Calling Jimmy out

[loosecannon]

Of course it is, dip shit. "Bot" insinuates "robot", insinuating that conservatives don't think for themselves. It is the Liberals who are incapable of thinking.

It is an attack against a non specified group. It isn't an adhom. It wasn't directed at any body in particular therefore it isn't a personal attack. The thread is what a page long, that was already covered.

The thread was an invitation to Jimmy to a debate he originally asked for.

It really wasn't an invitation to you to argue about trivial details.

OH and BTW your post contained an adhom, better work on your own shit and let others take care of theirs.

[glockmail]

It is an attack against a non specified group. It isn't an adhom. It wasn't directed at any body in particular therefore it isn't a personal attack. The thread is what a page long, that was already covered.

The thread was an invitation to Jimmy to a debate he originally asked for.

It really wasn't an invitation to you to argue about trivial details.

OH and BTW your post contained an adhom, better work on your own shit and let others take care of theirs.

I attacked you in retaliation for attacking me, as a conservative.

By your logic, its OK to call people "nigger", "dyke", or "faggot", as long as you don't call them out as individuals, right?

[loosecannon]

I attacked you in retaliation for attacking me, as a conservative.

By your logic, its OK to call people "nigger", "dyke", or "faggot", as long as you don't call them out as individuals, right?

No you totally missed the point with that one.

It isn't an adhominem to talk about what the crackers do, or what the spics think about....

That doesn't mean it is or isn't OK.

I was specifically addressing Manu who erroneously pointed out that my opening posts said "no ad homs" and used a reference to "rightwingbots".

He said rightwingbots was an adhom, it isn't.

Can we get back on topic now?

[glockmail]

No you totally missed the point with that one.

It isn't an adhominem to talk about what the crackers do, or what the spics think about....

That doesn't mean it is or isn't OK.

I was specifically addressing Manu who erroneously pointed out that my opening posts said "no ad homs" and used a reference to "rightwingbots".

He said rightwingbots was an adhom, it isn't.

Can we get back on topic now?

So are you a nigger, dyke, kyke, spic or faggot?

[loosecannon]

So are you a nigger, dyke, kyke, spic or faggot?

Good, now if you had called me a nigger, dyke, kyke, spic or faggot, then that would be an ad hom.

[OCA]

Rightwingbots is an adhom, he's being obtuse.

Its as if you are saying nigger is an adhom but niggerS isn't, absolutely fucking illiterate.

[loosecannon]

Rightwingbots is an adhom, he's being obtuse.

Its as if you are saying nigger is an adhom but niggerS isn't, absolutely fucking illiterate.

No OCA. Calling YOU a rightwingbot is an adhom.

Saying "rightwingbots think Rush is a credible news outlet" is not.

If the nuance of that distinction really escapes you let me know.

[glockmail]

No OCA. Calling YOU a rightwingbot is an adhom.

Saying "rightwingbots think Rush is a credible news outlet" is not.

If the nuance of that distinction really escapes you let me know.

Shit for brains.

[loosecannon]

Shit for brains.

we can only assume a fairly simple idea is over your head.

[glockmail]

we can only assume a fairly simple idea is over your head.

There you go: an adhom against me.

[OCA]

No OCA. Calling YOU a rightwingbot is an adhom.

Saying "rightwingbots think Rush is a credible news outlet" is not.

If the nuance of that distinction really escapes you let me know.

Simply put: you are fucking wrong.

Try going downtown and yelling niggers and see if its an adhom or not......illiterate, completely void of any knowledge whatsoever.

[loosecannon]

There you go: an adhom against me.

Not at all, now if I had called you a simpleton, THAT would have been an adhom.

Is this really that hard to figure out?

An attack against a specific individual person which is not an insult alone but a negative label.

Flip flopper> not necesarily
asshole> definitely
Bushbot> probably
Red stater> no

[loosecannon]

Simply put: you are fucking wrong.

Insult and ad hom are not synonymous.

This is becoming hillarious.

[OCA]

Insult and ad hom are not synonymous.

This is becoming hillarious.

Lol, you do realize you have zero credibility from anyone, left or right on this board, right?

Anytime you say something is hilarious and claim any knowledge at all the whole board laughs its ass off at you.

[OCA]

Oh and you didn't answer the nigger vs niggers question, nice dodge, or would you be willing to go downtown and try that out?