Indeedy it is, and that is a possibility, infact if you read up on Dawkins you will find that the only way he thinks a god could exist would be by the very process you described.
This raises and interesting point, can we become gods? Are we currently on the evolutionary path to become gods?
Most interestingly of all, you were the one that said that my stance is illogical, and yet you are now agreeing with me on, the only difference being that you think this has happened before, spawning a God, when i do not. How is your stance any more logical than mine?
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
By the way I've never heard of Dawkins.
Utter tosh, Mine requires the coming into existence of matter, one event, and from that everything else follows.
Yours requires atleast one (possibly many) beings coming into existence, outside of the universe as it hasn't been made yet, and by some process it is able to learn, and then brings into existence all matter.
I really am amazed, if you could describe more how this 'baby god', if you will, learned? I mean, the very idea is just confusing to me.
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.
Last edited by Noir; 02-18-2010 at 07:31 PM.
If you also agree that an animals suffering should be avoided rather than encouraged, consider what steps you can take.