger loser.


    "The government is a child that has found their parents credit card, and spends knowing that they never have to reconcile the bill with their own money"-Shannon Churchill


  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    10,089
    Thanks (Given)
    18723
    Thanks (Received)
    8005
    Likes (Given)
    132
    Likes (Received)
    26
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9292005

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Evil View Post
    Speaking of loons.....

    Amazing bit of ignorance as usual but then again no surprises when the topic started about Obama that it turns out to be Dubya's fault.
    Works that way every time, usally winds up being the Bushies fault though

    And again gabby if Osama is doing such a great Job protecting us, why do we need the soldiers here to do so ? I am all for our soldiers being out of harms way but I am trying to figure out your logic

    How about if Osama just does as he promises and lets our soldiers fight the war, gives them everything they need instead of spending a third of his time worried about fox news and the other 2/3 trying to shove his 1/2 ass health care plan down our throats

    I agree with ya that the terrorist are going back and fourth threw other countries but IMO we have to grow a set of balls attack them and kill them without the WH trying to make believe they have even a little bit of a clue, Once we where attacked all bets are off , we are the strongest military in the world , let them do there job how ever they need to

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    10,089
    Thanks (Given)
    18723
    Thanks (Received)
    8005
    Likes (Given)
    132
    Likes (Received)
    26
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9292005

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    You can spin it any way you want. The attack took place on Sept. 11, 2001. With plenty of warning signs for months prior.
    Who was Commander in Chief on that date? Who failed to protect America?

    Second point: Soldiers in Afghanistan are not "protecting America." They are protecting Afghanistan.
    The soldiers need to be brought back to America to protect us here.
    Wow good points I guess, but under your theory today is 11/14/09 osama is Commander in Chief on this date so I guess he is solely responsible for

    1) Fort Hood

    2) the economy

    3) unemployment

    And lets not forget all the warning signs he had

    Just to name a few, seems the country is in worse shape than I can ever remember it being and osama in in charge so that must make it 100% his fault (your theory) can't have it both ways gabs, seems if he is solely responsible shouldn't ya be going on about how to impeach him, instead of still trying to blame things on the Bushies ? just a thought
    Last edited by Jeff; 11-14-2009 at 09:28 AM.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    2,991
    Thanks (Given)
    696
    Thanks (Received)
    461
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    1985978

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    Wow good points I guess, but under your theory today is 11/14/09 osama is Commander in Chief on this date so I guess he is solely responsible for

    1) Fort Hood

    2) the economy

    3) unemployment

    And lets not forget all the warning signs he had

    Just to name a few, seems the country is in worse shape than I can ever remember it being and osama in in charge so that must make it 100% his fault (your theory) can't have it both ways gabs, seems if he is solely responsible shouldn't ya be going on about how to impeach him, instead of still trying to blame things on the Bushies ? just a thought
    Now come on Jeff, you know this isn't fair. You're using logic and reason. Gabby cant keep up with that.
    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
    Samuel Adams


    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  5. #20
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,117
    Thanks (Given)
    30
    Thanks (Received)
    113
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    400524

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crin63 View Post
    Now come on Jeff, you know this isn't fair. You're using logic and reason. Gabby cant keep up with that.
    No doubt but I guess give her a bit of credit for posting such obvious leftist crap even if it is outright stupidity, she's been doing it from day one!

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    a place called, Liberty
    Posts
    9,922
    Thanks (Given)
    102
    Thanks (Received)
    314
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Piss Off (Given)
    0
    Piss Off (Received)
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    441562

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gabosaurus View Post
    Fails to defend America? How so?
    Last time I checked, Obama has not allowed our country to be attacked. The bumbling previous administration can not make this claim.
    he hasn't allowed our country to be attacked..the play on words is so cute..
    how bout that trade center, the Uss Cole, the Oklahoma city bombings under Clinton? why did he allow that? maybe you can explain that for us..
    Last edited by stephanie; 11-14-2009 at 12:16 PM.
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself."
    Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Debate Policy - Political Forums